The campaign to name and shame the holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case is just 50 shades of disgusting and, frankly, un-American.
As we reported, it started with some of the 11 other jurors, some of whom ran to the mainstream media at the first chance they got to complain about the fact that the holdout juror, who we were informed is a man, didn’t see eye to eye with them “on acquitting Clancy (finding her not guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility [i.e., insanity]).”
One of them was admittedly miffed over the fact that, in her words, the man “had the hardest time getting off the fact that Lindsay viciously killed her children.” Well, yeah. Wouldn’t most people in a similar situation?
Then there was Clancy’s unhinged defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, who, as my colleague Bob Hoge correctly pointed out, “crossed just about every ethical line possible” with a direct and pointed attack on the juror outside the courtroom after a mistrial was declared, proclaiming that his fellow jurors “were robbed by one man for whatever his agenda was, who stole seven weeks from the life of these other jurors.” He then added, “I hope that guy can sleep well at night.”
I mean, a defense attorney vociferously advocating on behalf of their client is something they are supposed to do. But as George Washington Law School Professor Jonathan Turley observed, Reddington’s repeated attacks on the juror went way too far and were “utterly reprehensible,” and possibly warranted “a communication from the court.”
…The attack on the holdout juror that was a breathtaking abandonment of restraint and decency. Reddington knows it is very likely that the name of this juror (he has already been identified as one of only the three men on the jury) will eventually be uncovered by Internet…
— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 5, 2026
In an update to all of this, we learned from another juror on Friday that the holdout juror was black – and the only person of color on the jury – which shattered rabid Clancy defenders who wanted to blame the mistrial on an angry white male.
But, not content with the information that was supplied by other jurors about the holdout’s physical characteristics, NBC News Boston has stooped to new levels, effectively doxxing the juror, who they alleged has previously been accused of domestic violence:
EXCLUSIVE: The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial had a history of domestic violence allegations, the NBC10 Boston Investigators have learned through court documents and interviews with family members. Read the full investigation here. https://t.co/qSjIiU8Og8
— NBC10 Boston (@NBC10Boston) September 11, 2026
Did you run background checks on all jury members, or just the Black guy?
— 𝗦𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗠𝗲 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 (@txsalth2o) September 11, 2026
Almost like you’re trying to get this guy lynched or something.
Where have we seen this behavior before…
— Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) September 11, 2026
At this point you have to assume the defense is working with the media to destroy the reputation of the black guy who voted to convict. He’s collateral damage. The real goal is to send a message to prosecutors to drop the case, and to intimidate future potential jurors. https://t.co/kOd3kU28kp
— FischerKing (@FischerKing64) September 11, 2026
A man objected to allowing a woman to kill her three young kids and get away with it, so NBC is trying to smear that juror, whose identity should be protected. Another low for legacy media.
If the juror is being harassed, Florida will provide asylum — I’m sure he’d be welcomed… https://t.co/1kRMNAbaYD
— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) September 11, 2026
(Read more: Red State, 9/11/2026) (Archive)
Juror who wanted to give Lindsay Clancy a pass says about the hero juror who held the line.
“He had the hardest time getting off the fact Lindsay viciously killed her children”
No sh*t. How heartless of him. pic.twitter.com/ovS66JmfeM
— Jim Hanson (@JimHansonDC) September 8, 2026
