United States v. Trump
(Docs Case)Judge Cannon has granted the filing of two Amicus Briefs in this case and will consider them.
One from America First Legal and the other from Citizens United Foundation.
The AFL brief argues that criminal referral from NARA which lead to the… pic.twitter.com/PkwXkxQUy4
— Just Human (@realjusthuman) March 6, 2024
Complete tweet:
United States v. Trump
(Docs Case)
Judge Cannon has granted the filing of two Amicus Briefs in this case and will consider them.
One from America First Legal and the other from Citizens United Foundation.
The AFL brief argues that criminal referral from NARA which lead to the indictment of Trump violated the Administrative Procedures Act should therefore be dismissed as should the indictment.
The CUF brief is the Ed Meese filing that was filed with SCOTUS arguing that Jack Smith was unlawfully appointed and does not have the authority to prosecute the case.
Special Counsel Smith and President Trump have until March 15, 2024 to respond to the briefs if they wish to do so.
Update:
‼️BRIEF ACCEPTED‼️
In the Special Counsel’s prosecution of former President Trump, Judge Cannon accepted AFL’s brief supporting dismissal of the indictment because it offered “considerable help” to her in evaluating the merits of the case.
AFL raised the novel argument that… https://t.co/hSAVtuZh2b
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) March 7, 2024