Biden Judge Noël Wise just spent 90 pages telling Secretary of State Marco Rubio he can’t yank a visa over “protected speech.”
Plaintiffs: the Stanford Daily and two of its international students.
She didn’t like that visas were getting pulled when noncitizens went after this government, Israel, or Charlie Kirk.
A visa is permission to be here. It is not citizenship.
The First Amendment is not a guest pass.
Deportation is immigration law, not censorship.
Biden Judge Noël Wise just spent 90 pages telling Secretary of State Marco Rubio he can’t yank a visa over “protected speech.”
Plaintiffs: the Stanford Daily and two of its international students.
She didn’t like that visas were getting pulled when noncitizens went after this… pic.twitter.com/rhf3nvgvVW
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) August 29, 2026
UPDATE: ONE BIDEN JUDGE just stepped in and ruled AGAINST Sec. Marco Rubio having noncitizen students deported if they advocate for Islamism and other anti-American ideology
Judge Noël Wise just said those students have to stay here under the 1st Amendment.
UNBELIEVABLE!
REMOVE FROM THE BENCH and DEPORT!
I know Marco will find a way to overcome this rogue judge like he’s done before.
Noncitizens who come here on a VISA are pure VISITORS and if we find out they lied on the visa to get here, DEPORT 👋🏻
🚨 UPDATE: ONE BIDEN JUDGE just stepped in and ruled AGAINST Sec. Marco Rubio having noncitizen students deported if they advocate for Islamism and other anti-American ideology
Judge Noël Wise just said those students have to stay here under the 1st Amendment.
UNBELIEVABLE!… pic.twitter.com/HXtYSw58Z6
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) August 29, 2026
Official Ruling: Noncitizens now have a constitutional right to enjoy all the privileges of America while actively trying to destroy it.
Please make yourselves at home. pic.twitter.com/XRuqXf8GfF
— Real Common Sense (@commonsense144) August 29, 2026
REMINDER TO ALL JUDGES. pic.twitter.com/3Ayek11Hez
— Tropicana46 (@AVALL_45) August 29, 2026
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1201(i), the Secretary of State or a consular officer may revoke a visa “at any time, in his discretion.” The Supreme Court has treated these revocations as largely unreviewable discretionary decisions.
In practice the State Department uses this for:New derogatory information (criminal records, even arrests without conviction)
National security or public-safety concerns
Fraud or misrepresentation on the application
“Prudential” revocations based on intelligence or law-enforcement tips
The foreign-policy ground in INA § 237(a)(4)(C) — presence or activities the Secretary believes would have “potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences”
Under 8 U.S.C. § 1201(i), the Secretary of State or a consular officer may revoke a visa “at any time, in his discretion.” The Supreme Court has treated these revocations as largely unreviewable discretionary decisions.
In practice the State Department uses this for:New…
— John_Ruth🇺🇸 (@Holden_Ford1976) August 30, 2026
