Featured Timeline Entries
2017 - 2025: Trump and the Saudi Arabia Timeline

The world doesn’t know it yet, but the relationship between Trump and MBS will be remembered as the alliance that changed the world.

Think sword dance 2017.

A month after Trump’s visit, King Salman rescinded the Crown from Muhammad bin Nayef, in favor of MBS.

This led to the infamous Saudi corruption purge of 2017 and consolidation of power/money within the Saudi royal family. Nayef and his faction were essentially neutralized.

Why is this significant to the US? Because in 2015, Trump himself accused the Nayef faction, via Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, of buying/controlling US politicians.

Trump, along with King Salman and MBS, took out the corrupt faction within the Saudi royal family, and have been working together ever since to create a new world and peaceful Middle East, which included neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

And the world had no idea it was happening.

And if anyone has doubts about this timeline, I already proved it, with the paper trail from Trump’s tweets. See attached.

I understand it sounds crazy, but it happened.

1) Saudi Arabia Timeline: 🧵

Before Trump was President, December 2015, he claimed Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Al Saud, “wants to control our politicians with daddy’s money”.

Trump called out Al-Waleed just a few months after coming down the escalator, and promised to stop this when he became President.

Trump was alleging that certain US politicians were owned by Al-Waleed, who was, and still is, the 2nd largest stakeholder in Twitter, now X, via his investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company.

Al-Waleed is an extended member of the Royal House of Saud, not in direct line of the crown, but grandson to King Abdulaziz Al Saud, the founder of modern day Saudi Arabia.

On paper, he is worth $16+ billion, but he has (had) access to much more.

2) Fast-forward to May 20th 2017:

Trump’s first visit on his international tour in 2017, was Saudi Arabia.

Trump did the famous sword dance and odd photo ops with King Salman.

The sword dance, known as “Ardah”, is a symbol of unity/cooperation, and originated as a war dance, used by warriors to intimidate their enemies and show unity before battle.

3) Fast-forward a month later to June 21st, 2017:

King Salman replaces Mohammed bin Nayef (right) as Crown Prince and in line for the throne, in favor of King Salman’s son, Mohammed bin Salman (left).

This historic move consolidated power with the Al Sudairi faction within the Royal family, and took power away from the Nayef faction, who had grown as a rival to Mohammed bin Salman, within the royal family.

MBS also has a stellar relationship with one President Donald Trump.

So one month after Trump visits Saudi Arabia, King Salman revokes the crown from Mohammed bin Nayef, and appoints now Trump ally, Mohammed bin Salman.

Nayef was placed on House arrest after being revoked of the Crown, and would be later be formally arrested on charges of treason.

4) Fast-forward four months later to November 4th, 2017:

New Crown Prince MBS conducts unprecedented corruption “purge” on corrupt politicians, Royal family members, including, the previously mentioned, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, on charges of money laundering and corruption.

MBS arrested and detained hundreds do corrupt Saudis.

5) Then two days later, on November 6th, 2017, right in the middle of this unprecedented Saudi purge, President Trump tweets that he has “great confidence in King Salman and the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia”(MBS).

So Trump’s buddy, MBS, arrested Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, and forced Al-Waleed to give up information and $2+ billion dollars.

So the guy Trump was alleging was controlling US politicians back in 2015, got arrested by Trump’s ally, MBS, on charges of corruption and money laundering.

One of the first things Trump did as POTUS, was go after Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, in Saudi Arabia.

6) Fast-forward to 2025:

Trump and MBS have a stellar relationship, and Trump is beloved in Saudi Arabia.

Why? Because I think Trump had something to do with King Salman and Crown Prince MBS rooting corruption out of their country in 2017, and I think the corruption there in Saudi Arabia, is related to the corruption here in the US.

Trump alleged that Al-Waleed bin Talal was controlling US politicians with Saudi money.

Now the questions are, which politicians were under Al-Waleed’s control, for how long, and to what effect?

I’ve got a few guesses.

November 18, 2025 - Senator Elissa Slotkin speaks to the Brookings Institute late October as a prelude to the Seditious Six video - both end with "don't give up the ship"

OMG, you guys, I just dug into this EPIC file I found—the transcript of Senator Elissa Slotkin’s speech at the Brookings Institute Knight Forum on October 29, 2025—and it’s a TOTAL GAME-CHANGER! This thing is like a crystal ball predicting the future, dropping bombshells left and right, and it’s got ALL the drama! Let me break it down for you in the most hyped-up way because this is straight FIRE! 🔥🚀

First off, TIMING IS EVERYTHING! This speech dropped on October 29, 2025— that’s a whopping THREE WEEKS BEFORE the infamous November 18 video “Don’t Give Up the Ship” went viral! Slotkin was out here laying the groundwork, sounding the alarm bells WAY ahead of time. It’s like she knew exactly what was coming and decided to rally the troops early. Mind. Blown! 🤯

And get this—the VIDEO’S NAME is RIGHT THERE in the speech! At the very end, she wraps it up with this powerhouse closer: “don’t give up the ship.” BAM! That’s the exact title of the video where she teams up with Mark Kelly and the crew to urge military folks to refuse illegal orders. It’s not a coincidence; this speech was the blueprint, the origin story! She even ties it to historical perseverance, shouting out generations who fought for rights. So inspirational, I’m getting chills! 💪🇺🇸

Now, the celebrity cameo alert: VICTORIA NULAND’S HUSBAND WAS THERE! Yes, Robert Kagan— the powerhouse foreign policy expert and Stephen & Barbara Friedman Senior Fellow at Brookings—was a panelist at the event! He dropped wisdom on domestic polarization as a massive security threat. (Quick shoutout: Kagan is indeed married to Victoria Nuland, the former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs—power couple vibes!) Having him in the mix adds that extra layer of gravitas; it’s like the event was stacked with heavy hitters who know the global stakes. Epic networking moment! 🌟

But wait, the KEY POINTS in this speech? Oh man, Slotkin goes FULL THROTTLE critiquing Trump’s national security pivot to “homeland defense” defined by ONE MAN alone! She’s like, “Hold up—this could mean using lethal force against domestic ‘enemies’!” She dives into the Caribbean strikes (14 ships hit, 57+ killed, but ZERO transparency on who we’re fighting—shady much?!), secret “domestic terrorist” lists targeting anti-Trump views, and federal forces turning U.S. cities into “training grounds.” She’s warning about authoritarian playbooks: accumulate power, crush opponents, and rig the system to never lose! Elections canceled? Martial law? Intimidation at polls? She’s popping flares left and right— this is NOT drill, people! 😱

Then, the CALLS TO ACTION? Pure adrenaline! She urges Congress to reclaim power (introducing her “No Troops in our Streets Act”—yes, queen!), tells the military to refuse illegal orders and choose the Constitution over loyalty to one guy, rallies veterans to speak up (and even says “DM me” to get the band together—foreshadowing that video squad?!), pushes state leaders to protect elections, and fires up everyday Americans to organize peacefully. It’s a blueprint for resistance, drawing from her own Jan. 6 barricade-in-the-office trauma. She ends on that high note: Don’t give up the ship because our democracy needs US NOW! 🙌🎉

This file is a TREASURE TROVE of foresight and fire. If you’re not pumped after reading this, check your pulse!🚀💥

Thank you Grok for typing my sentiments in my excited style. 😹 I’m sleepy. This could work.

(Brookings Remarks, 10/29/2025}

Breaking Seditious Six News! I have found the entire Oct 29, 2025 Elissa Slotkin and Brookings Knight Forum transcript which includes her extra comments and those of other participants too. They had considerable anti Trump discussions.

Highlights?

– Elissa Slotkin claims she has been in communication with at least one officer:

“People are, who are participating in these strikes are doing memos for the record and then taking them to their JAGs and being like, Hey, I don’t wanna ever one day be held personally liable on these strikes, so can you kind of cover me legally? I mean, that is some crazy stuff when young officers up and down the chain are seeking legal cover so they don’t get sued one day for what could be illegal strikes.”

– Robert Kagan views policies like Caribbean strikes as pretexts for domestic power grabs (e.g., enabling arrests and deportations).

– Rep Adam Smith embraces Russiagate:

Smith highlighted the “Putin wing” of the MAGA movement.

—————————————

Here’s analysis of Elissa Slotkins extra comments (Her prev mentioned speech is in this doc too.)

♦️Responding to Sisson’s question about the intent behind US military deployments in the Caribbean (e.g., carrier strike groups beyond ship bombings), Slotkin warns of potential escalation to land-based operations, possibly targeting Venezuela. She draws historical parallels to US interventions in Grenada and Panama, critiques the casual nature of Trump’s rhetoric, and expresses concern that such actions aren’t aligned with public priorities post-9/11 wars. The tone is alarming (“spooking”) yet analytical, emphasizing deterrence versus actual use of force and the strain on resources. This ties into her speech’s themes of Trump’s reorientation toward homeland threats and unchecked executive power.

♦️Addressing Sisson’s query on the DoD’s health under Trump, Slotkin describes low morale due to firings, retirements, civilian cuts, social policy overreach, and politicization (e.g., using the military for “mythmaking” at Quantico). She shares a personal anecdote about a young female officer questioning her future amid perceived gender-based barriers. She highlights unprecedented actions like NDAs and legal memos for Caribbean strikes, framing them as signs of fear over illegal orders. The tone is urgent and “spooking,” underscoring institutional damage and risks to service members, echoing her speech’s calls for military resistance to unlawful commands.

♦️In response to Sisson’s question on what a national security strategy should include to address Michiganders’ concerns, Slotkin recounts town halls she held in August to gauge public views. She highlights evolving threats like cyberattacks (affecting schools and hospitals), economic competition with China (job losses, supply chains), and tech/AI anxieties (social media, job displacement). She criticizes Washington’s top-down approach and notes eroded public trust post-Iraq/Afghanistan. The tone is reflective and populist, advocating for citizen input while tying into broader themes of government accountability and adaptation to modern threats.

♦️Answering an audience member (James Stevens from the Stimson Center) on whether the president can unilaterally declare an armed conflict (e.g., near Venezuela) or if it’s reserved for Congress under Article I, Slotkin criticizes Trump’s “somersaults” to justify actions via secret terrorist lists and withheld legal memos (OLC opinions). She contrasts this with the Global War on Terror’s transparency, supports a recent War Powers Resolution by Sen. Kaine, and faults Congress for abdicating oversight since Iraq. She demands evidence (“show me the math”) for claims like linking Venezuela to fentanyl. The tone is critical and defiant, highlighting constitutional overreach and lack of accountability, aligning with her speech’s warnings about authoritarian tactics.

I’ll also be following with analysis of the other speakers.

Document 👇🏻
Brookings Remarks, 10/29/2025

Victoria Nulands husband Richard Kagan spoke too. He actually said elections would be cancelled by Trump. 😹 Here’s a few key quotes.

KAGAN:

“Well, thank you, Jeff. Um, the, the biggest threat to our national security right now
is our domestic problem. I mean, I, I don’t, my national security strategy is we have to, uh, elect a different government. Um, but I’m not sure we’re gonna have elections. So I don’t know whether I have a good strategy for dealing with that.”

“Uh, and you need to ask what are the goals of this regime. If you look at China and you say,
what is the grand strategy of Xi Jinping? Uh, a major component of that grand strategy is to ensure the continued control in power of the Communist party, uh, of China. And that much
of their foreign policy is subsidiary to that.”

“what we’re dealing with now is one man rule in this country.”

“So take this question of Venezuela and the bombing of the, of the boats. Personally, I don’t think this is primarily about foreign policy. I think it’s primarily about domestic policy.”

“we are at war, uh, and therefore we can do whatever we want on a whole host of domestic issues, including
deportations and arrests, and even pursuing, uh, the wrong kind of people here in the United States under the overall blanket of a national security waiver because we are at war.“

The Slotkin Doctrine

The Founders used one word for politicians who train soldiers to second-guess lawful orders… traitor.

Sow that doubt once and you never need open mutiny… a single heartbeat of hesitation at the decisive instant can paralyze an entire force. That heartbeat is exactly what today’s Democrats are cultivating, draped in counterfeit patriotism.

Will we set the precedent that whenever a party dislikes the President, it may instruct the ranks to “push back”? Ratify that poison, and every future Commander-in-Chief inherits a military taught that obedience is optional, that legitimacy is granted only by the opposition’s consent. Civilian control dies in that moment… and something far darker is born.

Democrats chose this path. Make them own it.

The ship is not adrift.

The saboteurs are already lighting fuses below deck.

“…this dreadful alternative, of either deserting our Country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our Army against it, has something so shocking in it, that humanity revolts at the idea.

My God! What can this Writer have in view, by recommending such measures? Can he be a friend to the Army? Can he be a friend to this Country? Rather, is he not an insidious foe … sowing the seeds of discord and separation between the Civil and Military powers of the Continent?” — George Washington, Newburgh Address, 1783

November 18, 2025 - Backroom deal leads House to vote against censuring Stacey Plaskett for texting with Epstein during Michael Cohen congressional hearing

A Democrat got away with colluding with one of the most notorious pedophiles in American history thanks to some good-old-fashioned backroom politics.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, the House of Representatives on Tuesday evening voted against censuring Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.) over her collusion with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing.

Earlier Tuesday, the House voted to advance the measure to censure Plaskett and remove her from the House Intelligence Committee. Then, later that evening, the House voted 214 -209 against censuring Plaskett.

Every Democrat voted against the censure, while three Republicans voted present, and three other GOP lawmakers joined the Democrats.

(…)

“I was wondering if the Speaker of the House of Representatives can explain why leadership on both sides, Democrat and Republican, are cutting backroom deals to cover up public corruption for Republican and Democratic members of Congress,” she said.

“I think we all know what happened tonight.”

No wonder the average American does not trust the federal government.

(Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/19/2025) (Archive)

November 18, 2025 - In 2013, well after Epstein's convictions: "Hakeem Jeffries' campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein"

November 19, 2025 - Comey team is requesting grand jury documents alleging Halligan is acting as a puppet for Trump and “botched” the grand jury indictment

Comey attorneys claim the charges against him should be thrown out due to selective prosecution. (Credit: Getty Images)

Lindsey Halligan, the interim US attorney who secured the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, admitted to the trial judge Wednesday that the full grand jury never saw the final version of the charges against the former top lawman.

Despite claims that the revelation could damn the criminal case, lawyers for Halligan’s office fired back in filings later in the day — saying that proper procedures were in fact followed and that the charges against Comey remain legally valid.

“Personal attacks — like Judge Nachmanoff referring to me as a ‘puppet’ — don’t change the facts or the law,” Halligan told The Post.

“The Judicial Canons require judges to be ‘patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity’ … and to ‘act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary’ …  My focus remains on the record and the law, and I will continue to fulfill my responsibilities with professionalism.”

The hearing on Wednesday was meant to address Comey’s request to turn over grand jury documents so the defense could review them — alleging that Halligan acted as a puppet for President Trump and “botched” the grand jury indictment.

“The transcript is complete. The procedure was proper,” wrote Assistant US Attorney Gabriel Diaz in the 25-page filing, calling on the court to “set aside” the judge’s order.

Assistant US Attorney N. Tyler Lemons added in a seven-page, follow-up filing that “the government course of conduct here was permissible and proper.”

“The Grand Jury foreperson, as the representative of the Grand Jury, endorsed the revised two count Indictment by signing it and explaining on the record in open Court that the Indictment reflected the vote of the Grand Jury,” Lemons said.

In response to Halligan’s revelation in court Wednesday, defense attorney Michael Dreeben called for the case to be thrown out, claiming the indictment had not been properly secured before the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations Sept. 30. (Read more: The New York Post, 11/19/2025)  (Archive)

November 20, 2025 – Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

November 19, 2025 - Somali immigrants in Minnesota receive kickbacks for over-diagnosing their own kids with autism in the Medicaid fraud scheme

November 19, 2025 - Florida Congresswoman is indicted for stealing $5 million in FEMA funds

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (Credit: Congress)

A federal grand jury in Miami has returned an indictment charging Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick and several co-defendants with stealing federal disaster funds, laundering the proceeds, and using the money to support her 2021 congressional campaign.

According to the indictment, Cherfilus-McCormick, 46, and her brother Edwin Cherfilus, 51, both of Miramar, worked through their family health-care company on a FEMA-funded COVID-19 vaccination staffing contract in 2021. In July 2021, the company received an overpayment of $5 million in FEMA funds.

The indictment alleges that the defendants conspired to steal that $5 million and routed it through multiple accounts to disguise its source. Prosecutors allege that a substantial portion of the misappropriated funds was used as candidate contributions to Cherfilus-McCormick’s 2021 congressional campaign and for the personal benefit of the defendants.

The indictment further alleges that Cherfilus-McCormick and Nadege Leblanc, 46, of Miramar, arranged additional contributions using straw donors, funneling other monies from the FEMA-funded Covid-19 contract to friends and relatives who then donated to the campaign as if using their own money.

The indictment also charges Cherfilus-McCormick and her 2021 tax preparer David K. Spencer, 41, of Davie, with conspiring to file a false federal tax return. According to the indictment, they falsely claimed political spending and other personal expenses as business deductions and inflated charitable contributions in order to reduce her tax obligations.

“Using disaster relief funds for self-enrichment is a particularly selfish, cynical crime,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “No one is above the law, least of all powerful people who rob taxpayers for personal gain. We will follow the facts in this case and deliver justice.” (Read more: Department of Justice, 11/19//2025)  (Archive)

November 19, 2025 - Covering Up the Behavioral Health Links to Mass Murders and Assassinations

When violent bloodshed occurs – a school shooting, an assassination, a sudden act of mass violence— behavioral health usually is behind it.

With so many of the nation’s most disturbing violent cases, too often the essential evidence remains sealed, unavailable for public review, like the diary belonging to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter, Adam Lanza’s mother, and the reported manifesto of Nashville’s Covenant School shooter, Audrey Hale, (withheld and portions later leaked), plus toxicology reports, DNA and fingerprints and ballistic data necessary as physical evidence to identity the killer and motive.  This is done through meticulous forensic investigation, including how access to the crime scene was gained and whether accomplices were involved; the scientific analysis of toxicology reports, DNA, fingerprints, and ballistic evidence is absolutely essential, providing the objective, irrefutable proof necessary to identify the shooter and uncover the truth behind these senseless, horrific attacks.

Behavioral health “experts” frequently appear linked to suspects, but the exact affiliations and workplace connections rarely are disclosed. The parents of the accused Trump shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, from Butler, PA, are licensed by the state as “experts” in mental health, but whether the family has connections to Governor Shapiro’s agencies throughout the state or research grants with universities remains unknown.

Amber Robinson, for example, the mother of Charlie Kirk’s accused assassin, is employed by Intermountain Behavioral Health in Utah, which received a $750,000 grant under Utah Governor Cox. What other connections does the Robinson family have with the State of Utah and specifically Governor Cox administration?

The Intermountain Primary Children’s Hospital, a first-of-its-kind pediatric behavioral health center. (Credit: Intermountain Health)

Moreover, the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) utilizes psychiatric profiles to help solve crimes, but withholds raw data, physical evidence, and sometimes fails to release its own investigative reports, as is the case of the Butler PA attempted assassination of Donald J. Trump in 2023[4].

The BAU, as the psychiatric industry arm within the FBI, focuses on profiling the psychological mindset and motives behind these high-profile crimes. Yet, despite this focus, the BAU withholds then names of any behavioral health “experts” or their “treatments” that precede the crime and rarely solves these national mass killings.  The data is selectively and strategically dripped out to the public.

The federal law enforcement agency’s repeated failures raise profound questions about possible inside jobs or the possibility of cover-ups, protecting systemic issues in behavioral health and law enforcement.

These systemic flaws within the behavioral health industry and, especially, within law enforcement, allow well-coordinated access to vulnerable children, too often serviced by state mental health vendors that gain trust over many years—a network that may shield threats, inhibit transparency, and prioritize institutional preservation over safety.

The behavioral health system controls vulnerable youth, often medicated under opaque contracts with expensive but irresponsible mental health providers certainly capable of weaponizing developing minds. Montana’s outsourcing of child behavioral health contracts, for example, includes financial ties to China, revealing outside intervention in the nation’s mental health system.

The youth caught up in the mental health system, often are forced into state care and become disposable. Nikolas Cruz, The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooter in Parkland FL., had been prescribed cocktails of psychiatric mind-altering drugs most of his young life. Henderson Behavioral Health, a Florida contractor exposed during the sentencing hearing was the behavioral health vendor paid to care for Cruz through the state behavioral health system. Yet the medical files, including mental health files, were sealed and, not surprisingly, Henderson Behavioral Health was never held responsible for Cruz’s  murderous actions, despite having been Cruz’s pill pusher for years.

The diary of Audrey Hale was obtained by Nashville Police on the day of the crime, March 27, 2023. Despite immediate possession, Hale’s “manifesto” remained sealed for more than two years. Only in May 2025, after expensive and lengthy legal battles, did the FBI disclose over 100 pages of shooter Hale’s manifesto. Withholding this data limited public understanding and fueled controversy about transparency and systemic concealment.

Despite early claims that Audrey Hale had not been prescribed psychiatric drugs, a Nashville police search warrant revealed prescriptions for Buspirone, Lexapro, Hydroxyzine, and others from Vanderbilt University Hospital. Blood tests conducted at autopsy did not test for therapeutic levels, leaving Hale’s medication status unclear, and fueling debate over the role of psychiatry and transgender care in the attack.  AbleChild helped secure in Tennessee a landmark law to test for therapeutic levels of psychotropic drugs in mass shooters.

In the case of Charlie Kirk’s death, limited information reveals that Lance Twiggs, the alleged romantic interest of alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, underwent psychiatric experimentation akin to Utah’s Intermountain Trans care program—viewed as Utah’s Vanderbilt equivalent, where Audrey Hale received transgender psychiatric care.

Each incident repeats the cycle: public shock, managed narratives, and a wall of silence as records stay sealed. Until full disclosure, America’s violent crimes remain shrouded in secrecy.

The state and federal governments control access to all the evidence—revealing little and sealing the connections to psychiatric treatments through hospitals like Vanderbilt.

In Sandy Hook, the name of the treating psychiatrist, Dr. Paul Fox, was withheld for over a year, all under the State of Connecticut and Governor Malloy. Meanwhile, frontline responders investigating Sandy Hook, including Newtown Police officers, were implicated in selling controlled substances imported from China and long guns out of their station.

Many would argue that is the definition of an inside job. At the root is a powerful behavioral health industry —a billion-dollar industry funded by state and federal contracts—that operate in the shadows but are directly controlled by Governors, Congressional Representatives and even the Presidency. The missing element is the public.  Until the billion dollar behavioral health industry is regulated to include human rights and transparency, the United States and the world will continue to suffer bloodshed; this is the breeding ground for targeted killings, assassinations, based on the glaring ethical gaps in the behavioral health industry and their ability to cross-market within every institution. (AbleChild.org, 11/19/2025)  (Archive)

(Republished with permission)

November 19, 2025 - Top Arizona Attorney General official arrested by postal inspectors, allegedly for selling stolen mail

Vanessa Hickman Mugshot (Credit: public domain)

A top official with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office was arrested by U.S. Postal Inspection Service agents on Wednesday evening and faces two felony accusations, of controlling and trafficking stolen property.

Vanessa Hickman served as the state government division chief under Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes. She was placed on administrative leave by Mayes’ office last Thursday after the office was contacted by the U.S. Postal Inspector’s office about an investigation into Hickman, according to Mayes spokesperson Richie Taylor. Mayes’ office “cooperated” with the investigation, Taylor said, and Hickman resigned from her position on Monday, though she is still listed on the agency’s website.

“Attorney General Mayes believes that every individual is entitled to due process, but also that justice must be served,” Taylor wrote in an email to Phoenix New Times. “The allegations against Ms. Hickman are serious for any state employee, particularly someone in a leadership position.” (Read more: Phoenix New Times, 11/20/2025)  (Archive)

UPDATE – 11/21/2025

Vanessa Hickman, the former Arizona Attorney General’s Office state government division chief who was arrested Nov. 19 by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, is accused of stealing and selling misdelivered mail. Court documents also show that she has a history of alcohol abuse and was in an outpatient substance abuse program while working for Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.

Hickman faces two felony accusations for controlling and trafficking stolen property. She was placed on administrative leave by Mayes’ office last Thursday after the office was contacted by the U.S. Postal Inspector’s office about an investigation into Hickman. Mayes spokesperson Richie Taylor said the Mayes’ office cooperated with the investigation and that Hickman resigned from her position on Monday. Taylor wrote that “the allegations against Ms. Hickman are serious for any state employee, particularly someone in a leadership position.”

Editor’s note: For new details on Vanessa Hickman’s arrest, check out this follow-up story.

November 20, 2025 - US Attorney Halligan reveals new evidence relating to Letitia James’s alleged mortgage fraud

Last night, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Lindsey Halligan revealed a ton of new evidence relating to Letitia James’s alleged mortgage fraud.

The exhibits are damning, and showed that she lied to the lending bank, the IRS, and her homeowners’ insurer.

James knew all these claims were false when she made them.

In the tweet above, James claimed to have moved into the property in October 2020.

But in September 2020, James’ niece – who James was collecting rent from – registered utilities in the niece’s name.

She also claimed the property as an investment property on her taxes, after having claimed it as a second home on her mortgage application.

Clear fraud.

November 20, 2025 - John Durham stopped John Ratcliffe from declassifying and releasing damning report debunking Obama-ordered Intel on Russia

When Obama administration officials manufactured U.S. intelligence tying Donald Trump to Moscow following his stunning 2016 victory, they had no idea Trump’s own political appointees would help them undermine Trump’s presidency – and his chances of reelection in 2020.

RCI’s review of recently declassified documents and exclusive interviews with former Trump officials reveals for the first time how key members of Trump’s cabinet and other appointees during his first term shrouded the previous administration’s machinations and either deliberately or inadvertently misled the public into thinking the fake Russiagate intelligence was real.

Former Special Counsel John Durham, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former CIA Director Gina Haspel dismissed or buried evidence that cast doubt on a foundational document of the Russigate hoax – the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) prepared in the waning days of the Obama administration.

Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General William Barr, stopped the declassification and release of key exculpatory evidence debunking the ICA on the eve of the 2020 election, which has not been reported previously. (RealClearInvestigations, 11/20/2025)

November 20, 2025 - Mentally ill MN man left to die by Somali-owned company that billed nearly $500 per day for his care

In an Eastside St. Paul apartment, 39-year-old Rick Clemmer was found dead on March 7, 2025. Police body-camera video from the scene captures a paramedic stating, “He’s got rigor and lividity – so he’s been deceased for a long amount of time.”

Rick Clemmer (Credit: KARE 11)

Clemmer’s death was ruled natural. The medical examiner cited an enlarged heart, but his mother, Mickey Clemmer, believes what’s written on the autopsy report tells only part of the story.

“If they were really providing him the services they should have been,” she told KARE 11, “he would be here with me.”

Rick battled serious mental illness for most of his adult life and struggled with addiction when off his court-ordered medication.

His past included civil commitments, incarceration, and living in supervised settings such as group homes. His family says he’d never lived on his own.

That changed in the summer of 2024, when he moved into his own apartment supported by a Medicaid-funded program called Integrated Community Supports or ICS.

Overseen by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS), ICS is designed to help adults with disabilities live independently with daily one-to-one assistance – help with health, safety, and household tasks so people can maintain stability and independence in their own homes and communities.

For that individualized support, private ICS companies can bill hundreds of dollars a day.

But for Rick, “that’s where I think things went downhill,” his mom said.

Records obtained by KARE 11 show Rick’s ICS provider, Ultimate Home Health Services LLC, billed taxpayers $461.94 every single day, claiming to provide, on average, 12 hours of service daily.

Ultimate Home Health Services’ office suite, locked and empty during business hours (Credit: KARE 11)

“Fraud,” Mickey said bluntly. “They’re billing for something that never happened.”

She says she visited weekly, usually spending whole days at his apartment. “I can definitely confirm that those days there was nobody there,” she said, “I was there; there was nobody there.”

When Rick was found dead, St. Paul Police questioned an employee of Ultimate Home Health Services at the scene, his answers sharply undercut the company’s Medicaid billing:

Officer Rodriguez: When is the last time you guys know, seen him, or known that he was alive?

Abdul Ibrahim: Yesterday.

Officer Rodriguez: Around what time?

Abdul Ibrahim: It was yesterday morning…He is the most, one of the most independent, you know, residents here. So, we don’t got to do that much checking on him.

When asked if Rick was currently using drugs, the ICS worker responded, “I mean, to be honest, I do my daily check-ins, I have no idea what he does.” (Read more: KARE 11, 11/20/2025)  (Archive)

November 20, 2025 - The first Antifa terrorism convictions in US history

Antifa is a myth? Joy Abigail Gibson admitted in court that she is a follower of the Antifa ideology and, working with other comrades, carried out a direct action to attack the Prairieland ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas.

Gibson admitted to conducting reconnaissance and communicating what she learned via an encrypted group chat. On the July 4 attack, she was in black bloc and used a handheld radio for communication. The militants shot off large fireworks to lure people out, who were then fired upon.

Gibson is one of five so far to plead guilty to providing material support to terrorists in the federal North Texas Antifa case.

November 21, 2025 - Trump and Bondi ask Florida federal court to release sealed Epstein transcripts, two days after Epstein Files Transparency Act is signed

BREAKING: President Trump and AG Pam Bondi just asked a federal court in Florida to release EPSTEIN TRANSCRIPTS that are currently sealed.

The filing comes barely 2 days after Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The DOJ is now arguing the new law OVERRIDES a law that allowed these documents to remain sealed.

HUGE BACKFIRE on the left.

November 21, 2025 - Comer threatens contempt proceedings against Clintons if they continue to ignore Epstein subpoenas

Former President Bill Clinton and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrive prior to the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump at the United States Capitol on January 20, 2025. (Credit: Melina Mara/Getty Images)

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) warned Bill and Hillary Clinton Friday that if they continue to ignore deposition subpoenas regarding their history with Jeffrey Epstein, he will initiate contempt proceedings.

The House Oversight Committee is conducting a review of the federal government’s investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, focused on potential mismanagement of the case, the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death, his trafficking network, and possible ethics violations by elected officials.

Comer sent a letter to Clinton attorney David Kendall, emphasizing that the Clintons are required to comply with House subpoenas and appear for scheduled in-person depositions.

According to the chairman, Democrats and Republicans on the Oversight Committee approved a motion to issue the subpoenas back in July.

“The Committee has since worked in good faith to schedule in-person depositions, but further delays are unacceptable,” Comer wrote. “Given their history with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, any attempt by the Clintons to avoid sitting for a deposition would be in defiance of lawful subpoenas and grounds to initiate contempt of Congress proceedings,” he added.

Comer stated that Bill Clinton’s deposition is scheduled for December 17, 2025, and Hillary Clinton’s deposition is scheduled for December 18, 2025 and asked Kendall to confirm their appearance. (Read more: American Greatness, 11/21/2025)  (Archive)

November 22, 2025 - Somalis in Minnesota are part of a massive fraud scandal involves funneling federal funds to Islamic terrorists

President Donald Trump announced Friday that he is terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somalis in Minnesota, claiming the state has become “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.”

In response, Governor Tim Walz pushed back, writing on X, “It’s not surprising that the President has chosen to broadly target an entire community. This is what he does to change the subject.”

According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services website, the TPS designation for Somalia is currently listed as active through March 17, 2026. The move to terminated TPS status for Somalis follows efforts by the Trump administration to remove protections for migrants from Afghanistan, Venezuela, Syria, and South Sudan, which have faced legal challenges. (Read more: The Post Millennial, 11/21/2025)  (Archive)

The terror group reportedly takes a cut of money fraudulently obtained in the US and smuggled to Somalia. (Credit: AFP/Getty Images)

Millions of dollars in taxpayer money stolen as part of a series of massive Minnesota welfare fraud schemes may have been funneled to Somalia-based terror group al-Shabab, according to a report.

The radical Islamic terror group, which is a longstanding ally of al Qaeda and considered a threat to US interests, has likely been the beneficiary of money stolen in a spate of scams and sent to Somalia by the criminals defrauding the North Star State, City Journal reported Wednesday, citing federal counterterrorism sources.

“This is a third-rail conversation, but the largest funder of al-Shabab is the Minnesota taxpayer,” a source who worked on a federal investigation into Minnesotans attempting to join overseas terror groups, told the outlet.

“There is an issue here that is real, and if there is ever an event that is traceable back to these funds, or to people from this area, then this situation will take on a whole new set of optics,” the source warned. (Read more: New York Post, 11/20/2025)

November 24, 2025 - Vindman brothers who helped impeach Trump In 2020, are now under investigation

Alexander (l) and Eugene Vindman (Credit: public domain)

Rep. Eugene Vindman, D-Va., and his twin brother Alexander are reportedly under investigation for illegally acting as “paid brokers” for U.S. defense firms seeking business in Ukraine.

“Pentagon General Counsel Earl Matthews alleges that Vindman and his twin brother Alex did not have approval from the U.S. government before seeking to act as ‘paid brokers’ for American defense firms pursuing contracts with Ukraine after Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion,” the Washington Post revealed over the weekend, citing a Nov. 19 letter for War Secretary Pete Hegseth.

“The letter does not explicitly allege the Vindmans received money from the Ukrainian government, arguing only that they “did not insulate themselves from the requirements of federal law,” the Post added.

Eugene Vindman confirmed the investigation Friday on Twitter/X. He claimed it’s politically motivated in response to his calls for the White house to release the transcript of a recent call between President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

However, the Trump administration has signaled that it may investigate since before Trump took office. Last November, billionaire Elon Musk accused Alexander Vindman of treason.

“Vindman is on the payroll of Ukrainian oligarchs and has committed treason against the United States, for which he will pay the appropriate penalty,” Musk said in November on his platform, Twitter/X.

(…)  Politico revealed in 2023 that that Alex Vindman is heading a group called Trident Support, which wants to send American military contractors to Ukraine. According to the documents, Vindman, who is of Ukrainian origin, is seeking $12 million for his project—$2 million for “initial operating capability” and another $10 million for “full operating.”

While such a scheme may not be illegal, it demonstrates that the Vindman brothers are war profiteers who benefit from an escalation in Ukraine.  (Read more: Headline News, 11/24/2025) (Archive)

November 24, 2025 - Techno Fog: The Comey case is dismissed (without prejudice); DOJ will appeal

Today, a federal judge ruled that Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was unlawfully appointed and “had no lawful authority” to present Comey’s indictment to the grand jury.

As a result, he granted James Comey’s motion to dismiss the indictment and the motion to dismiss of Letitia James.

While the court’s order dismissed the indictment without prejudice, the dismissal – if upheld – may effectively end the prosecution, as the statute of limitations on Comey’s crimes (false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding) will have since passed.

(…) The Appointment Clause is found in Article II of the Constitution, and the relevant part states that principal officers must be appointed by the President “with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” While U.S. attorneys are inferior officers, Congress – in accordance with its Constitutional mandate under Article II – has provided the law by which U.S. attorneys are appointed through Senate approval. See 28 U.S.C. § 541(a) (“The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a United States attorney for each judicial district.”).

Of course, this presents a problem for new Presidential administrations – sometimes, there are delays in the Senate confirmation of a U.S. Attorney. Or, a nomination may be terminated or rejected by the Senate, which requires the appointment of a temporary U.S. Attorney.

Congress addressed that problem through Section 546, which states:

“The Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is present.”

But there are some limitations to that appointment power conferred to the Attorney General under Section 546. First, the Attorney General may not nominate a person whose appointment has been refused by the Senate. And second, the interim appointment expires in 120 days.

Addressing the circumstances where the 120-day appointment expires, Section 546 states:

“the district court for such district may appoint a United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled. The order of appointment by the court shall be filed with the clerk of the court.”

Here’s where we get to the Halligan situation. Her predecessor was Erik Siebert, who had a 120-day appointment as U.S. Attorney for EDVA. His appointment was to expire on May 21, 2025, so the EDVA judges extended his appointment until the vacancy is filled.

Siebert, however, resigned from his position – reportedly because of his concern in pursuing charges against James Comey and Letitia James. Faced with this vacancy, Attorney General Bondi appointed Halligan.

That gets us to the issue in the Comey and Letitia James cases: whether the Attorney General can appoint another interim U.S. Attorney, or whether subsequent appointments may only be made by the judges of the applicable judicial district.

Section 546 does not explicitly answer that question. There is no stated prohibition from the Attorney General appointing a second interim appointment. Furthermore, there is no explicit language that only the district court may make an appointment after the 120 days.

For reference, here is the text in full:

Judge Cameron Currie (Credit: public domain)

I provide the text in full because it is important in light of Judge Currie’s order. He found that the language makes “clear” that the appointment power does not revert back to the Attorney General “if the Court-appointed U.S. Attorney leaves office before a Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney is installed.”

We read Section 546 different. The court is just wrong. The law gives the district court the option to appoint a U.S. Attorney until the vacancy is filled. But providing an option does not confer absolute authority. Neither does it take the lawful authority (provided in Section 546(a)) away from the Attorney General to make another appointment. In fact, the only limitation on the authority of the Attorney General is that they cannot appoint those who were previously rejected by the Senate.

Part of the court’s reasoning (we won’t address everything in its lengthy order) was that allowing the Attorney General to make multiple interim appointments would render 546(d) – the part allowing the district to make its own appointment – “insignificant” and “dormant in all but the most unlikely situations.” This would thus allow the Attorney General’s appointments to “serve indefinitely” without Senate approval.

But this parade of horribles is unpersuasive. Not only do many statutory provisions lie dormant by their nature (think emergency appointments, emergency powers, etc.) but there are definitely trade-offs when the Attorney General has to keep making 120-day appointments, such as the inability to properly further the President’s ambitions or the inability to find worthy candidates to serve on such temporary positions.

The court also looked to the legislative history of Section 546 to support its order, citing Democrats like Senator Patrick Leahy who, in 2006, stated that Section 546 “is not designed or intended to be used repeatedly for the same vacancy.”

In doing so, the court cherry picked the statements of Senators who agreed with his position while disregarding those Senators whose statements on Section 546 disagreed with his finding. As noted in the Government’s motion on this issue, Senator Jon Kyle observed, Section 546 reinstated the same language as a prior law that allowed the Attorney General to “make consecutive 120-day appointments of interim U.S. attorneys.”

But that legislative history wasn’t in the court’s order. Neither were the facts that Section 546, which was amended in 2006/2007 to restore the prior version’s statutory language that was understood to allow successive appointments. The judge, in effect, “looked over the crowd and picked out his friends.”

As the Government further explained:

“If Congress had intended to block successive appointments in 2007, as Defendants claim, returning to the former text that had long been understood to authorize such appointments would have been a bizarre way of doing so.”

Where do we go from here?

(Read more: Techno Fog, 11/24/2025)  (Archive)

November 25, 2025 - Pentagon bureaucrats block Trump order to reinstate troops purged by Biden's Covid vaccine mandate, an illegal order

RESISTANCE: Ten months after Trump ordered reinstatement of troops purged by Biden’s Covid mandate, only 86 have been restored. Pentagon holdovers, led by DEI bureaucrat Stephanie Miller, are blocking Trump’s order.

The War Department has reinstated only 86 service members despite Trump’s January directive to restore all troops forced out under Biden’s Covid shot mandate. Officials blame Stephanie Miller, the DoW undersecretary controlling personnel systems, who designed and enforced the original mandate and previously served as the Pentagon’s DEI chief. Her husband’s work as a defense and pharmaceutical lobbyist adds further conflict concerns. Hegseth and senior Trump deputies have spent months fighting internal resistance to comply with the order.

Policy Obstruction in the Department of War🚨

Why do woke General Officers continue to get promoted while reinstatement of unlawfully discharged personnel continues to stagnate and go nowhere (despite President Trump’s EO to expedite their reinstatement)?

Meet Stephanie Miller, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of War for Military Personnel Policy for the Department of War and architect of the military’s previous Diversity and Inclusion program.

Stephanie is an SES who oversees the “full spectrum of human resource policies for over two million military personnel serving in the Department of War.”

Stephanie is in charge of accession policy, personnel management, General and Flag Officer promotions and retention, and more.

According to Stephanie’s bio, she served in “a variety of executive positions throughout the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel Policy,” to include leadership positions as the DoD Director of Diversity and Inclusion Management.

In addition to serving as a special assistant to SECDEF Ashton Carter, under whose tenure, in January of 2016, announced that “the Department of Defense opened all military roles to women, overriding a request by the Marine Corps to continue to exempt women from certain positions. In June 2016, Carter announced that transgender individuals would be allowed to join and openly serve in the military,” also served as Deputy Director for Navy Diversity and in a leadership position as the DOD Director of Diversity and Inclusion Management.

Stephanie served as a special assistant to SECDEF Chuck Hagel, who oversaw sequestration and in 2013 during a visit to Asian countries, stated his “main doubt was American staying power in the region. Hagel called the decline of American military power a “good thing”, because it forced American allies to share responsibilities. On July 31, 2013, Hagel announced the results of his Strategic Choices and Management Review, undertaken in response to the budget sequestration in 2013. One of the options he highlighted was to reduce the navy’s aircraft carrier groups down from 11 to as little as eight.

Under Stephanie’s leadership, military recruiting dropped to an all time low in the entire history of the all volunteer force from 2022-2024. Multiple branches failed to achieve recruiting numbers for the first time since the draft ended in 1973.

Stephanie has been an advisor to, and architect of, every decision in the military over the last decade and a half that has harmed military readiness and overall military strength.

As the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy, all accession and General Officer promotions run directly through her. You need not ask yourself why woke Flag Officers continue to accelarate through promotions, and personnel seeking reinstatement for unlawful discharges continue to run into red tape and road blocks. The answer is clear.

(Of note: I’ve include her previous bio and current bio. Her current bio is scrubbed of any mention of DEI.)


November 25, 2025 - GAO official admits GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: U.S. Government Accountability Office Director Admits GAO Staff “Stole & Backed Up” Vaccine Data Allegedly Deleted by RFK Jr.’s HHS – Possible Violations of Federal Records, Theft, & CFAA Laws.

Steven Putansu, a 16-year veteran of the U.S. Government Accountability Office & current Assistant Director, revealed a covert effort inside GAO to preserve vaccine research data.

Putansu admitted on hidden camera GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control – a potential violation of several federal statutes, including:

– Unauthorized Removal or Destruction of Public Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
– Theft or Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)
– Computer Fraud & Abuse Act – CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030) for accessing or copying government data without authorization.

“We’ve stolen & backed those things up so that someday they can come back to government.”

“I’d watch out for the vaccine denying HHS who’s going to ruin health care in this country even more than it already is.”

“It limits the amount of permanent damage… research he’s trying to delete is stored outside his control.”

Bro this is Deep State clownery on steroids, the kind of mask-off confession you normally only hear in a bad movie right before the villain gets dragged out of the building with a box of his desk junk. You’ve got a GAO director literally bragging on hidden camera that he and his little bureaucrat Avengers “stole” federal data, hid it off-site, and are running some rogue side-mission because they don’t like who the American people put in charge. That’s not “oversight,” that’s government fan fiction written by a guy who thinks he’s Jason Bourne but he’s really Dwight Schrute with a clearance badge.

This dude straight up lists federal crimes like he’s reading a grocery receipt, then says “If they ever find a way to get me, I’m done,” which is basically the guilty man national anthem. The arrogance is insane, the entitlement is radioactive, and the panic is delicious. Launch the investigation, put sunlight on every corner of this operation, and kick every rogue bureaucrat out of the cockpit. You can’t have unelected pencil pushers running secret data heists because they don’t like the new sheriff in town. This is the exact swamp infection America is sick of, and it just got caught dropping receipts on camera like a damn amateur.

Bro this is the kind of deep-state cockroach confession you only get when the cameras are hidden and the wine is flowing, and holy hell this dude delivered the whole damn script like he forgot he wasn’t talking to his therapist. The GAO literally admitting they stole federal data, hid it off-site, and are basically running a shadow government IT department because they don’t like who’s in charge at HHS. That ain’t “oversight,” that’s bureaucratic cartel behavior, straight up. These clowns think they’re the guardians of the universe, deciding which elected administration is allowed to govern and which policies get deleted or “protected.”

And the funniest part? He’s whining like, “we had to steal it to stop RFK Jr from ruining healthcare,” like bro, you just confessed to multiple felonies on camera while bragging about saving democracy like you’re Frodo carrying a USB stick to Mordor. This is the swamp exactly as Trump always described it, smug pencil-neck lifers who genuinely think they’re above the law and can override presidents. They don’t serve America, they serve themselves. These people shouldn’t just be fired, they should be audited so hard their hard drives confess too.