Featured Timeline Entries
November 11, 2025 - Obama, Hillary and Soros are the architects of the coup against Trump and the American people

OBAMA, HILLARY, & SOROS are behind the weaponization of government and the architects of the coup against President Trump and the American people, and the DOJ has been let loose to hold them accountable.

There are many new people coming forward inside different agencies, new criminal investigations, subpoenas, and indictments being drawn up, and new grand juries established.

There is more going on in the background that they will never announce because it would directly play against themselves to do so.

This is the complete removal of all the corrupt bad actors and the ones who have infiltrated our own movement and government.

You are being shown the evidence of how the deep state and the media operates, controls through propaganda, and targets and attacks American citizens, even including a sitting president to uphold their lie and retain power and control over you.

Don’t buy everything at the surface level and don’t think they’ll tell you everything every step of the way. This is literally bigger than all of us.

cc: Maria Bartiromo, Ed Martin

(Timeline editor’s note: We are having trouble with embedding tweets and having their accompanying video open up in the timeline entry. Don’t know if it’s a WordPress issue or an X.com issue.)

November 11, 2025 - ‘Clinton Corruption Files’: Bondi, Patel releases new evidence about Clinton Foundation pay-to-play allegations and DOJ cover-up

Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have produced to Congress a new cache of documents showing how Bill and Hillary Clinton’s foundation collected donations from foreign and domestic interests seeking influence – raising fresh concerns that such evidence was kept from federal prosecutors who tried to investigate pay-to-play allegations against the former first family a decade ago.

Officials told Just the News that the documents were transmitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in recent days and detail numerous instances of foreigners and even a U.S. defense contractor seeking to curry favor with the Clintons through donations to their family charity, including when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State. Bill Clinton was a U.S. president from 1993 to 2001.

The officials said some of the evidence was flagged by whistleblowers who claimed such evidence was kept from a corruption investigation that was being conducted in 2015 by the Little Rock, Ark., U.S. attorney’s office before it was shut down by the Obama administration’s Justice Department.

The documents will make clear that there was an effort “to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money,” said one official directly familiar with the documents.

Officials said they have been gathering the evidence for weeks and have dubbed the documents the “Clinton corruption files.” (Read more: Just The News, 11/11/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 - New Epstein email: Jeffrey Epstein sent his lawyer a “high importance” email about Pizzagate

Jeffrey Epstein sent his lawyer an e-mail noted as “high importance” in late 2016 stating Hillary and Bill Clinton’s relationship with Epstein had “the greatest bearing on Pizzagate” referencing an article in the Guardian.

Read that again please!

Epstein considered Pizzagate “high importance” and e-mailed his lawyer about it.

Epstein & the Clinton’s ARE Pizzagate and it’s always been real! Even freaking Epstein knew that which is why he nor anyone has even sent me so much as a legal letter over my nonstop reporting on Pizzagate over the past 10 years.

TICK TOCK!

November 12, 2025 - Exposing the 50-year mortgage sham

In episode 5 of The Gateway Pundit’s DC Dive with TGP White House correspondent Jordan Conradson, we discuss President Trump’s suggestion that he will introduce a 50-year mortgage plan to make housing more affordable for first-time homebuyers.

The President likened his plan to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 30-year mortgage policies in a Truth Social post over the weekend, creating a firestorm among his supporters:

As homeownership in America becomes increasingly unaffordable and out of reach for younger generations, is this really the right answer? Or is it just a mirage of short term affordability that will only exacerbate the problem and enslave young Americans to the banks?

Conradson lays out a compelling argument against the 50-year mortgage and why this is not the solution that will save the American dream for young Americans.

DISTRICT COPPER (CAXPF in the U.S., DCOP in Canada): Visit https://districtcoppercorp.com for more on their U.S. partnership and future prospects.

Joining us to discuss is Steve Abramowicz, host of the Heartland Journal podcast, founder of heartlandjournal.com, and a veteran in the finance industry.

Abramowicz gives his expertise on how to handle buying a home and how home prices are really going to go down without leaving people indebted for life.

Later, we dive into Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against Harris County, Texas for using taxpayer funds to provide legal advice and representation to illegal aliens facing deportation.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Paxton filed the lawsuit on Monday, arguing that Harris County’s allocation of funds to nonprofit groups to help illegals evade deportation is not only a violation of Texas’s Constitution but also federal law.

We also highlight Texas’s Colony Ridge, a 33,000-acre development near Houston believed to be the largest illegal alien settlement in the US, and how this ties into the homeownership crisis in America.

(Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025) (Archive)

November 12, 2025 - Newsom's former chief of staff is arrested for conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice, false statements, and tax crimes

Dana Williamson, former chief of staff to Gov. Gavin Newsom, center, left the courthouse Wednesday after being indicted on federal charges alleging her involvement in a scheme to steal campaign money from former federal Health Secretary Xavier Becerra. (Credit:Sophie Austin/Associated Press)

Political consultant Dana Williamson, 53, of Carmichael, was charged by a federal grand jury with conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruct justice, subscribing to false tax returns, and making false statements, U.S. Attorney Eric Grant announced. The 23-count indictment was unsealed following Williamson’s arrest this morning.

“This is a crucial step in an ongoing political corruption investigation that began more than three years ago,” said U.S. Attorney Grant. “As it always has, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will continue to work tirelessly with our law enforcement partners to protect the people of California from political corruption.”

“Today’s charges are the result of three years of relentless investigative work, in partnership with IRS Criminal Investigation and the U.S. Attorney’s Office,” said FBI Sacramento Special Agent in Charge Sid Patel. “The FBI will remain vigilant in its efforts to uncover fraud and corruption, ensuring our government systems are held to the highest standards.”

“Disguising personal luxuries as business expenses—especially to claim improper tax deductions or to willfully file fraudulent tax returns is a serious criminal offense with severe consequences,” said IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Oakland Field Office Special Agent in Charge Linda Nguyen. “IRS-CI will pursue charges against those who deliberately exploit their business for personal enrichment.”

According to court documents, between February 2022 and September 2024, Williamson conspired with others to divert approximately $225,000 in funds from a dormant political campaign to an associate’s personal use. Collectively, they funneled the money through various business entities and disguised it as pay for what was, in reality, a no-show job.

The indictment also alleges that Williamson conspired with a business associate to create false, backdated contracts after receiving a civil subpoena in January 2024 from the U.S. Attorney’s Office regarding Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans made to Williamson’s business.

Williamson also subscribed to false tax returns claiming more than $1 million in business deductions for what were actually personal and nondeductible expenditures, such as private jet travel, luxury hotel stays, home furnishings, and designer handbags, as well as deductions for no-show jobs for friends and family.

When questioned by FBI agents in connection with ongoing investigations into the diversion of campaign funds, the backdated contracts, and allegations of public corruption, Williamson made false statements to the agents regarding each of those topics. (Read more: Department of Justice, 11/12/2025)  (Archive) (williamson_indictment.pdf)

November 12, 2025 - Newly released Epstein email to Michael Wolff alleges Hillary had sexual affair with ‘suicided’ Vince Foster

Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster (Credit: public domain)

In the latest twist from the trove of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails released by House Democrats, a 2016 message from the convicted pedophile to disgraced author Michael Wolff appears to allege that Hillary Clinton had a sexual affair with former White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster.

The exchange began with Wolff asking Epstein for a “thumb nail” summary on “Nussbaum/foster,” prompting Epstein’s response implying an illicit affair between Hillary and Foster.

The email, dated May 25, 2016, cryptically states: “nussbaum white house counsel. . hillary doing naughties with vince.” This appears to reference Bernard Nussbaum, White House Counsel under President Bill Clinton, and Vince Foster, who died under suspicious circumstances in 1993.

Foster, a longtime Clinton ally from Arkansas, was found dead on July 20, 1993, in Fort Marcy Park, Virginia, with a gunshot wound to the head.

Official investigations, including those by the U.S. Park Police, independent counsels Robert Fiske and Ken Starr, and congressional probes, all concluded it was a suicide.

However, the circumstances, such as the lack of fingerprints on the gun, inconsistencies in witness statements, and the missing bullet, have fueled decades of conspiracy theories suggesting foul play by the Clintons.

The gunshot wound itself raises red flags.

Foster was shot once in the mouth with a .38-caliber revolver, the bullet exiting through the back of his head. For such a high-powered wound, experts say there should have been massive blood loss, skull fragments, and brain matter scattered around the body. Yet, reports describe minimal blood at the scene, just a small trickle from the mouth and nose, with no pooling under the head despite the body lying uphill.

Journalist Christopher Ruddy, in his book “The Strange Death of Vincent Foster,” calls this impossible, suggesting the body was moved from another location where the actual shooting occurred. (Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 - New Epstein email reveals author Michael Wolff urged Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail Trump

Michael Wolff and Jeffrey Epstein (Credit: public domain)

Discredited journalist Michael Wolff actively encouraged convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail then-presidential candidate Donald Trump during the 2016 election cycle, according to newly released emails.

The explosive emails, part of a trove released by the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, show Wolff plotting to use Epstein’s alleged ties to Trump as leverage to either derail his campaign or create a “debt” for personal gain.

Wolff, infamous for his error-riddled “Fire and Fury” book that painted a sensationalized and widely debunked portrait of Trump’s White House, emailed Epstein in December 2015, warning him about potential CNN questions on Trump’s relationship with the sex trafficker.

“I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you — either on air or in scrum afterwards,” Wolff wrote to Epstein.

The next day, he advised, “I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt.”

As Trump’s poll numbers surged, Wolff ramped up the pressure.

In January 2016, he told Epstein, “The more Trump looks real, or perish the thought, inevitable, the more reporters are going to focus on this, so, as you will not be surprised, you need a strategy.”

By February, after Epstein noted an increase in reporter interest, Wolff replied, “Yeah, you’re the Trump bullet.”

Wolff added that The New York Times had contacted him about Epstein and Trump, and the Hillary Clinton campaign was “digging deeply,” urging Epstein to “preempt” the story.

Just before the election, Wolff emailed with the subject “Now could be the time,” saying, “There’s an opportunity to come forward this week and talk about Trump in such a way that could garner you great sympathy and help finish him. Interested?”

(Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 - The Epstein emails that clear Trump, not implicate him

The latest batch of Epstein related emails released by congressional Democrats is being marketed as a revelation, yet the material reveals something quite different. What emerges is a portrait of Jeffrey Epstein as a man who feared Donald Trump because Trump understood what was happening long before Epstein’s public fall. This is not conjecture. Epstein himself admitted it in exchanges with the journalist Michael Wolff, whose role turns out to be much deeper than previously understood. Wolff was not simply profiling Epstein, he was working with him, thinking strategically about how to manage political narratives, calibrate public messaging, and use Trump as a kind of political instrument. This reframes the meaning of the disclosures. They do not implicate Trump. They exonerate him, and they shed light on the curious fact that figures like Bill Clinton and Bill Gates, who spent far more time with Epstein and enjoyed far more intimate access to his private world, never alerted authorities and in some cases actively insulated him. A puzzled reader may pause here. How can emails released by Trump’s political opponents help Trump? By considering the structure of the evidence. First, Epstein believed Trump knew about his criminal operations. Second, Epstein believed Trump went to authorities with his suspicions after expelling Epstein from Mar a Lago in 2004. Third, Epstein and Wolff repeatedly discuss Trump in a way that presupposes Trump’s distance from Epstein’s crimes. None of these points fit the narrative Democrats hoped to advance.

Consider what is already known. Epstein’s ban from Mar a Lago in 2004 has been public for years. Many have wondered what prompted it. Some attributed it to a dispute over real estate. Others suspected something more. The new emails point toward the second answer. Epstein writes to Wolff as a man who understands that Trump had sized him up, recognized something was seriously wrong, and taken meaningful steps to distance himself. The idea that Trump identified Epstein’s pattern of behavior before much of the elite social world did is not surprising. People with wide experience often recognize patterns others dismiss. One does not need to witness a crime to recognize the signs that a man is living a double life. The indicators accumulate, and eventually the picture becomes unavoidable. Trump saw the picture and acted. Clinton and Gates did not. To see the contrast, imagine two observers watching a piece of clay being shaped into a sculpture. The person who has worked with clay for years recognizes early signs of form and intention. The novice does not. Trump had spent decades around men who projected sophistication while hiding rot. Epstein fit the pattern and Trump observed it quickly.

The deeper puzzle concerns Wolff’s role. Reporters ask questions. Strategists craft narratives. The emails show Wolff doing the second, not the first. He advises Epstein on how to respond to CNN debate questions about Trump. He explains how to convert Trump’s denials into political capital, how to create what Wolff calls PR and political currency. He helps Epstein think about whether and when to go public as an anti Trump commentator to soften his own image. These are not journalistic functions. They are features of a relationship in which the journalist becomes a participant, offering guidance that could influence elections. This is why Byron York and others described Wolff as Epstein’s adviser and strategist. The term captures the distinctive character of the conversations. Wolff was acting as a kind of confidant, someone Epstein trusted enough to reveal fears, ambitions, and possible tactics.

A careful reader may wonder whether Wolff was simply pandering to a source. That would not explain the volume of communication or the candor embedded within it. Wolff conducted more than one hundred hours of interviews with Epstein. They traveled in overlapping social and financial circles. Epstein even joined an investment group assembled by Wolff to bid on New York Magazine in 2004. Such proximity is not inherently improper, but it creates risks. When the journalist becomes a friend, and when the friend begins advising on political maneuvers involving a future president, the boundaries blur. The emails show blurred boundaries everywhere. Epstein asks how Trump might answer a question in a debate. Wolff tells him to let Trump hang himself, then explains how to deploy the resulting contradiction. The discussion reads less like reporting and more like a planning session, one focused on how to transform Trump’s possible missteps into leverage.

Two further features of the email dump are striking. (Read more: AmuseOnX/Substack, 11/14/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 - Christina Bobb exposes names of Democrats behind alleged $200K payments for prosecution of GOP electors

Christina Bobb (Credit: public domain)

Arizona was still recovering from a bloody election war in 2020 over the hotly contested presidential race between President Trump and Joe Biden, and the race between Republican Kari Lake and Democrat (then-acting Secretary of State) Katie Hobbs for governor, when Arizonans were faced with yet another highly implausible result in the 2022 election between Democrat Chris Mayes and very popular Republican candidate Abraham Hamadeh. After almost two months and a recount, the race for Arizona attorney general was called for Democrat Chris Mayes by a mere 280 votes.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (Credit: public domain)

As one of her first official acts as Arizona’s new attorney general, Chris Mayes, in April 2024, committed what many believed was a coordinated act of lawfare with attorneys general and prosecutors in several swing states against the eleven 2020 Republican electors and seven Trump lawyers, charging them with 9 felonies each.

In addition to Arizona, 3 other states filed criminal charges against the Republican electors who filed an alternate slate of electoral votes for President Trump in the event the election results in their states were overturned:

Georgia (Fulton County) — Fulton County DA Fani Willis’s investigation led to a sweeping indictment (Aug. 2023 grand jury) that included the Georgia GOP electors and allied lawyers, who were charged with several felony counts, including racketeering, conspiracy, making false statements, filing false documents, and impersonating a public officer.

Michigan — Michigan radical activist Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel charged 16 Republican electors in July 2023, with 8 felonies each, including forgery and conspiracy. The laughable case was recently dismissed by a judge appointed by Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer.

Michigan’s activist (and not-so-bright) Attorney General Dana Nessel had a hand in destroying her own lawfare case against the 16 GOP alternate electors when she appeared on a far-left Zoom call admitting that the Electors truly believe Trump won, which belies her case that they falsely claimed Trump won the 2020 election. Michigan’s partisan hack attorney general then proceeded to brag about the hand-selected venue where electors would possibly face a far-left jury pool who would likely convict them.

Nevada — Nevada authorities brought charges against six Nevada fake electors (indicted in late 2023/charges refiled in 2024), including counts such as offering a false instrument for filing and uttering a forged instrument; the Nevada AG re-filed actions in December 2024 after earlier procedural setbacks.

Several other states had “alternate” or “contingent” slates (Pennsylvania, New Mexico, and Wisconsin), but none of those states has resulted in criminal charges. In New Mexico, prosecutors concluded that the wording on the certificates or state law meant prosecution wasn’t feasible without legislative change, and in others, prosecutors were investigating but chose not to pursue lawfare against their political enemies.

Yesterday, Christina Bobb filed a bombshell whistleblower complaint that will likely blow up the lawfare cases in Arizona and possibly every other state where electors were GOP electors and lawyers were falsely accused and/or charged by heartless Democrat thugs with crimes they never committed.

In her whistleblower complaint, the brilliant and fearless Christina Bobb, who is a former investigative journalist, author, Trump lawyer from 2022-2024, and a defendant in the Arizona lawfare case, claims that she has discovered she and her co-defendants (in State of Arizona v. Kelli Ward) had serious constitutional issues: the court found prosecutors infringed rights and that the case had “motivations other than criminal justice”.

Bobb claims in her statement that there is organized bribery in Arizona (and possibly other states), stating that the Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA) paid $200,000 to Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes in exchange for giving prosecutorial influence to States United Democracy Center.

The States United Democracy Center was founded in 2020 by one of America’s dirtiest Democrats, former Obama “Ethics Czar, Norm Eisen.

According to Christina Bobb’s claim, it appears that AG Mayes followed a prosecutorial blueprint provided by a group led by Norm Eisen and another one of the Democrat Party’s dirtiest players, lawyer and founder of the Democracy Docket, Marc Elias.

Through an inadvertent disclosure in the discovery she was receiving, Bobb uncovered that Mayes’ campaign received $200,000 from a group with a different name that happens to share the same address, president, executive director, and leadership team as the Elias and Eisen group. The money came after the election, implying that Mayes may have been paid to prosecute Trump supporters.

From the whistleblower complaint:

There appears to be organized bribery in the state of Arizona, and likely extending to other states. In the course of my criminal prosecution, the State of Arizona inadvertently disclosed information to the defense, which they have since acknowledged as authentic. Upon closer inspection, the Arizona Attorney General received $200,000 (what appears to be) in exchange for the Democratic Attorney General’s Association to have prosecutorial influence – through one of their initiatives, “States United Democracy Center” – in prosecuting their political opponents. To be clear, the Democratic Attorney General’s Association paid Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes $200,000, and she gave States United prosecution power to prosecute Trump attorneys, allies, and electors. Prosecutors claim on the record and in emails that States United represents their office.

The complaint explains: (Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 13, 2025 - Tucker Carlson announces he is releasing evidence tomorrow proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler by Thomas Crooks

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson announces he is releasing evidence tomorrow proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania by Thomas Crooks

Joe Rogan and Elon Musk pointed out the INSANE inconsistencies

– The assassins house was PROFESSIONALLY scrubbed
– His home was scrubbed so well there wasn’t even silverware left in the home
– No footprint on the internet
– No social media footprint (completely wiped)
– He was in a BlackRock commercial
– Joe Rogan says some individuals inside BlackRock may have “recognized that it’s beneficial to them if he gets assassinated”
– There was never a formal report
– There was never press conferences where they detailed all the information they know currently and where the investigation stands at the moment
– He was a very young g kid there with a rangefinder (used to measure distances, very suspicious)
– CNN streamed it live, which Joe Rogan does not believe they did for any other rally. And certainly not for a rally that’s in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania
– They wouldn’t let people be on that roof because the Secret service lady said it was sloped and it was dangerous
– The snipers that were on the other roof was a, a steeper pitch (It made no f*cking sense)
– Random people saw him and pointed him out on the roof with a gun for a long time before it happened
– The kid had 5 phones
– His body was immediately cremated
– There was some indications that there was a phone that had been traveling from outside the FBI offices in D.C to where this kid lived multiple times

We need answers.

November 13, 2025 - Emails show Smith team tied to blocking Clinton campaign inquiry as DOJ builds grand conspiracy case

(Credit: Mark Reinstein/Shutterstock.com)

Justice Department officials tied to special counsel Jack Smith’s team have been linked to the blocking of an FBI inquiry into the Clinton campaign’s 2016 funding of the Steele Dossier, with this being just the latest revelation about Smith as the Trump Justice Department builds a grand conspiracy case alleging years of anti-Trump lawfare.

Emails released Thursday appear to show the officials shut down a potential FBI investigation tied to possible campaign finance violations carried out by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign when it used cutouts to fund the opposition research firm Fusion GPS and British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier. Two officials tied to Smith’s anti-Trump investigation were linked to the decision by the FBI not to pursue the alleged campaign finance wrongdoing by Clinton’s campaign.

The decision by the Trump DOJ and FBI to open a probe that treats the last decade of political weaponization of law enforcement and intelligence agencies as an ongoing criminal conspiracy will likely be aided by the wave of recently-released information obtained by congressional investigators.

J.P. Cooney (Credit: LinkedIn)

(…) Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias hired the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which in turn hired Steele in 2016. Elias has testified he was aware of Fusion’s plans to have Steele brief reporters on his anti-Trump research during the 2016 contest, met with Steele during the 2016 contest and periodically briefed the campaign about the findings from Fusion and Steele.

Special Counsel John Durham said members of the Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie all played a coordinated role in pushing collusion claims and that Elias was part of the “joint venture” in 2016.

The FBI would pass on a criminal investigation into the campaign finance angle – and new records appear to show why.

Richard Pilger (Credit: public domain)

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said Thursday that “the decision to decline the investigation” into the Clinton campaign and the DNC was made by Richard Pilger, then a leader in the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, and by J.P. Cooney, who was working at the time within the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

Grassley noted that Pilger “was later pivotal in reviewing and approving the opening of Smith’s Arctic Frost investigation” while Cooney “served as Smith’s Deputy Special Counsel for that investigation.” Pilger had previously been tied to Smith’s involvement with the Lerner saga years before. (Read more: Just the News, 11/13/2025)  (Archive)

November 14, 2025 - Tucker Carlson exposes Trump shooter's ties to foreign terror group

Tucker Carlson‘s latest exposé is sending shockwaves through MAGA circles after the former Fox News host suggested that Trump’s failed assassin, Thomas Crooks, may be connected to a foreign terror group.

Carlson’s investigative team released a 34-minute video diving into the online history of Crooks, the 20-year-old would-be assassin who shot Donald Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania in July 2024. Crooks’ bullet came within less than an inch of penetrating Trump’s skull.

More than a year after the assassination attempt, the FBI has yet to release a clear motive for why Crooks tried to shoot Trump or whether he acted alone or in coordination with others.

Carlson’s uncovered YouTube comments allegedly posted by Crooks from 2019-2020, revealing the shooter’s long digital history of making calls for assassinations and political violence. Crooks’ YouTube comments indicate he radically shifted his ideology from pro-Trump towards the far left.

During the final phase in 2020 of Crook’s YouTube commenting, the shooter began interacting with a suspicious user ‘Willy Tepes’ who appeared to encourage Crooks to commit political violence.

He wrote to Crooks on August 4, 2020, ‘If a gun and a badge is all that is needed, then authority obviously comes from the barrel of a gun. We have more guns than they do ;)’

‘There is no way we can avoid a war at this point, so you just better get used to the idea,’ he added.

Carlson claims that Tepes’s name is listed on a foreign Antifa website connecting him to the Nordic Resistance Movement – a neo-Nazi group based in Scandinavia which has been designated a terrorist organization by the State Department.

‘The FBI hasn’t made any mention of him in public, although they certainly know he exists. Just days after the shooting, somebody screenshotted Tepes’ YouTube account page despite the fact that he has very few followers,’ Carlson said.

‘To the extent that he can be traced online now, you can find his username being used on a foreign Antifa website, those sites link him to the Nordic Resistance Movement … that’s all we know.’

Tepes wrote in another reply to Crooks about government efforts to seize guns from citizens.

‘The more guns that are out there, the less likely a gun confiscation will be possible. Nope, guns do not guarantee a victory anymore than jet fighters, tanks and drones do. It is the fighting spirit and brains that wins.’

‘We have nothing to lose and everything to win…..and the alternative, a global police state, is unacceptable. Nothing in life is simple but that is no argument against doing it :)’

Following Tepes’ online interactions with Crooks, the Trump shooter’s YouTube commenting ends.

Moreover, Crooks’ political views seemingly shifted dramatically towards left-wing ideology around early 2020.

In January 2020, Crooks reportedly attacked Trump for his ‘stupidity’ in one of his YouTube comments and mocked Trump supporters for sounding like a ‘cult.’

Crooks then reportedly called for anti-Trump supporters to conduct ‘terrorism-style attacks’ against the US government.

The future assassin outlined ways to ‘sneak a bomb’ into a government building and ‘set it off before anyone sees you,’ according to Carlson.

‘[In my opinion] the only way to fight the [government] is with terrorism style attacks, sneak a bomb into an essential building [and] set it off before anyone sees you, track down and important people/politicians/military leaders etc and try to assassinate them. Any sort of head to head fight is suicide and ambush/surprise attacks likely aren’t going to end well,’ Crooks allegedly wrote on YouTube.

MAGA influencers and lawmakers reacted with shock to Carlson’ latest reporting and demanded more transparency from Kash Patel’s FBI regarding Crooks.

Tennessee Republican Rep. Tim Burchett claimed that Crooks was groomed by the CIA via MKUltra-style mind control programs during an interview reacting to Carlson’s latest report.

‘They programmed this kid. You got a kid who’s got access to guns or has some simple knowledge of a firearm, he was programmed,’ Burchett told conservative influencer Benny Johnson. ‘The facts have been buried or burned or whoever knew is either sitting on a beach somewhere and, uh, enjoying a fruity drink or they’re dead.’

‘When the CIA says, ‘We don’t have this thing,’ and then their asses are brought into a court of law and they say, ‘Well, we have it, but we don’t use it anymore.’ Apparently, somebody’s using it.’

‘I’ve said that all along,’ Burchett added. ‘I’ve said that. Look at the history. Look at where we’re at in this country, the Deep State. It’s disgusting. Trump’s right. They’re not after, they’re not after him. They’re after us. He’s just standing in the way.’ (Read more: The Daily Mail, 11/14/2025)  (Archive)

November 15, 2025 - Prison staffers steal Ghislaine Maxwell’s attorney-client emails and funnels them to Jamie Raskin who then leaks to media

November 16, 2025 - January 6 Committee cost twice previous estimates, hiring TV producers to dramatize attack

The House committee investigating the January 6 “insurrection.” (Credit: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc./Getty Images)

The U.S. House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol cost almost twice as much as previously reported, including spending taxpayer funds for TV news producers and documentary filmmakers to create videos dramatizing its case against President Donald Trump, an investigation by The Center Square found.

The Washington Post reported that the panel had a projected budget of $9.3 million in September 2022. According to a review of U.S. House disbursements, the select committee spent $17.4 million.U.S. Rep. Troy Nehls, a Texas Republican who is on a new committee appointed by House Speaker Mike Johnson to investigate security failures on Jan. 6, said the original committee didn’t spend taxpayer money properly after The Center Square told him about the final costs of the panel’s investigation.

(…) Dan Savickas, president of policy and government affairs at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, a non-partisan nonprofit, said more than doubling of the budget was not appropriate.

“The median budget for a House committee is $6 million a year, so for the Jan. 6 committee to spend $17.4 million is excessive,” he told The Center Square in an interview. “And anytime a committee is grandstanding, specifically Jan. 6, to fit a narrative instead of holding people accountable and getting the story is bad. That’s why they hired documentary filmmakers.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat and chair of the committee, declined an interview request.“

The work of the committee speaks for itself, and the chairman continues to stand by it,” Yasmine Brown, a press secretary and communications director, wrote in an email to The Center Square.

An undetermined amount was spent on three dozen contractors and consultants. Many worked for a few months or less than a year, rather than all 18 months like full-time staff.

They are listed in the committee’s report but do not show up in a list of expenditures the U.S. House posted online disclosing its spending.Among them were the former president of ABC News, a longtime producer for ABC’s Nightline, an Emmy-award winning daily TV news producer, and a former documentarian for the Oprah Winfrey Network.

“I was part of the first ever team of former television journalists brought in by the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol to produce the historic live hearings laying out the committee’s evidence to the country,” Melinda Arons, a former Nightline senior producer, wrote on her LinkedIn page. (Read more: Just the News, 11/16/2025)  (Archive)

November 16, 2025 - Jack Smith may have handed Trump the golden key to pardon Tina Peters

Jack Smith may have provided President Trump with the legal avenue to pardon Tina Peters.

An analysis of the recent release of data from the Arctic Frost documentation, which includes Jack Smith’s list of conservatives he spied on, reveals some shocking information.  The House Judiciary Committee began releasing a list of individuals whom Jack Smith and the Biden Administration illegally spied on.  One significant finding has emerged.

A smoking gun has surfaced in favor of President Trump’s legal avenue to pardon Colorado’s Tina Peters.

The Arctic Frost Document, an inventory of Americans spied on by Jack Smith, features a unique entry on page 101.  It is believed that this entry refers to Tina Peters.  In the list of those illegally spied on, there is a line that lists Mike Lindell, and it includes a reference to “Mesa County”.

Mike Lindell was involved with Tina Peters for some time.  He invited Tina to his first symposium in South Dakota.  That was the first time we heard of Tina, a county clerk from Mesa County, Colorado, in charge of elections.  She shared at Mike’s symposium in South Dakota that she had identified altered results in her election systems after a recent election.  This was shocking news and the highlight of that first symposium.  There are countless articles linking Mike Lindell to Tina Peters and the election fraud she discovered IN Mesa County.

Tina Peters was later indicted in a Colorado state court and indicted on bogus charges and put away for 9 years.  President Trump is unable to pardon her because he lacks the authority to pardon a state crime.  No President to date has pardoned someone for a state crime.  However, if her case in Colorado was managed or significantly impacted by individuals who were part of the federal government, then some believe that President Trump could pardon Tina.

Before today, there was ample evidence that the federal government under Biden was involved in the Tina Peters case. There is an argument that if the federal government led the effort, directed it, or was a significant part of the effort to indict and imprison Tina Peters, it would give President Trump the ability to pardon her.

The Biden Regime’s involvement in Tina Peters Case

The FBI issued a statement almost immediately after Peters came forward, stating that they would investigate her for potential violations of federal laws. The Biden regime never formally prosecuted Tina, but it appears that Biden’s Department of Justice was working closely with local Colorado officials who sought to put Peters in jail. (https://coloradosun.com/2021/08/17/tina-peters-replaced/)

The Mesa County District Attorney, Dan Rubinstein, included Matthew Kirsh, the United States Attorney for Colorado in a May 17, 2022, email to multiple District Attorneys across Colorado. The email is titled “Rule 3.8 Meeting” which appears to reference the rules of professional conduct for prosecutors. (Justice.gov)

Email from Dan Rubinstein to DOJ attorney and Colorado District Attorneys, apparently brainstorming how to appear legitimate and ethical while prosecuting Tina Peters.

Daniel Rubenstein (Credit: Mesa County DA Office)

Matthew Kirsch (Credit: Justice.gov)

The email suggests that Rubinstein was having some trouble reconciling the prosecution of Tina Peters with prosecutors’ rules of professional conduct and had to call in the cavalry to help him brainstorm ways to avoid being “accused of wrongdoing.”

First, Rubinstein appears to recognize that there is no precedent for the prosecution he wants to undertake, as he expresses a desire that this group of legal minds start writing opinions and issuing guidance documents in the vein of the Colorado Bar Association (CBA) and the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council (CDAC). Without a coherent legal pathway for prosecution, it appears that Rubinstein encouraged this course of action to provide prosecutors with cover. Second, Rubinstein notes that it is problematic that they have no formal appointments from a government body to lay the groundwork to prosecute Peters. Third, Rubinstein informs the group of their need to anticipate defending themselves as to why they didn’t seek an opinion on Peter’s case from the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Commission. Rubinstein and his cronies appear to have succeeded in giving their efforts the veneer of legitimacy because three months after this email was sent, Peters was indicted by a grand jury. (ColoradoPolitics.com)

Another glaring piece of evidence that the federal government led the Tina Peters case is that if this was ‘only a Colorado issue’, why were US Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, participating in initial Mesa County discussions via Webex regarding the findings of Clerk Peters and her actions related to those findings?

(Read more: Joe Hoft, 11/16/2025)  (Archive)

November 17, 2025 - FBI, Secret Service butchered the Thomas Crooks case

Then-FBI Director Chris Wray told Congress after the July 13, 2024 attack that the bureau had found nothing in Crooks’ online history that pointed to a motive or political ideology.  (Credit: ZUMAPRESS)

We are all owed a better explanation from the FBI and Secret Service about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump 16 months ago at a campaign rally in Butler, Pa.

The president himself remains unsatisfied with the answers he’s been given about the circumstances leading to 20-year-old Thomas Crooks climbing on a rooftop with an AR-15-style rifle and firing eight times at Trump, narrowly missing his head but hitting his ear.

(…) There is something very wrong with the official story and that invites conspiracy theories.

The president demanded answers months ago. A man was murdered. What is going on?

Then-FBI Director Chris Wray told Congress after the July 13, 2024, attack that the bureau had found nothing in Crooks’ online history that pointed to a motive or political ideology.

Paul Abbate (Credit: public domain)

A week later, Wray’s deputy Paul Abbate told Congress that comments posted on one of Crooks’ social media accounts “appear to reflect antisemitic and anti-immigration themes to espouse political violence and are described as extreme in nature.”

Thanks to an enterprising source who uncovered Crooks’ hidden digital footprint, we can see that Abbate misled Congress by omission, because he left out an entire section of Crooks’ online interactions from January to August 2020 when he did an ideological backflip and went from rabidly pro-Trump to rabidly anti-Trump and then went dark, never seeming to post again.

Among the 17 accounts uncovered by our source were ones on YouTube, Snapchat, Venmo, Zelle, GroupMe, Discord, Google Play, Quizlet, Chess.com and Quora.

The online interactions from when Crooks was ages 15 to 17 give us a better understanding of his evolution into an assassin, and invite more questions about what — or who — reversed his ideology.

“The danger Crooks posed was visible for years in public online spaces,” says the source. “His radicalization, violent rhetoric and obsession with political violence were all documented under his real name. The threat wasn’t hidden.”

The official narrative claimed he acted alone and without a clear motive, ideology or digital footprint.

Yet the source found reams of information that shows Crooks “was not simply some unknowable lone actor … He left a digital trail of violent threats, extremist ideology and admiration for mass violence. He spoke openly of political assassination, posted under his real name and was even flagged by other users who mentioned law enforcement in their replies. Despite this, his account remained active for more than five years — and was only removed the day after the shooting.

“None of this online activity was referenced in the final congressional report released in December 2024, making this even more troubling,” the source said.

Starting with Crooks’ phone number, the source used tools available to private investigators and web archives to uncover the assassin’s very visible online persona.

Crooks’ most prolific activity was on YouTube, with 737 public comments. The account “Tomcrooks2178” (visible to other users as Tom Crooks) was created on Jan. 14, 2019, and suspended on July 14, 2024, the day after the Butler attack, for violating YouTube’s policy on violent criminal organizations. (Read more: New York Post, 11/17/2025)  (Archive)

November 17, 2025 - Bill and Hillary Clinton refuse to appear before House Oversight for depositions

November 18, 2025 - The Unlawful Order video is brainwashing, using common propaganda techniques

(Credit: China Global Television Network (CGTN))

UNLAWFUL ORDER VIDEO WAS BRAINWASHING. USED COMMON PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES🚨

1: “We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.” This is a common brainwashing technique called “The Illusory Effect”. Trying to make things feel true because people say they are true.

2: “Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.” This is a propaganda technique known as “Push-Pull Manipulation”. The goal is to create emotional confusion by saying “you are respected BUT we are losing that respect for you”.

3: “This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens.” This is a propaganda technique known as “Reframing a Benevolent Authority as a Malevolent Threat”. Trying to get soldiers to question the goodness of their chain of command. This is an authoritarian technique.

4: “Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.” This is a powerful and old technique called “Manufactured Threat”. No details. No specifics. Just “fear and distrust your commanders”. This is an authoritarian technique. One used by Hitler specifically.

5: “You can refuse illegal orders…You MUST refuse illegal orders”. Without specifics, this is called an “Ambiguous Directive”. This induces uncertainty, anxiety, and an unhealthy self-policing because people don’t know what the “wrong” behavior is. It is an authoritarian technique.

6: “No one has to carry out orders that violate our laws or our Constitution…we know this is hard”. This is a classic example of a powerful technique known as “Moral Vagueness Manipulation”. They are telling you that you don’t have to do something wrong, and “they” know it’s hard because there is pressure to do the “wrong” thing. It creates a sense of duty without specifying the action required. This is INTENTIONAL, and meant to create confusion.

7: “It’s a difficult time to be a public servant”. Another Illusory Effect statement.

8: “Your vigilance is critical”. This is an authoritarian technique call “Vague Threat Alerting”. Tell people to be vigilant, do NOT explain what they should watch for clearly, then let their imagination supply the threat. Unidentified threats are always more frightening than specific ones.

9: “Know we have your back”. This is called “Fear Safety Manipulation”. Basically, we are asking you to put your neck out and disobey orders BUT, just do it, we have your back.

10: “Because NOW, more than ever, the American people need you.” This is called a “Call to Duty without Content”. It’s used to stir obligation, without definition of cost.

11: “Don’t give up the ship”. This means we are at war. That we are in danger. That we are counting on YOU to resist. In this message, it creates vague fear, ambiguous commitments, undefined moral burdens, etc.

If an authoritarian regime was prepping their military for a coup, this is the exact type of message they would send the military. This is how you persuade good people, to do immoral things.

Let’s be clear, this video was about priming the US Military to disobey LEGAL orders, not ILLEGAL orders. This is civilian and military intelligence programming 101….we use this on OTHER countries militaries. Now they are turning it inward.

@8141travis5♬ original sound – 8141travis5

Win Without War, a fiscally sponsored project of the Center for International Policy, declares on its website that it stands with the Senators and insists: “It is not seditious to remind servicemembers of the oath they swore.”

▪️ The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild (NIPNLG) is a fiscally sponsored project of the Alliance for Global Justice (AfGJ), and the NLG as a whole is widely recommended as the primary legal contact and support provider for participants in pro-Palestine and immigration protests.

▪️Win Without War is a fiscally sponsored project of the Center for International Policy (CIP), as disclosed on CIP’s 2019 IRS Form 990.

▪️The Center for International Policy (CIP) is a progressive think tank advocating for a non-militaristic U.S. foreign policy centered on diplomacy, transparency, human rights, and solutions to war, corruption, inequality, and climate change.

💰 CIP’s major funders include Open Society Foundations (George Soros), Carnegie Corporation of New York, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Charles Koch Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation and McKnight Foundation, among others (per Cause IQ and public 990 filings).

UPDATE 11/28/2025

General Flynn Calls for President Trump to Warn the Nation of Another Deep State Color Revolution

November 18, 2025 - Epstein's niece exposes Ghislaine and Clinton, reveals 'horrific' abuse, satanic cults, child trafficking

Anya Wick, Jeffrey Epstein’s niece, has launched a direct challenge to global power structures, detailing Satanic cults, child trafficking, and her own abuse, implicating Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton. (Credit: public domain)

Anya Wick, who claims to be Jeffrey Epstein’s niece, has released an explosive account, detailing her own ‘horrific’ abuse and exposing the inner workings of a network involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill Clinton, Satanic cults, and child trafficking.

This direct testimony offers a chilling, first-hand look at the high-level depravity that has remained shrouded in secrecy for years.

A New Account of Abuse and Sinister Networks

Anya Beth Epstein, now known as Anya Wick, shared her life story in a July episode of Shaun Attwood’s true crime podcast, linking her family’s rituals to historical cults and current controversies. She claims she was brought up within the ‘Cult of Baal’, a satanic organisation that used Judaism as a disguise while engaging in incest and the trade of children.

Wick asserts that the actor Shia LaBeouf is her twin brother; she maintains they were separated when they were four years old, with their birth certificates being falsified as a method of ritualistic manipulation.

The Testimony of Anya Beth Epstein

Wick recounts her childhood in Colorado, stating she was subjected to chemical memory loss using substances like LSD to conceal the history of mistreatment. In 2015, she changed her gender to try to avoid further manipulation, but she reversed this transition in 2020 after those suppressed memories came back.

Currently, she utilises sites such as TikTok to relate her experience, to help others who have endured similar trauma. She connects her lineage to prominent individuals, including Walt Disney, whom she identifies as her great-grandfather, and claims to have met with heads of state, members of royalty, and celebrities during covert gatherings.

This detail implies broader participation by high-ranking individuals in these exploitation schemes. Her account highlights a pattern where being victimised can lead to becoming an abuser, particularly concerning males. This pattern is intensified by societal disapproval and power structures that suppress revelations and shield those in authority.

‘My family masqueraded themselves as Jewish publicly, but behind closed doors… we are Satanists,’ Wick told Attwood. ‘I believe [Epstein] wanted to talk more about the other parties involved… he was a pawn,’ Wick said.

Should the things Wick asserts be verifiable, a National File report suggests, they necessitate thorough inquiries into society’s highest ranks. Furthermore, her account serves to encourage survivors to speak out, offering a path to halt these patterns of mistreatment finally.

The Shocking Claims: Exposing the Network

Wick asserts that she was born Anya Beth Epstein on 4 June 1988, in Colorado, alongside her twin, the actor Shia LaBeouf. She maintains their separation, and their parents orchestrated the falsification of birth records as part of a ritualistic, incest-worshipping child trafficking group.

She alleges enduring childhood sexual servitude, claiming she was given LSD from a young age to induce “MKUltra-style” chemical memory loss, effectively blocking any recollection of the assaults until 2020.

Wick states her family were members of the ‘Cult of Baal’, a centuries-old Satanic fertility sect that practised child sacrifice and abuse while operating under a Jewish guise.

Epstein: A Pawn in the Family Game

She describes meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2007, characterising Epstein as a ‘pawn’ for her uncle, Stephen. She notes Epstein handled the abuse of teenagers, but was not part of the family’s younger child rituals.

Wick claims her great-grandfather was Walt Disney (originally Artur Bick). She suggests that the famous Disney characters, Mickey and Minnie, were inspired by the dynamics of incest within her own family.

She alleges encountering every US President during her life, members of the British Royal Family, along with figures like Harvey Weinstein and the Clintons, at secretive gatherings such as Bohemian Grove and various Colorado resorts.

Wick recounts rituals at Bohemian Grove that involved the burning of human remains and assaults. She also describes ‘family gatherings’ where relatives and powerful elites abused children like her.

She maintains Bill Clinton was present with children at multiple sites, not just Epstein’s private island, and suggests his iconic blue dress portrait signifies his compulsory submission.

Wick changed her gender to male in 2015 to escape the exploitation, successfully halting the abuse from her family. She later reversed this transition after her memories returned, suffering infertility following a hysterectomy.

She asserts that political and entertainment figures are compromised through submission or sexual acts with minors, guaranteeing their silence. She adds that ‘black men in dresses’ is a sign of industry initiation.

Wick claims her father boasted of his ability to control Viacom. She alleges the family uses media monopolies to sustain their power, keeping the general public distracted by conflicts and political scandals.

Wick’s explosive revelations only intensify the mounting scrutiny surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s network, arriving just as the US House of Representatives prepares to vote on releasing an expansive trove of federal investigation files.  (Read more: International Business Times, 11/18/2025) (Archive)

2017 - 2025: Trump and the Saudi Arabia Timeline

The world doesn’t know it yet, but the relationship between Trump and MBS will be remembered as the alliance that changed the world.

Think sword dance 2017.

A month after Trump’s visit, King Salman rescinded the Crown from Muhammad bin Nayef, in favor of MBS.

This led to the infamous Saudi corruption purge of 2017 and consolidation of power/money within the Saudi royal family. Nayef and his faction were essentially neutralized.

Why is this significant to the US? Because in 2015, Trump himself accused the Nayef faction, via Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, of buying/controlling US politicians.

Trump, along with King Salman and MBS, took out the corrupt faction within the Saudi royal family, and have been working together ever since to create a new world and peaceful Middle East, which included neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

And the world had no idea it was happening.

And if anyone has doubts about this timeline, I already proved it, with the paper trail from Trump’s tweets. See attached.

I understand it sounds crazy, but it happened.

1) Saudi Arabia Timeline: 🧵

Before Trump was President, December 2015, he claimed Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Al Saud, “wants to control our politicians with daddy’s money”.

Trump called out Al-Waleed just a few months after coming down the escalator, and promised to stop this when he became President.

Trump was alleging that certain US politicians were owned by Al-Waleed, who was, and still is, the 2nd largest stakeholder in Twitter, now X, via his investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company.

Al-Waleed is an extended member of the Royal House of Saud, not in direct line of the crown, but grandson to King Abdulaziz Al Saud, the founder of modern day Saudi Arabia.

On paper, he is worth $16+ billion, but he has (had) access to much more.

2) Fast-forward to May 20th 2017:

Trump’s first visit on his international tour in 2017, was Saudi Arabia.

Trump did the famous sword dance and odd photo ops with King Salman.

The sword dance, known as “Ardah”, is a symbol of unity/cooperation, and originated as a war dance, used by warriors to intimidate their enemies and show unity before battle.

3) Fast-forward a month later to June 21st, 2017:

King Salman replaces Mohammed bin Nayef (right) as Crown Prince and in line for the throne, in favor of King Salman’s son, Mohammed bin Salman (left).

This historic move consolidated power with the Al Sudairi faction within the Royal family, and took power away from the Nayef faction, who had grown as a rival to Mohammed bin Salman, within the royal family.

MBS also has a stellar relationship with one President Donald Trump.

So one month after Trump visits Saudi Arabia, King Salman revokes the crown from Mohammed bin Nayef, and appoints now Trump ally, Mohammed bin Salman.

Nayef was placed on House arrest after being revoked of the Crown, and would be later be formally arrested on charges of treason.

4) Fast-forward four months later to November 4th, 2017:

New Crown Prince MBS conducts unprecedented corruption “purge” on corrupt politicians, Royal family members, including, the previously mentioned, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, on charges of money laundering and corruption.

MBS arrested and detained hundreds do corrupt Saudis.

5) Then two days later, on November 6th, 2017, right in the middle of this unprecedented Saudi purge, President Trump tweets that he has “great confidence in King Salman and the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia”(MBS).

So Trump’s buddy, MBS, arrested Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, and forced Al-Waleed to give up information and $2+ billion dollars.

So the guy Trump was alleging was controlling US politicians back in 2015, got arrested by Trump’s ally, MBS, on charges of corruption and money laundering.

One of the first things Trump did as POTUS, was go after Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, in Saudi Arabia.

6) Fast-forward to 2025:

Trump and MBS have a stellar relationship, and Trump is beloved in Saudi Arabia.

Why? Because I think Trump had something to do with King Salman and Crown Prince MBS rooting corruption out of their country in 2017, and I think the corruption there in Saudi Arabia, is related to the corruption here in the US.

Trump alleged that Al-Waleed bin Talal was controlling US politicians with Saudi money.

Now the questions are, which politicians were under Al-Waleed’s control, for how long, and to what effect?

I’ve got a few guesses.