Email/Dossier/Govt Corruption Investigations

November 2, 2025 – Trump’s full interview on 60 Minutes and then the edited version

November 1, 2025 – Career intelligence officer confronts John Brennan about signing the “51 spies who lied” letter

(Credit: @amuse)

 

November 3, 2025 – Lindsey Halligan files public response to James Comey’s motion to dismiss his indictment; damning evidence in Exhibits provided


James Comey, from his burner gmail with his alias Reinhold Niebuhr, states:

to me No need. At this point it would shouting into the wind. Some day they will figure it out. And as Jack and Ben point out, my decision will be one a president elect Clinton… pic.twitter.com/8tdx74YoHo

— 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 (@mrddmia) November 3, 2025

(Credit: public meme)

James Comey is cooked. He tried to dismiss his indictment and prosecutors went nuclear and fully exposed his knowledge and involvement in the Russia collusion hoax.

Let’s break down this new damning evidence:

– FBI letterhead notes in his handwriting: “Hillary Rodham Clinton plan to tie Russia to Trump.” Plain as day. He knew, he ran it, then lied to Congress.
– Notes stuffed in a burn bag, hidden deep in a secret FBI vault, ready to torch before President Trump and Kash Patel arrived.
– Burner Gmail alias “Reinhold Neighbor” leaking classified dirt to the New York Times, illegal, denied under oath to Congress.
– Emails to FBI Special Government Employee Daniel Richman: “Well done, my friend. Who knew this would be so fun?” And: “President-elect Clinton will be very grateful.”

These filings eviscerate Comey’s defense. There is no doubt superseding indictments are locked and loaded.

He engineered the fraud, buried the evidence, and lied.

The cover-up always gets you. Comey’s done.

November 4, 2025 – Trump White House starts website that features illegal aliens who receive Medicaid benefits

President Donald Trump has launched a revolutionary new website designed to pull back the curtain on the massive scam of illegal immigrants sucking up billions in Medicaid benefits at the expense of hardworking U.S. taxpayers.

The website went live Monday night, publishing the names, mugshots, and criminal charges of illegal immigrants receiving benefits from the federal health program.

Some of those criminals were convicted of heinous offenses, including murder, rape, burglary, and assault.

According to the website:

The Trump administration has intensified enforcement against criminal illegal aliens receiving taxpayer-funded Medicaid benefits, arresting hundreds of unauthorized individuals since taking office, including those with serious criminal records who exploited taxpayer-funded Medicaid illegally or through loopholes. This crackdown, driven by executive orders prioritizing public safety and fiscal responsibility, has led to the swift deportation of many individuals convicted of heinous acts, ensuring that precious resources meant for American citizens are no longer diverted to subsidize violent criminals.

Compounding the crisis, Democrats have refused to pass a clean budget bill to end the shutdown unless Republicans concede to their demands for $1.5 trillion in new spending, including restorations to Medicaid expansions that would effectively extend coverage to over 1 million illegal aliens, funneling an additional $200 billion to such programs over the next decade at the expense of U.S. families. Below we’ve highlighted some of those criminals convicted of heinous crimes like murder, rape, burglary and assault.

You can visit the website HERE.

Below are some of the illegal immigrants posted on the website:

This explosive launch comes hot on the heels of yet another Democrat denial fest, where far-left politicians and their media mouthpieces insisted that no illegal aliens receive Medicaid benefits.

As Vice President J.D. Vance declared during a Fox News interview, Democrats “shut down the entire government because they want to give hundreds of billions of dollars of health care benefits to illegal aliens.” (Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/3/2025)  (Archive)

November 5, 2025 – The hidden transcript of Intelligence Community IG Michael Atkinson testimony is the key to reveal CIA targeting of Trump

In December of 2016, President Obama turned to Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan with a request to change the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) and blame the Russians for election interference in the prior presidential election. Brennan gave the task of assembling the fraudulent intel to a CIA analyst named Julia Gurganus.

Subsequently, inside the CIA the National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the Directorate of Analysis began working on a pretext that would create the impression for the misleading Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) as demanded by Obama, Clapper and Brennan; ultimately it was constructed by Julia Gurganus.

Inside the National Intelligence Council, one of the key figures who helped create the ICA fabrication was a CIA analyst named Eric Ciaramella.

You might remember the name Eric Ciaramella from the 2019 impeachment effort against President Trump.  However, in 2016 Eric Ciaramella was a CIA deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the CIA’s National Intelligence Council at the time the fraudulent Intelligence Community Assessment was created.

♦ The key point to remember here is that Eric Ciaramella was one of the fabricators of the fraudulent ICA; constructed late December 2016 and presented in January 2017 as part of the foundation for the Trump-Russia narrative.

Earlier this year, DNI Tulsi Gabbard began to drill down onto the issue of the fraudulent ICA and how it was constructed.  Current CIA analysts within the former National Intelligence Council (NIC) and CIA Directorate of Analysis began to notice Tulsi was going to declassify background documents, including the two-year House Intelligence Committee report revealing the fraud.  Tulsi Gabbard became a target.

Julia Gurganus (Credit: public domain)

Julia Gurganus was an active government employee at the time Tulsi Gabbard began making inquiries.  The CIA (NIC) changed the status of Julia Gurganus in June 2025 to that of a “covert” operative, in an effort to protect Gurganus.

The CIA changed the status of Julia Gurganus in June 2025, reclassifying her as ‘covert’, specifically because of the ODNI’s intent to reveal the fraud within the 2016 Russia election investigation.  This, the CIA thought, would forcibly stop DNI Gabbard from exposing Ms. Gurganus and taking action.  The 2025 CIA effort did not work.

In late July of this year, DNI Gabbard released the CIA intelligence information that was used in constructing the fraudulent ICA. On July 23rd, Tulsi Gabbard held a press conference alongside Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt and outlined the issues.

In August 2025, DNI Gabbard then declassified and released the CIA work product, and then later removed Julia Gurganus security clearance.

The CIA embeds at the NIC and directorate of analysis were furious, and subsequently leaked a false story to the Wall Street Journal saying DNI Gabbard had compromised a covert CIA operative working in government – a familiar ploy that had worked for them in the past.  However, this time it did not work, because her work history clearly showed Julia Gurganus was a known CIA employee.

Eric Ciaramella shakes hands with President Obama. (Credit: public domain)

♦ Key point:  Julia Gurganus and Eric Ciaramella both worked on behalf of CIA Director John Brennan to fabricate the fraudulent ICA in 2016. Gurganus was still a CIA employee in August of this year.

Back to Ciaramella…

In 2019 National Security Council (NSC) member Alexander Vindman also responsible for Ukraine, Russia Eurasia affairs, told CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella a fictional narrative about President Trump pressuring Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to provide dirt on Joe Biden in advance of the 2020 election.

Eric Ciaramella then became an “anonymous whistleblower” within the CIA to reveal the story and set up the predicate for the first Trump impeachment effort in late 2019.  You might remember the name, because during the impeachment effort anyone who mentioned Eric Ciaramella on social media had their information deleted, and they were blocked from their accounts.

Facebook, Google, META, Instagram, YouTube and Twitter all deleted any mention of Eric Ciaramella as the anonymous whistleblower, and banned any account that posted the name.  However, something else was always sketchy about this.

Michael Atkinson (Credit: public domain)

As the story was told, Ciaramella blew the whistle to Intelligence Community Inspector General, Michael Atkinson. It was further said that Atkinson “changed the CIA whistleblower rules” to permit an “anonymous” allegation; thereby protecting Eric Ciaramella.

Knowing, in hindsight, that CIA analyst Eric Ciaramella was one of the main people who constructed the 2016 fraudulent ICA, suddenly the motive to make him “anonymous” a few years later in 2019 for another stop-Trump effort makes sense.

Until today, the commonly accepted narrative was that ICIG Atkinson changed the CIA rules arbitrarily.  This is the main narrative as pushed by the media, allowed to permeate by the larger Intelligence Community, and supported by the willful blindness of a complicit Congress.

It never made sense how an IC Inspector General, especially one that involves review of CIA employees/operations, could make such a substantive change in rules for an agency that is opaque by design. There is just no way any IG can make that kind of decision about the CIA without the Director, the Deputy Director and CIA General Counsel being involved.

Someone in DNI or CIA leadership had to sign off on allowing ICIG Atkinson to change the rules and permit a complaint by Eric Ciaramella being turned into an “anonymous complaint.”

♦ Now, things are going to start getting a little dark here, because the implications are serious, and the aspect of ICIG Atkinson’s testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) being sealed is a little more than alarming when you consider what they were trying to do – impeach a sitting USA President on a fabricated issue.  Some context is needed.

Inspectors General do not operate in a vacuum.  They are authorized to conduct investigative oversight, as an outcome of permissions from the cabinet agency heads themselves.  The ICIG office, formerly headed by Michael Atkinson, falls under the authority of the Director of National Intelligence.

As the Inspector General of the Dept of Justice does not operate without the expressed permission of the U.S. Attorney General, so too is it required for the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community to have permission to operate in CIA functions with the expressed permission of the CIA Director.

To give you an example: You might remember when President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder created the Dept of Justice National Security Division (DOJ-NSD), they did not permit the DOJ Inspector General to have any oversight or review.

The 2009-2017 public reasoning was “national security interests,” as the DOJ-NSD was in charge of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISC) operations as well as Foreign Agent Registration Act (FARA) reviews and investigations.  The factual, evidence-based reason was the DOJ-NSD running political surveillance operations using FISA and FARA as weaponized targeting mechanisms to keep track of their political opposition, ie Lawfare. [But that’s another story]

In fact, in 2015 the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) for the DOJ, Michael Horowitz, requested oversight and it was Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates who responded with a lengthy 58-page legal explanation saying, essentially, ‘nope – not allowed.’ (PDF HERE) All of the DOJ is subject to oversight, except the NSD.

You see, the Department of Justice’s own Inspector General (Michael Horowitz who opened a January 2017 investigation into the 2016 politicization of the FBI and DOJ) was not allowed to investigate anything that happened within the NSD agency of the Department of Justice. See the ‘useful arrangement‘?  Yeah, Funny that.

It was not until 2018, when the OIG was tasked by then Attorney General Jeff Sessions and President Trump to look into the fraudulent FISA application used against Carter Page, when the OIG was finally given authority to review activity within the Dept of Justice National Security Division.

♦ The two key points here are: #1) ICIG Michael Atkinson does not make unilateral decisions to change the internal rules within the CIA, without the expressed permission of the CIA Director, CIA Deputy Director and CIA General Counsel. #2) The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) would also know of the changed rules and arrangement therein.

Vaughn Bishop (Credit: Wikipedia)

Courtney Simmons Elwood (Credit: Wikipedia)

At the time of the impeachment allegation and investigation by the House (Aug to Dec 18, 2019), the CIA Director was Gina Haspel (May 21, 2018, to January 20, 2021). The CIA Deputy Director was Vaughn Bishop, and the CIA General Counsel was Courtney Simmons Elwood.  In addition, the Acting DNI was Joseph Maguire.

We can reasonably be certain that CIA General Counsel Courtney Elwood and Acting DNI Joseph Maguire did not sign-off on changing the CIA rules permitting an anonymous whistleblower, because published media reports at the time outline both offices as NOT supporting the effort of ICIG Atkinson.

In fact, as the story is told (and investigatively affirmed) CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella was frustrated because he talked to CIA General Counsel Elwood about the leak from Alexander Vindman, and Elwood did not respond to his claims.

Instead, of following chain-of-command, CIA Analyst Ciaramella went to the House Intelligence Committee

Adam Schiff, and relayed the story as told to him by Vindman.  The 2019 conversation between Ciaramella, the CIA analyst who previously fabricated the fraudulent Russia ICA in 2017, and Adam Schiff who fraudulently pushed the Trump-Russia narrative in 2017, took place prior to the CIA whistleblower complaint being filed.

Now we get to the crux of the story.

♦ On October 4, 2019, ICIG Michael Atkinson gave closed-door testimony to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI) as part of their impeachment investigation.  One of the key questions to Atkinson surrounded the authority of his office changing the CIA whistleblower rules that permitted Eric Ciaramella to remain anonymous.

That Atkinson testimony was then “classified” and sealed under the auspices of “national security” by HPSCI Chairman Adam Schiff, the same guy who Ciaramella talked to before filing the complaint.

If congress, or more importantly the American public, had known CIA Analyst Eric Ciaramella was both the key author of the fraudulent 2016 ICA and the later 2019 CIA complaint, it’s doubtful any impeachment effort would have moved forward.

From within the CIA, Eric Ciaramella was the impeachment narrative creator and the Russian interference narrative creator.  In short, a political fabricator of intelligence within the CIA.

Again, ICIG Atkinson could not change the ‘whistleblower’ regulations on his own.  Someone had to sign-off on that, giving him the authority. Additionally, Atkinson a former legal counsel to the Deputy Asst Attorney General within the DOJ-NSD, is not going to go out on such a limb without a cya to protect himself.

The only person likely to give that authority within the structures and confines that operate inside our government was then CIA Director, Gina Haspel.  The Deputy CIA Director is not going to make that kind of a decision, especially given the circumstances, and the CIA General Counsel was not touching it.

That outline of events means the 2016/2017 CIA ‘stop-Trump’ operation under CIA Director John Brennan, was effectively continued by CIA Director Gina Haspel in 2019/2020.

[SIDENOTE: Now, does the 2020 CIA operation known as the “51 Intelligence Experts’ who denied the Hunter Biden laptop story take on context?  Now does the recent reaction, the angry outburst by former CIA Director John Brennan about the ICA construct take on some context?]

This is where doors slam and DC officials run out of the room.

This is where ‘pretending not to know‘ takes on another meaning entirely.

♦ IMPLICATIONS: CIA Director Gina Haspel had no way to know if the 2019 impeachment of President Trump was going to be successful.  Just as the ICIG needed a CYA to protect himself, so too would Director Haspel want a legal defense mechanism in case the entire fiasco blew up.  Enter the only oversight agency that can provide Haspel cover, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.

Underneath all of these machinations, there’s no other way for Director Haspel to protect herself other than to use the primary mechanism within the functions of IC oversight, inform the SSCI chair and vice-chair of her changed rule guidance to ICIG Atkinson.  That Occam’s Razor scenario puts SSCI chairman ¹Richard Burr and SSCI vice-chair Mark Warner in the silo-system loop.  If things blew up, Haspel could always defend herself by pointing to her informing the mechanism for CIA oversight, the SSCI.

• DNI Dan Coats resigned from office when the Trump impeachment effort was announced, August 2019.

• Acting DNI Joseph Maguire was appointed by President Trump to replace Dan Coats.

• Following the impeachment trial, President Donald Trump was acquitted by the Senate on February 5th, 2020.

• On Feb 20, 2020, President Trump replaced acting DNI Joseph Maguire with acting DNI Ric Grenell.

• On February 28, 2020, President Trump nominated John Ratcliffe to be DNI.

• Ratcliffe was confirmed May 26, 2020, and took office.

Before the impeachment effort began, Congressman John Ratcliffe was President Trump’s first choice to replace outgoing DNI Dan Coats in 2019. However, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said they would not confirm John Ratcliffe.  President Trump was forced to appoint “acting DNIs.”

Somehow, within an unexplained reversal, after the impeachment effort ended, the SSCI had a change of position and agreed to confirm John Ratcliffe.

As the fully confirmed DNI, in 2020 John Ratcliffe would have full control of the ICIG, including an understanding of what took place within the CIA that led to the change in protocol creating the “anonymous whistleblower” complaint: the impeachment origination.

As Chair of the SSCI in 2019, it is highly likely that CIA Director Gina Haspel informed Richard Burr of the change in protocol creating the “anonymous whistleblower” complaint: the impeachment origination.  ¹Richard Burr was replaced by Marco Rubio in May 2020.

John Ratcliffe is now CIA Director.  Marco Rubio is now National Security Advisor.

The transcript of ICIG Michael Atkinson’s testimony remains sealed.

The truth has no agenda.

We have one ally.

I’m doing all I can…

(Conservative Treehouse, 11/5/2025)  (Archive)

November 5, 2025 – Supreme Court Justices Grill Trump’s Tariff Authority in Oral Arguments

HERE WE GO!!!

🚨 Supreme Court Justices Grill Trump’s Tariff Authority in Oral Arguments

Given what I just heard and following this case, I believe The Supreme Court is LIKELY to UPHOLD the President’s authority to impose tariffs.

🔻 Breakdown:

– Justice Kavanaugh questions the “odd donut hole” in the statute: why the President can shut down all trade or impose quotas with every country but not a 1% tariff, arguing it lacks common sense.

– Benjamin Gutman argues tariffs are a fundamentally different power—akin to taxation for revenue—while the statute authorizes controlling or freezing trade, like embargoes, not revenue-raising measures.

– Gutman emphasizes context matters; no other federal statute uses “regulate” to authorize tariffs or taxes, and tariffs fall under commerce power, not taxation, citing historical figures like John Marshall and Joseph Story.

– Justice Barrett notes the interpretation allows embargoes on global trade but bars minor tariffs, probing if tariffs undermine the statute’s goal of controlling transactions during emergencies.

– Gutman clarifies embargoes ensure hard limits (e.g., no more than 1,000 units imported), while tariffs only add costs without guaranteeing control, potentially allowing trade to continue.

– Justice Jackson challenges why blocking all trade isn’t a bigger deal than a small tariff, and questions reliance on the Algonquin case, which was statutory interpretation, not constitutional.

– Gutman responds that Algonquin looked at text, context, and legislative history, suggesting Congress intended emergency powers for stopping trade, not revenue generation.

– Justices discuss framers’ concerns: revenue-raising powers were core to Article I, posing different risks than trade controls, and tariffs might create incentives misaligned with emergency goals.

🔻Overall Lean of SCOTUS Judges:

Remember, this is a bite sized morsel of the entire argument.

– Conservative Justices (e.g., Kavanaugh, possibly Alito based on related reports) appear more open to the administration’s interpretation, questioning the limitations on presidential tariff authority and expressing concern about removing it from the “suite of tools” for economic emergencies.

– Liberal Justices (e.g., Jackson, possibly others) seem to be probing the breadth of presidential power, potentially leaning towards a narrower interpretation that aligns with historical and constitutional concerns about revenue-raising authorities.

🔻 My Educated Guess on the Decision:

Given the current composition of the Supreme Court and the oral arguments, it is likely that the majority WILL SIDE with the administration, upholding the President’s authority to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).

The conservative majority, particularly Kavanaugh and possibly Alito, seem concerned about limiting presidential tools in economic emergencies, and the historical and contextual arguments presented by Gutman may resonate with them.

However, the end decision might be narrow, focusing on the specific statutory interpretation rather than broadly expanding presidential power, to garner a majority that includes some swing votes like Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Barrett.

🔻 When to Expect an Answer?

Given that oral arguments occurred on today, we can expect a decision sometime between late May and early July 2026, likely closer to June 2026, as is customary for major cases. May even be earlier given the importance.

I’m feeling very good about this. Don’t pay attention to the doom and gloomers. This is destiny!

Howard Lutnick: KABOOM 💥

President Trump will WIN the SCOTUS Tariff Case and the economy will go 🆙🆙🆙!

If by chance SCOUTS rules against him, “there’s something called section 232 which is also about tariffs, so there are plenty of tariff rules that the President has no matter what. The answer is, these judges are going to side with Donald Trump.”

**Section 232** refers to a provision in the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (specifically, 19 U.S.C. § 1862), which grants the U.S. President broad authority to impose tariffs, quotas, or other trade restrictions on imports deemed a threat to national security.

It empowers the President to act unilaterally if imports could impair U.S. national security, such as by weakening domestic industries critical to defense (e.g., steel or aluminum production). –

The Department of Commerce conducts an investigation (typically 270 days) to assess the impact of imports. If a threat is found, the President has 90 days to decide on remedies, which could include tariffs or negotiations with trading partners. –

Notably invoked during the Trump administration in 2018 for 25% tariffs on steel and 10% on aluminum imports from various countries, citing national security risks to U.S. manufacturing. Similar actions have occurred under other presidents, though less frequently. In the context of your quote, Section 232 underscores the expansive executive powers on trade policy—often bypassing Congress or courts—allowing a president like Trump to pursue tariffs even amid legal challenges, as it’s framed as a national security tool rather than pure economic policy.

November 5, 2025 – Jeffrey Epstein told cellmate that Maurene Comey offered freedom if he agreed to implicate Donald Trump

Maurene Comey, a former assistant NY US attorney prosecuted high profile cases including Epstein, Maxwell, Tartaglione, and Sean “P Diddy” Combs (Credit: Reuters)

Jeffrey Epstein claimed New York federal prosecutors told him he could walk free if he agreed to implicate Donald Trump, according to his ex-cellmate.

After his arrest on child sex-trafficking charges in July 2019, Epstein was transferred to the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan — where he shared a cell with ex-cop Nicholas Tartaglione, who was awaiting trial before being convicted on a quadruple-murder charge.

Tartaglione, 57, now claims that Epstein, who died a month after being arrested, told him prosecutors had offered to cut a deal if he’d snitch on President Trump, who was then in his first term.

“Prosecutors … told Epstein that if he said President Trump was involved with Esptein’s crimes he would walk free. in a petition to be pardoned,” Tartaglione claims in a pardon application filed in July and obtained by The Post.

“Epstein told me that [lead prosecutor] Maurene Comey said that he didn’t have to prove anything, as long as President Trump’s people could not disprove it. According to Maurene Comey, the FBI were ‘her people, not his [President Trump’s],’ ” the filing states.

(…) Tartaglione added in his petition that Epstein told him “President Trump was not involved in Epstein’s crimes.”
(Read more: NY Post, 11/5/2025)  (Archive)

November 6, 2025 – Trump holds closed-door meeting with Senate Republicans; tensions running high

President Donald Trump had heated words with GOP leadership, including South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, left. (Credit: Alex Wong / Getty Images; Samuel Corum / Getty Images)

Tensions are running high in the Republican Party following a special election Tuesday that did not go the way they had hoped.

In the aftermath, President Donald Trump sees one, clear-cut solution to these newfound GOP woes: Ending the filibuster.

And any Republican who wants to get in the way of that is now facing Trump’s unbridled ire.

According to Axios, Trump held an “eerily silent” and “uncomfortable” meeting with Republican senators Wednesday morning.

Trump reportedly laid into his party, noting that the GOP was losing the PR battle over the ongoing government shutdown.

The president also warned that Republicans would “get killed” and be viewed as “do-nothing Republicans” if they don’t end the filibuster (Senate rules currently call for 60 votes for most legislation).

“If you don’t terminate the filibuster, you’ll be in bad shape,” Trump told GOP senators during the public portion of this meeting.

According to Punchbowl News reporter Andrew Desiderio, things got more intense once reporters were asked to leave:

(Read more: Western Journal, 11/6/2025)  (Archive)

November 7, 2025 – Trump pardons Rudy Giuliani, others involved in bid to challenge 2020 election

President Trump pardons Rudy Giuliani on November 7, 2025. (Credit: video clipping)

President Donald Trump has pardoned a number of prominent figures involved in his effort to challenge the 2020 election outcome, according to U.S. Pardon Attorney Ed Martin on Nov. 9.

A proclamation document shared by Martin on social media named more than 70 individuals, including former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows, and attorneys Sidney Powell and John Eastman, all accused of involvement in Trump’s bid to challenge the 2020 election results.

The pardons apply to conduct tied to the individuals’ involvement in activities surrounding the 2020 presidential election, as well as any conduct related to “their efforts to expose voting fraud and vulnerabilities in the 2020 Presidential Election,” according to the document.

“This proclamation ends a grave national injustice perpetrated upon the American people following the 2020 Presidential Election and continues the process of national reconciliation,” the document states.

The pardon only covers federal charges brought against those listed. The proclamation also explicitly states that the pardon does not apply to Trump.

The proclamation was signed by the president on Nov. 7, according to the document.

In an emailed statement to The Epoch Times, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the individuals were targeted by the Biden administration “for challenging an election, which is the cornerstone of democracy.”

“Getting prosecuted for challenging results is something that happens in communist Venezuela, not the United States of America, and President Trump is putting an end to the Biden regime’s communist tactics once and for all,” Leavitt stated. (Read more: The Epoch Times, 11/10/2025)  (Archive)

November 7, 2025 – Grand jury subpoenas Brennan, Strzok, Page as part of federal Russiagate probe

A federal grand jury has subpoenaed former CIA Director John Brennan, former FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, among others as part of the Justice Department’s investigation into the origins of the Trump-Russia probe, Fox News Digital has learned.

Sources told Fox News Digital Brennan; Strzok, the FBI’s former deputy assistant director of counterintelligence; and Page, a former FBI lawyer, were served with federal subpoenas on Friday.

Law enforcement sources told Fox News Digital that up to 30 subpoenas will be issued in the coming days relating to the investigation.

The grand jury is out of the Southern District of Florida. U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida Jason Reding Quiñones is supervising the probe.

Fox News Digital first reported this summer that Brennan was under criminal investigation. (Read more: Fox News, 11/6/2025)  (Archive)

November 6, 2025 – Nancy Pelosi announces her retirement; how she got filthy rich while in Congress

Nancy Pelosi raps the gavel she used in the House of Representatives 14 years earlier when the Affordable Care Act was passed during a news conference to mark the anniversary at the U.S. Capitol on March 21, 2024 (Credit: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Democratic California Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s wealth grew by at least 2,292%, largely through stock trading, during her 37 years in Congress.

The former House speaker, who announced Thursday that she will retire from Congress in 2027, had a $2,675,036 minimum net worth in the year she began serving and a $63,996,050 minimum net worth in 2024, according to a Daily Caller News Foundation analysis of assets and liabilities listed in her congressional financial disclosures. An analysis by Quiver Quantitative estimates her current net worth more precisely at $278,760,000 million.

Pelosi’s maximum net worth in 2024 was an estimated $311,443,000, her filings show. Lawmakers did not report maximum dollar amounts in 1987, the year Pelosi served her first term.

The 85-year-old congresswoman’s portfolio nearly doubled the S&P 500’s growth in 2024, the DCNF previously reported. Her wealth prompted calls for reforming the rules on lawmakers trading stocks, as well as suspicion that she engaged in illegal insider trading based on advance knowledge about industry trends. Her office denied such claims, saying she does not personally own stocks or have prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in transactions. Her husband, Paul, manages her trades.

Pelosi’s office did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment. (Read more: Daily Caller, 11/7/2025)  (Archive)

November 7, 2025 – Congressman reveals FBI informants warned of armed violence, Antifa presence before January 6 “insurrection”

(Credit: Jag Reporter)

Numerous confidential informants alerted the FBI prior to the Jan. 6, 2021 riot that there was the strong possibility of “armed” conflict at the U.S. Capitol, but that intelligence was not disbursed aggressively enough to force a change in security that fateful day, the first congressman to review those source reports tells Just the News.

Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., the chairman of the House Judiciary subcommittee investigating Jan. 6 law enforcement failures, said he was floored to see the specificity of threats and the consistency in warnings that multiple confidential human sources provided the FBI and that the intelligence was serious enough that it should have prompted more security and possibly even a cancellation of President Donald Trump’s speech that day on the Ellipse.

Loudermilk said the intelligence reports came weeks and days in advance of the Capitol riot from about two dozen informants embedded in radical groups around the country and that many of those informants came to the Capitol to keep assisting the FBI.

“I was surprised that we found this significant intelligence that was derived from these people embedded in these organizations,” he said Friday night in an expansive interview on the “Just the News, No Noise” television show. “There is no way that at least the Washington Field Office or the FBI headquarters was not aware that there were elements, not the entire crowd. There were elements of people coming to Washington, DC with the intent of attacking the Capitol of the United States.”

The Georgia lawmaker credited current FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi for giving him access to the intelligence reports of the informants and said that it opened a whole new avenue of inquiry into whether some elements inside the FBI withheld intelligence that could have helped Capitol Police better prepare or repel the violence that occurred that day.

“We’re really having a hard time finding really any tangible reports that were sent to the Capitol Police or other agencies. And so my question is, what did they know? When did they know it, and what did they do with the information?” he said.

“I can tell you unequivocally, they had to know that there was something not only bad going to happen, but the reports coming from these confidential human sources, not just one, but multiple sources from multiple organizations across multiple field offices across the nation, were reporting the same thing,” he added.

Loudermilk said the informants made clear to their FBI handlers “that not only was there going to be violence in Washington, DC, at the Capitol on January 6, most of the reports were it was going to be a whole lot worse than what actually it turned out to be.”

Pressed further, Loudermilk said he was waiting to have documents further declassified but confirmed multiple informants told the FBI that groups were planning an armed attack on the Capitol, lawmakers or law enforcement during the certification of the 2020 election results that cleared the way for Joe Biden to become the 46th president.

(Read more: Just the News, 11/7/2025)  (Archive)

November 7, 2025 – Key details about how the systems of the intelligence apparatus were weaponized against Trump

Many people have asked for videos to outline key details about how the systems of the intelligence apparatus were weaponized against President Trump. Well, friend of the Treehouse John Spiropoulos is doing exactly that.

These video segments are not outlines of supposition, guesswork or possibility.  In true CTH mission focus, Spiropoulos makes his presentations full of fact-based citations for scrutiny and review.  Citations, timelines and verifiable receipts are how truthful information cuts through the AI silo filtration; the tech effort to control speech by controlling reach.

John is working hard to put much of the information from our research library into accurate video context.  This is 30 minutes of actionable information. There are both YouTube Links Here and Rumble links Here. WATCH:

(Conservative Treehouse, 11/7/2025)

November 9, 2025 – USAID’s Domestic Color Revolution Network

MAJOR BREAKING: International actors are involved in the State Department led color revolution 🚨🚨

This is not speculation; it’s straight from a recorded call.

Ex-USAID employees describe how, before January 20, they moved internal groups off government systems and into encrypted Signal chats, then quickly linked with foreign partners and NGOs after the inauguration. This attempt at creating a color revolution isn’t new news; this part was already reported in NOTUS earlier this year.

But what’s not reported is the international aspect. One participant explicitly frames it as “a global anti-authoritarian movement,” connecting U.S. officials with “colleagues from around the world who have dealt with this directly.”

They reference coordination with Johns Hopkins, “international democracy and conflict mitigation spaces,” and efforts to mobilize across borders against what they perceive as domestic authoritarianism.

At what point does this become treason?

As always, patience as I pull together this thread.

Mike Benz does a stunning deep dive into DataRepublican’s thread:

Censorship Industry Annotated 106 — The Bigger The Front, The Bigger The Back. In this subscriber stream, I went through DataRepublican’s viral thread and added context, color & details about USAID cells plotting to use domestically the Dept of Dirty Tricks tactics they were formerly trained & tasked to do abroad.

November 9, 2025 – The reason why Democrats are forcing a government shutdown

(Credit: public meme)

Many Americans are asking why Democrats forced another government shutdown. The truth is simple: it’s political theater.

After months of fading media attention and a struggling campaign season, Democrats needed a headline. The shutdown guarantees it.

But beneath the political noise lies a calculated strategy—one that hinges on expanding Medicaid coverage to illegal immigrants and weaponizing public sympathy for future elections.

The debate began when Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, a sweeping reform designed to close long-standing loopholes in federal spending. One of the most consequential provisions stopped states from passing Medicaid costs for illegal immigrants onto federal taxpayers.

The law required states to cover these costs themselves, eliminating a system that blurred eligibility lines and wasted billions of dollars each year.

Democrats want that provision repealed. Their refusal to pass a funding bill without restoring those payments is what triggered the shutdown.

Behind the rhetoric about “healthcare for all” is an effort to restore a hidden subsidy—one that forces law-abiding Americans to finance benefits for those who entered the country illegally.

California provides a striking example of how this system was abused.

In 2023, the state budgeted $3.9 billion in Medicaid spending for illegal immigrants. Because the federal government reimburses roughly 70% of state Medicaid expenses, most of that cost fell not on Californians, but on taxpayers from other states.

To inflate reimbursement further, California raised hospital and nursing-home taxes, recycled the funds back through Medicaid, and claimed it as new spending.

The maneuver created the illusion of a budget increase to qualify for more federal aid—a financial shell game that allowed the state to spend little of its own money while draining federal resources.

New York and Illinois soon followed. In 2024, New York allocated $2.4 billion to expand full Medicaid benefits to illegal immigrants under 65, while Illinois extended coverage to noncitizens over 42.

The pattern is identical across each blue state: raise spending artificially, capture more federal dollars, and redirect those funds to individuals who are not legally eligible for the program.

The result is a program riddled with inefficiency and corruption.

(…) Medicaid now consumes more than $800 billion annually, accounting for over 15% of all federal spending.

(Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/9/2025)  (Archive)

November 10, 2025 – Two junior prosecutors in Southern District of Florida abruptly resign in protest of Russiagate probe

(…) Two junior prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida who were asked to participate in the Russiagate probe have resigned, according to MSNBC.

US Attorney Jason Reding Quiñones called a unit-wide meeting after two junior Assistant US Attorneys resigned.

According to MSNBC, one of the prosecutors resigned because they “felt like there was something they could not take part in because it would violate their ethical responsibilities.”

(Timeline editor’s note: Lately, when I embed a tweet, an accompanying video does not appear. You must go to the tweet to see it.)

November 10, 2025 – BBC scandal unfolds: Executives resign amid deceptive Trump edit and USAID-funded censorship network targeting Americans exposed

Director-General of the BBC, Tim Davie, resigns November 10, 2025. (Credit: public domain)

On November 10, 2025, the BBC found itself at the center of an international scandal when President Trump threatened to sue the broadcaster for $1 billion over what his lawyer called “malicious, disparaging” edits to a speech Trump delivered on January 6, 2021. The documentary, titled “Trump: A Second Chance?” and broadcast before the 2024 presidential election, manipulated Trump’s speech to create what the BBC itself later admitted gave “the impression of a direct call for violent action.”

Deborah Turness (Credit: public domain)

The deceptive editing was stark.The BBC version rearranged Trump’s words to say: “We’re going to walk down to the Capitol and I’ll be there with you and we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” This selective editing removed critical context where Trump explicitly called for peaceful protest, stating supporters would “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.”

The fallout was swift. Tim Davie, head of the BBC, and Deborah Turness, head of news, resigned on Sunday, November 9, 2025, after growing pressure over the manipulated documentary. Samir Shah, the BBC’s chair, issued a formal apology: “With hindsight, it would have been better to take more formal action. We accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologize for that error of judgment.”

(…)

The USAID Connection: Laundering Censorship Through “Development” Funds

In early 2025, a startling shake-up at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) drew attention to a global censorship network reaching into American discourse. As investigative journalist Mike Benz revealed on Newsmax, the Trump administration abruptly put most USAID staff on leave amid allegations that taxpayer funds were being “laundered” through media organizations to control narratives. On Friday, February 7, 2025, at 11:59 pm (EST), all USAID direct hire personnel were placed on administrative leave globally, except for a select group managing mission-critical functions.

At the center of this storm was the BBC. The broadcaster, via its development arm BBC Media Action, has received substantial USAID funding over multiple years. According to BBC Media Action’s own press release from February 4, 2025, USAID contributed approximately £0.9 million ($1.1 million) to BBC Media Action in the 2017-2018 financial year alone, as part of a broader financial relationship spanning several years. BBC Media Action’s 2023-2024 funding chart prominently lists USAID as contributing £2,613k (approximately $3.3 million), making it one of the organization’s top donors.

The arrangement effectively “laundered” U.S. taxpayer money into foreign censorship efforts. Instead of merely producing public-interest media, BBC Media Action has been accused of aligning with a broader campaign to silence independent voices under the guise of combating “misinformation.” As I noted in my previous report, “The way USAID has funneled taxpayer funds into BBC Media Action and the Trusted News Initiative, effectively laundering transatlantic influence operations to suppress U.S. citizens’ constitutional rights, demonstrates a clear violation of democratic principles.”

(Read more: Ji Sayer/Substack, 11/10/2025  (Archive)

November 10, 2025 – Taxpayer-Funded Jihad: How Florida’s voucher program is bankrolling an Islamic school founded by convicted terror supporters

Florida’s school-choice dollars are bankrolling the American Youth Academy – a rebranded network founded by operatives of Palestinian Islamic Jihad and sustained by Muslim Brotherhood heirs and sympathizers.

Nestled in the suburbs of Temple Terrace, Florida, the American Youth Academy (AYA) operates as a K-12 Islamic school serving around 1,165+ students. Its website promises “academic excellence in a safe, nurturing, and Islamic environment” to cultivate “successful 21st-century global citizens.”

But behind that polished façade lies one of Florida’s most alarming stories: AYA has a documented history with terrorist supporters – and even literal terrorists – that continues to this day.

The AYA’s origins lead directly back to the Islamic Academy of Florida (IAF), founded in 1992 by Sami Al-Arian and Mazen al-Najjar, both professors at the University of South Florida (USF).

Even more shocking, the late Ramadan Shalah – a leader of the U.S.-designated terrorist organization Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) – also taught at the IAF.

Yet this terror-tied school still benefits from Florida’s taxpayer-funded school-choice voucher system – a program designed to rescue children from failing public schools, not to bankroll Sharia-compliant institutions promoting militant and unconstitutional ideology right under our noses.

This report is brought to you as a part of RAIR’s series on taxpayer-funded Jihad in America’s schools.

(…)  After IAF was stripped of its lucrative taxpayer-funded vouchers, it was clear that the school had to rebrand. Despite the terror-tied founding of the Islamic Academy of Florida, it was allowed to continue as an Islamic school with a new name: “American Youth Academy”.

In October 2005, the Tampa Tribune reported:

“Board members admit that creating a new image can be confusing because the new school uses the same buildings, desks, books and equipment as the Islamic Academy. Nearly half the teachers and many students are the same.”

Magda Elkadi Saleh

The school also hired a new principal, Magda Elkadi Saleh, who worked at the school for over a decade before becoming principal at the Bayaan Academy in Tampa.

As reported at RAIR Foundation USA, not only has Saleh served as Vice President (USA) of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and as a member of both the Council of Islamic Schools in North America (CISNA) and the Islamic Schools League of America (ISLA), her late father, heart surgeon Ahmed Elkadi, was a pivotal member of the Muslim Brotherhood in America; and a founder of the Muslim American Society (MAS) as well as the Muslim Students Association (MSA) and others.

Ahmed Elkadi

Ahmed Elkadi, according to an article at the Chicago Tribune in September 2004, oversaw a group whose “ultimate goal, one so controversial that it is a key reason they have operated in secrecy: to create Muslim states overseas and, they hope, someday in America as well.”

The article specifically points out that “the U.S. Brotherhood has had a significant and ongoing impact on Islam in America, helping establish mosques, Islamic schools, summer youth camps and prominent Muslim organizations.”

With this in mind, consider that the Tampa Tribune article emphasized that the American Youth Academy has “ambitious plans: [to build] a 73,000-square-foot concrete and steel building on the property, which is next to a mosque, a focal point for the growing Muslim community.”

Shaker El-Sayed

Ahmed Elkadi was a “longtime friend” of Shaker El-Sayed, former Secretary General of the Muslim American Society and Imam of the Dar-Al-Hijra Islamic Center in Virginia. El-Sayed criticized the case against Sami Al-Arian as “a war on Muslim institutions.” Shaker El-Sayed dismissed convictions in the so-called “Virginia Jihad” network as proof that “Muslims should not expect justice”. El-Sayed resigned as imam after an uproar over comments where he advocated female genital mutilation to curb women’s “hypersexuality.”

But Magda Elkadi Saleh’s connection to the Muslim Brotherhood does not end with her father. Her maternal grandfather was Mahmoud Abu-Saud, an economist and early Muslim Brotherhood leader “who had been repeatedly jailed in connection with his Brotherhood activities”. Abu-Saud was active in Muslim organizations and was a co-founder of the now-defunct American Muslim Council along with the notorious Abdul Rahman al-Amoudi, who was sentenced in 2004 to 23 years for terrorism financing and plotting to assassinate Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah.

As reported at RAIR, Magda Elkadi Saleh strongly promotes using taxpayer money to fund students. “In a society that is becoming increasingly diverse, choice allows families to pursue their values without imposing them on others,” she wrote in an OpEd she penned with Rabbie Moshe Matz in September 2023.

In a video from June 2025, Saleh declared that there is a “huge demand for Islamic education” in Tampa.

Recent Times to Present Day

In 2022, researcher and Front Page News columnist Joe Kaufman observed: “Given American Youth Academy’s radical history, it is amazing that it continues to exist and with impunity.”

Basem Ali

Kaufman posted a video featuring AYA Board Chairman Basem Ali referring to the founders of the school as “visionary leaders”. “Back in 1992,” he said during a 2022 AYA fundraiser, “a group of young, energized leaders in the community decided that they want to open an Islamic school in Tampa.”

He explained that the “visionaries” solicited funds from Nigeria-born Houston Rockets basketball player Hakeem Olajuwon, who gave a check for $250,000., which was used to “start the new building.”

It is very revealing that Basem Ali spoke so openly about terror-connected leaders at the fundraiser. Did the people in the audience find it strange that he was praising literal terrorist supporters, and even a terrorist leader? If so, they kept their opinions to themselves. Were Basem Ali’s fellow Board of Trustees offended that he was so openly praising the men who brought shame to the school for many years?

The answer is clearly no. Ali, the President and CEO of Giant Oil, Inc., is still on the Board of Trustees at AYA as part of the “Strategic Planning and Development Committee.”

Basem Ali, a Prolific Donor

Not surprisingly, Basem Ali is a prolific donor to militant left political candidates, particularly those with strong pro-Palestinian stances, channeling a total of $62,300 in contributions from 2010 to 2024. His most substantial support has gone to Michigan Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib, totaling $22,100 across multiple donations, including $3,300 twice in early 2024 and $5,000 in 2020, underscoring his alignment with her vocal criticism of Israeli policies.

Basem has also poured $27,500 into Virginia State Senator Sam Rasoul’s campaigns, highlighted by two $10,000 gifts in March 2021 alone. Other notable recipients include $5,000 to Republican Congressman Gus Bilirakis in 2012 – his sole contribution to a GOP figure – $2,700 to Ammar Campa-Najjar in 2018, $2,000 to Ilhan Omar that same year, $1,500 to Keith Ellison across two donations, and $1,500 to Rush Darwish in 2020.

Hassan Shibly

Former CAIR-Florida Executive Director Hassan Shibly, who was forced to resign in 2021 in the wake of abuse allegations from his ex-wife, has been a huge supporter of the American Youth Academy, where his children attended school.

Shibly has also supported Sami Al-Arian, along with his CAIR-Florida colleagues. In 2020, Al-Arian was featured in a CAIR Florida series “Exposed”, which featured Muslims who were allegedly wrongly persecuted in America. The series frames Sami Al Arian’s persecution as a deliberate, politically orchestrated effort to silence a prominent Muslim activist, rather than a legitimate criminal investigation.

The series also featured cause célèbres such as the “Holy Land Foundation Five”, convicted of funneling money to Hamas and “Lady al-Qaeda” Aafia Siddiqui, who was convicted of attempted murder after firing an M-4 rifle at U.S. personnel questioning her about documents containing instructions for terror activities. Also in the conviction are charges of planned “mass casualty” events within the United States.

In the episode, Shibly referred to the Al-Arian case as “a tremendous travesty of justice” and stated that Al-Arian and his family were “one of the first political victims of 9/11…whose rights were undermined, whose lives were devastated for political reasons in complete contravention to the U.S. Constitution, to the principles of liberty and justice and equity.”

Yet despite his support for Sami Al-Arian, Hassan Shibly has been a mainstay at the American Youth Academy. If the school really wanted to distance themselves from the terrorist activities of their predecessors, why would they support Hassan Shibly?

In the video compiled by Kaufman, Shibly also addressed the 2022 fundraiser, where he praised the “founders” of the school:

“It’s a tremendous blessing from Allah, subhanahu wa ta’ala, that we are here today. The founders and the board members of this institution have paved the way for us to build such a powerful institution that will last, inshallah, for generations. And it is indeed a gift from Allah if He allows us to be written amongst those who are supporting this great institution.

In the following video, investigative journalist Tsvi Yehezkeli goes undercover to expose the Muslim Brotherhood’s operations in America – focusing on CAIR Florida and its leader, Hassan Shibly. This segment is part of his 2016–2017 series Under a False Identity, now translated and subtitled for RAIR’s audience. To watch the full five-part series, click here.

Noor Salhab

Noor Salhab is on the Board of Trustees at the American Youth Academy, specifically on the Finance Committee. He has a long-standing, deep relationship with Sami Al-Arian.

On July 8, 2008, Noor Salhab wrote a letter in support of Sami Al-Arian. He said in part:

While we have known Dr. Al-Arian since 1988, we got to know him and his family even better since 1995. I worked with him for many years, got to know him and his family on a personal basis. I have served with him on two boards: the board of the school which he founded in 1992 (The Islamic Academy of Florida) and the board of the mosque (Islamic Community of Tampa).

For a period, Noor Salhab was president of Masjid al-Qassam. From the Middle East Forum in 2012:

The mosque maintains a significant link to the Al-Arian era through its president, Noor Salhab. In the early 1990s, Salhab leased his home to Al-Arian as office space for a think-tank called the World and Islam Studies Enterprise, where Shallah was a director.

As noted previously, the World and Islam Studies Enterprise effectively shut down in the wake of Sami Al-Arian’s 2003 indictment on terrorism charges.

To gain further insight into his mentality, Noor Salhab was quoted by local media in 2012 trashing Israel in the wake of a military operation that involved Israeli airstrikes targeting Hamas and other militant infrastructure in response to rocket fire from Gaza, which had intensified in the weeks prior.

“Hamas did not start the current conflict, as Israel, the U.S. and western media insist,” Noor Salhab said during an anti-Israel protest, “In addition to the devastating and illegal Israeli economic blockade on Gaza, on November 4th Israel killed a Palestinian man near the Gaza border, a man reportedly to be ‘mentally unfit’ and unarmed. The killing of a 12-year old Palestinian boy who was simply playing soccer followed this unprovoked attack.”

Forever Expanding

The American Youth Academy is the living continuation of a terror-linked network, sanitized through rebranding and sustained by Florida’s taxpayer dollars.

Started from humble beginnings, the AYA is forever expanding:

Behind the rhetoric of “academic excellence” lies a legacy built by operatives of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad and nurtured by the Muslim Brotherhood’s American infrastructure. And while ordinary parents think they are funding opportunity and diversity, they are in fact financing indoctrination – the very ideology that despises the freedoms their tax dollars were meant to defend.

Florida’s 2023 voucher expansion was designed to empower families, not to embolden Jihadists. Yet under the banner of “choice,” the state is subsidizing the heirs of Islamic Jihad.

Until lawmakers act, the American Youth Academy will remain a case study in national blindness – a warning that when the West funds its enemies in the name of tolerance, it pays for its own undoing.

Noor Salhab

Noor Salhab is on the Board of Trustees at the American Youth Academy, specifically on the Finance Committee. He has a long-standing, deep relationship with Sami Al-Arian.

On July 8, 2008, Noor Salhab wrote a letter in support of Sami Al-Arian. He said in part:

While we have known Dr. Al-Arian since 1988, we got to know him and his family even better since 1995. I worked with him for many years, got to know him and his family on a personal basis. I have served with him on two boards: the board of the school which he founded in 1992 (The Islamic Academy of Florida) and the board of the mosque (Islamic Community of Tampa).

For a period, Noor Salhab was president of Masjid al-Qassam. From the Middle East Forum in 2012:

The mosque maintains a significant link to the Al-Arian era through its president, Noor Salhab. In the early 1990s, Salhab leased his home to Al-Arian as office space for a think-tank called the World and Islam Studies Enterprise, where Shallah was a director.

As noted previously, the World and Islam Studies Enterprise effectively shut down in the wake of Sami Al-Arian’s 2003 indictment on terrorism charges.

To gain further insight into his mentality, Noor Salhab was quoted by local media in 2012 trashing Israel in the wake of a military operation that involved Israeli airstrikes targeting Hamas and other militant infrastructure in response to rocket fire from Gaza, which had intensified in the weeks prior.

“Hamas did not start the current conflict, as Israel, the U.S. and western media insist,” Noor Salhab said during an anti-Israel protest, “In addition to the devastating and illegal Israeli economic blockade on Gaza, on November 4th Israel killed a Palestinian man near the Gaza border, a man reportedly to be ‘mentally unfit’ and unarmed. The killing of a 12-year old Palestinian boy who was simply playing soccer followed this unprovoked attack.”

 

(Read more: Rair Foundation, 11/10/2025)  (Archive)

(RAIR Foundation USA (Rise • Align • Ignite • Reclaim) is a grassroots activist and investigative journalism organization made up of everyday Americans leading a movement to reclaim our Republic from the network of individuals and organizations waging war on our nation — on our Constitution, our borders, and our Judeo-Christian values.

RAIR is an integrated media platform amplifying the voices of the silent majority, while informing the citizenry of the daily assaults on freedom and fostering grassroots leaders and activists in order to combat the threats from Islamic supremacists, radical leftists and their allies.)

November 11, 2025 – Obama, Hillary and Soros are the architects of the coup against Trump and the American people

OBAMA, HILLARY, & SOROS are behind the weaponization of government and the architects of the coup against President Trump and the American people, and the DOJ has been let loose to hold them accountable.

There are many new people coming forward inside different agencies, new criminal investigations, subpoenas, and indictments being drawn up, and new grand juries established.

There is more going on in the background that they will never announce because it would directly play against themselves to do so.

This is the complete removal of all the corrupt bad actors and the ones who have infiltrated our own movement and government.

You are being shown the evidence of how the deep state and the media operates, controls through propaganda, and targets and attacks American citizens, even including a sitting president to uphold their lie and retain power and control over you.

Don’t buy everything at the surface level and don’t think they’ll tell you everything every step of the way. This is literally bigger than all of us.

cc: Maria Bartiromo, Ed Martin

(Timeline editor’s note: We are having trouble with embedding tweets and having their accompanying video open up in the timeline entry. Don’t know if it’s a WordPress issue or an X.com issue.)

November 11, 2025 – ‘Clinton Corruption Files’: Bondi, Patel releases new evidence about Clinton Foundation pay-to-play allegations and DOJ cover-up

Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel have produced to Congress a new cache of documents showing how Bill and Hillary Clinton’s foundation collected donations from foreign and domestic interests seeking influence – raising fresh concerns that such evidence was kept from federal prosecutors who tried to investigate pay-to-play allegations against the former first family a decade ago.

Officials told Just the News that the documents were transmitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in recent days and detail numerous instances of foreigners and even a U.S. defense contractor seeking to curry favor with the Clintons through donations to their family charity, including when Hillary Clinton served as secretary of State. Bill Clinton was a U.S. president from 1993 to 2001.

The officials said some of the evidence was flagged by whistleblowers who claimed such evidence was kept from a corruption investigation that was being conducted in 2015 by the Little Rock, Ark., U.S. attorney’s office before it was shut down by the Obama administration’s Justice Department.

The documents will make clear that there was an effort “to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Foundation by blocking real investigation by line-level FBI agents and DOJ field prosecutors and keeping them from following the money,” said one official directly familiar with the documents.

Officials said they have been gathering the evidence for weeks and have dubbed the documents the “Clinton corruption files.” (Read more: Just The News, 11/11/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 – New Epstein doc shows USVI Del. Stacey Plaskett received texts from Epstein while questioning Michael Cohen in 2019 congressional hearing

Stacey Plaskett, a Democrat who represents the US Virgin Islands in Congress as a non-voting delegate, received texts from convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing, the delegate’s office confirmed to CNN.

“During the hearing, Congresswoman Plaskett received texts from staff, constituents and the public at large offering advice, support and in some cases partisan vitriol, including from Epstein,” Plaskett’s spokesperson, Angeline Jabbar, said in a statement to CNN. “As a former prosecutor she welcomes information that helps her get at the truth and took on the GOP that was trying to bury the truth. The congresswoman has previously made clear her long record combating sexual assault and human trafficking, her disgust over Epstein’s deviant behavior and her support for his victims.”

The texts, first reported by the Washington Post, were released Wednesday as part of roughly 20,000 pages of documents made public by the House Oversight Committee.

The released text messages redact the name of the person Epstein was texting with on February 27, 2019 — the day former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen testified to the House Oversight Committee about the president’s conflicts of interests, business practices and payments to Trump’s alleged mistresses to silence their stories before the 2016 elections.

The Washington Post analyzed the text messages and compared them to footage of the hearing to report Plaskett was texting Epstein.

At the time, Epstein had already been convicted of two state prostitution charges, which he served 13 months for. A few months after the text exchange took place, he would be charged with sex trafficking minors.

Epstein had ties to the US territory because he maintained a home on Little St. James in the Virgin Islands, which he acquired in 1998, and purchased nearby Great St. James in 2016, according to a lawsuit filed in 2020.

According to the Post, Epstein seemed to have been watching the hearing and his texts to Plaskett appeared to influence what the delegate asked Cohen.

Rhona Graff (Credit: Astrid Stawiarz/Getty Images)

The Post reported that in one exchange, Epstein texted Plaskett: “Cohen brought up RONA – keeper of the secrets,” referring to — and misspelling the first name of — Rhona Graff, a longtime Trump assistant.

Plaskett responded: “RONA??” She added at 2:25 p.m, “Quick I’m up next is that an acronym,” suggesting that she would be questioning Cohen soon.

Epstein responded: “Thats his assistant.”

At 2:28 p.m., Plaskett began questioning Cohen and asked about Graff, along with other Trump associates he had mentioned, according to the Post.

In another text, Epstein told Plaskett “Good work” at 2:34 p.m. — a minute after Plaskett wrapped up her questioning, the Post reported.

The trove of documents released earlier this week show that Epstein mentioned President Donald Trump multiple times in private emails. The release came amid renewed pressure on Congress and the Trump administration to release more documents related to Epstein.

The House is expected to vote on a bill next week compelling the release of all of the Justice Department’s Epstein case files.

Meanwhile, Trump directed the Justice Department on Friday to investigate Epstein’s ties to a slew of high-profile figures, including former President Bill Clinton. (CNN, 11/14/2025)  (Archive)

“…Democrat Congressional U.S. Virgin Islands Delegate Stacey “Little Miss Impeachment” Plaskett did the dirty with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and Epstein’s attorney Darren Indyke for campaign contributions AFTER Epstein was convicted on child prostitution charges in 2008. Plaskett went to Epstein’s mansion to beg for campaign contributions. Now, Plaskett remains the sole defendant in a civil lawsuit brought by Epstein’s sex trafficking victims against the government of the U.S. Virgin Islands.

In the ongoing Federal civil lawsuit against Plaskett, Southern District of New York Judge Judge Arun Subramanian declared in his findings for allowing the case to proceed against Plaskett:

“In Plaskett’s case, the money she solicited from Epstein in New York and eventually received is directly related to the alleged quid pro quo to facilitate Epstein’s sex-trafficking enterprise,” so long-arm jurisdiction is established “at this stage,” the judge wrote.

While she does not live or work in New York, Plaskett has a home in Washington, D.C. and would not need to travel directly from the USVI, the judge said. Moreover, she is mentioned by name 60 times in the complaint and the plaintiffs assert that she engaged in unique conduct (like traveling to New York to solicit donations) that other defendants did not, he said.

The second amended complaint, or SAC, “alleges that Plaskett received a position at a law firm affiliated with Epstein’s lawyer, Kellerhals, Ferguson, and Kroblin, that Epstein made the maximum contributions to her campaigns, that Epstein hosted a fundraiser for her, and that Epstein gave her a $30,000 loan,” he said.

In exchange, the complaint alleges that Plaskett approved over $300 million in tax breaks for Epstein’s companies when she was counsel for the V.I. Economic Development Commission — a benefit she has repeatedly denied having any role in deciding — and used her political influence as a congresswoman to ensure that Epstein’s clients, co-conspirators, and co-defendants travelled freely and had access to victims and plaintiffs. She also allegedly “agreed to be Epstein’s ‘friend,’” and knew that her actions were in service of Epstein’s sex-trafficking scheme, it says.

November 12, 2025 – New Epstein email: Jeffrey Epstein sent his lawyer a “high importance” email about Pizzagate

Jeffrey Epstein sent his lawyer an e-mail noted as “high importance” in late 2016 stating Hillary and Bill Clinton’s relationship with Epstein had “the greatest bearing on Pizzagate” referencing an article in the Guardian.

Read that again please!

Epstein considered Pizzagate “high importance” and e-mailed his lawyer about it.

Epstein & the Clinton’s ARE Pizzagate and it’s always been real! Even freaking Epstein knew that which is why he nor anyone has even sent me so much as a legal letter over my nonstop reporting on Pizzagate over the past 10 years.

TICK TOCK!

November 12, 2025 – Exposing the 50-year mortgage sham

In episode 5 of The Gateway Pundit’s DC Dive with TGP White House correspondent Jordan Conradson, we discuss President Trump’s suggestion that he will introduce a 50-year mortgage plan to make housing more affordable for first-time homebuyers.

The President likened his plan to President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 30-year mortgage policies in a Truth Social post over the weekend, creating a firestorm among his supporters:

As homeownership in America becomes increasingly unaffordable and out of reach for younger generations, is this really the right answer? Or is it just a mirage of short term affordability that will only exacerbate the problem and enslave young Americans to the banks?

Conradson lays out a compelling argument against the 50-year mortgage and why this is not the solution that will save the American dream for young Americans.

DISTRICT COPPER (CAXPF in the U.S., DCOP in Canada): Visit https://districtcoppercorp.com for more on their U.S. partnership and future prospects.

Joining us to discuss is Steve Abramowicz, host of the Heartland Journal podcast, founder of heartlandjournal.com, and a veteran in the finance industry.

Abramowicz gives his expertise on how to handle buying a home and how home prices are really going to go down without leaving people indebted for life.

Later, we dive into Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against Harris County, Texas for using taxpayer funds to provide legal advice and representation to illegal aliens facing deportation.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, Paxton filed the lawsuit on Monday, arguing that Harris County’s allocation of funds to nonprofit groups to help illegals evade deportation is not only a violation of Texas’s Constitution but also federal law.

We also highlight Texas’s Colony Ridge, a 33,000-acre development near Houston believed to be the largest illegal alien settlement in the US, and how this ties into the homeownership crisis in America.

(Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025) (Archive)

November 12, 2025 – Newsom’s former chief of staff is arrested for conspiracy to commit fraud, obstruction of justice, false statements, and tax crimes

Dana Williamson, former chief of staff to Gov. Gavin Newsom, center, left the courthouse Wednesday after being indicted on federal charges alleging her involvement in a scheme to steal campaign money from former federal Health Secretary Xavier Becerra. (Credit:Sophie Austin/Associated Press)

Political consultant Dana Williamson, 53, of Carmichael, was charged by a federal grand jury with conspiracy to commit bank and wire fraud, bank fraud, wire fraud, conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruct justice, subscribing to false tax returns, and making false statements, U.S. Attorney Eric Grant announced. The 23-count indictment was unsealed following Williamson’s arrest this morning.

“This is a crucial step in an ongoing political corruption investigation that began more than three years ago,” said U.S. Attorney Grant. “As it always has, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will continue to work tirelessly with our law enforcement partners to protect the people of California from political corruption.”

“Today’s charges are the result of three years of relentless investigative work, in partnership with IRS Criminal Investigation and the U.S. Attorney’s Office,” said FBI Sacramento Special Agent in Charge Sid Patel. “The FBI will remain vigilant in its efforts to uncover fraud and corruption, ensuring our government systems are held to the highest standards.”

“Disguising personal luxuries as business expenses—especially to claim improper tax deductions or to willfully file fraudulent tax returns is a serious criminal offense with severe consequences,” said IRS Criminal Investigation (IRS-CI) Oakland Field Office Special Agent in Charge Linda Nguyen. “IRS-CI will pursue charges against those who deliberately exploit their business for personal enrichment.”

According to court documents, between February 2022 and September 2024, Williamson conspired with others to divert approximately $225,000 in funds from a dormant political campaign to an associate’s personal use. Collectively, they funneled the money through various business entities and disguised it as pay for what was, in reality, a no-show job.

The indictment also alleges that Williamson conspired with a business associate to create false, backdated contracts after receiving a civil subpoena in January 2024 from the U.S. Attorney’s Office regarding Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans made to Williamson’s business.

Williamson also subscribed to false tax returns claiming more than $1 million in business deductions for what were actually personal and nondeductible expenditures, such as private jet travel, luxury hotel stays, home furnishings, and designer handbags, as well as deductions for no-show jobs for friends and family.

When questioned by FBI agents in connection with ongoing investigations into the diversion of campaign funds, the backdated contracts, and allegations of public corruption, Williamson made false statements to the agents regarding each of those topics. (Read more: Department of Justice, 11/12/2025)  (Archive) (williamson_indictment.pdf)

November 12, 2025 – Newly released Epstein email to Michael Wolff alleges Hillary had sexual affair with ‘suicided’ Vince Foster

Hillary Clinton and Vince Foster (Credit: public domain)

In the latest twist from the trove of Jeffrey Epstein’s emails released by House Democrats, a 2016 message from the convicted pedophile to disgraced author Michael Wolff appears to allege that Hillary Clinton had a sexual affair with former White House Deputy Counsel Vince Foster.

The exchange began with Wolff asking Epstein for a “thumb nail” summary on “Nussbaum/foster,” prompting Epstein’s response implying an illicit affair between Hillary and Foster.

The email, dated May 25, 2016, cryptically states: “nussbaum white house counsel. . hillary doing naughties with vince.” This appears to reference Bernard Nussbaum, White House Counsel under President Bill Clinton, and Vince Foster, who died under suspicious circumstances in 1993.

Foster, a longtime Clinton ally from Arkansas, was found dead on July 20, 1993, in Fort Marcy Park, Virginia, with a gunshot wound to the head.

Official investigations, including those by the U.S. Park Police, independent counsels Robert Fiske and Ken Starr, and congressional probes, all concluded it was a suicide.

However, the circumstances, such as the lack of fingerprints on the gun, inconsistencies in witness statements, and the missing bullet, have fueled decades of conspiracy theories suggesting foul play by the Clintons.

The gunshot wound itself raises red flags.

Foster was shot once in the mouth with a .38-caliber revolver, the bullet exiting through the back of his head. For such a high-powered wound, experts say there should have been massive blood loss, skull fragments, and brain matter scattered around the body. Yet, reports describe minimal blood at the scene, just a small trickle from the mouth and nose, with no pooling under the head despite the body lying uphill.

Journalist Christopher Ruddy, in his book “The Strange Death of Vincent Foster,” calls this impossible, suggesting the body was moved from another location where the actual shooting occurred. (Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 – New Epstein email reveals author Michael Wolff urged Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail Trump

Michael Wolff and Jeffrey Epstein (Credit: public domain)

Discredited journalist Michael Wolff actively encouraged convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein to blackmail then-presidential candidate Donald Trump during the 2016 election cycle, according to newly released emails.

The explosive emails, part of a trove released by the House Oversight Committee on Wednesday, show Wolff plotting to use Epstein’s alleged ties to Trump as leverage to either derail his campaign or create a “debt” for personal gain.

Wolff, infamous for his error-riddled “Fire and Fury” book that painted a sensationalized and widely debunked portrait of Trump’s White House, emailed Epstein in December 2015, warning him about potential CNN questions on Trump’s relationship with the sex trafficker.

“I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you — either on air or in scrum afterwards,” Wolff wrote to Epstein.

The next day, he advised, “I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency. You can hang him in a way that potentially generates a positive benefit for you, or, if it really looks like he could win, you could save him, generating a debt.”

As Trump’s poll numbers surged, Wolff ramped up the pressure.

In January 2016, he told Epstein, “The more Trump looks real, or perish the thought, inevitable, the more reporters are going to focus on this, so, as you will not be surprised, you need a strategy.”

By February, after Epstein noted an increase in reporter interest, Wolff replied, “Yeah, you’re the Trump bullet.”

Wolff added that The New York Times had contacted him about Epstein and Trump, and the Hillary Clinton campaign was “digging deeply,” urging Epstein to “preempt” the story.

Just before the election, Wolff emailed with the subject “Now could be the time,” saying, “There’s an opportunity to come forward this week and talk about Trump in such a way that could garner you great sympathy and help finish him. Interested?”

(Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 – The Epstein emails that clear Trump, not implicate him

The latest batch of Epstein related emails released by congressional Democrats is being marketed as a revelation, yet the material reveals something quite different. What emerges is a portrait of Jeffrey Epstein as a man who feared Donald Trump because Trump understood what was happening long before Epstein’s public fall. This is not conjecture. Epstein himself admitted it in exchanges with the journalist Michael Wolff, whose role turns out to be much deeper than previously understood. Wolff was not simply profiling Epstein, he was working with him, thinking strategically about how to manage political narratives, calibrate public messaging, and use Trump as a kind of political instrument. This reframes the meaning of the disclosures. They do not implicate Trump. They exonerate him, and they shed light on the curious fact that figures like Bill Clinton and Bill Gates, who spent far more time with Epstein and enjoyed far more intimate access to his private world, never alerted authorities and in some cases actively insulated him. A puzzled reader may pause here. How can emails released by Trump’s political opponents help Trump? By considering the structure of the evidence. First, Epstein believed Trump knew about his criminal operations. Second, Epstein believed Trump went to authorities with his suspicions after expelling Epstein from Mar a Lago in 2004. Third, Epstein and Wolff repeatedly discuss Trump in a way that presupposes Trump’s distance from Epstein’s crimes. None of these points fit the narrative Democrats hoped to advance.

Consider what is already known. Epstein’s ban from Mar a Lago in 2004 has been public for years. Many have wondered what prompted it. Some attributed it to a dispute over real estate. Others suspected something more. The new emails point toward the second answer. Epstein writes to Wolff as a man who understands that Trump had sized him up, recognized something was seriously wrong, and taken meaningful steps to distance himself. The idea that Trump identified Epstein’s pattern of behavior before much of the elite social world did is not surprising. People with wide experience often recognize patterns others dismiss. One does not need to witness a crime to recognize the signs that a man is living a double life. The indicators accumulate, and eventually the picture becomes unavoidable. Trump saw the picture and acted. Clinton and Gates did not. To see the contrast, imagine two observers watching a piece of clay being shaped into a sculpture. The person who has worked with clay for years recognizes early signs of form and intention. The novice does not. Trump had spent decades around men who projected sophistication while hiding rot. Epstein fit the pattern and Trump observed it quickly.

The deeper puzzle concerns Wolff’s role. Reporters ask questions. Strategists craft narratives. The emails show Wolff doing the second, not the first. He advises Epstein on how to respond to CNN debate questions about Trump. He explains how to convert Trump’s denials into political capital, how to create what Wolff calls PR and political currency. He helps Epstein think about whether and when to go public as an anti Trump commentator to soften his own image. These are not journalistic functions. They are features of a relationship in which the journalist becomes a participant, offering guidance that could influence elections. This is why Byron York and others described Wolff as Epstein’s adviser and strategist. The term captures the distinctive character of the conversations. Wolff was acting as a kind of confidant, someone Epstein trusted enough to reveal fears, ambitions, and possible tactics.

A careful reader may wonder whether Wolff was simply pandering to a source. That would not explain the volume of communication or the candor embedded within it. Wolff conducted more than one hundred hours of interviews with Epstein. They traveled in overlapping social and financial circles. Epstein even joined an investment group assembled by Wolff to bid on New York Magazine in 2004. Such proximity is not inherently improper, but it creates risks. When the journalist becomes a friend, and when the friend begins advising on political maneuvers involving a future president, the boundaries blur. The emails show blurred boundaries everywhere. Epstein asks how Trump might answer a question in a debate. Wolff tells him to let Trump hang himself, then explains how to deploy the resulting contradiction. The discussion reads less like reporting and more like a planning session, one focused on how to transform Trump’s possible missteps into leverage.

Two further features of the email dump are striking. (Read more: AmuseOnX/Substack, 11/14/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 – Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy exposes California illegally issued 17,000 commercial driver’s licenses, gets them canceled

 U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean P. Duffy announced today that the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) has admitted to illegally issuing 17,000 non-domiciled Commercial Driver’s Licenses (CDLs) to dangerous foreign drivers. Thanks to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration’s (FMCSA) ongoing audit, each of these licenses is being revoked.

“After weeks of claiming they did nothing wrong, Gavin Newsom and California have been caught red-handed. Now that we’ve exposed their lies, 17,000 illegally issued trucking licenses are being revoked,” said U.S. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy. “This is just the tip of the iceberg. My team will continue to force California to prove they have removed every illegal immigrant from behind the wheel of semitrucks and school buses.”

Notices have been issued to the 17,000 non-domiciled CDL holders that their license no longer meets federal requirements and will expire in 60 days. FMCSA requires California to provide its full audit of all its non-domiciled CDLs so the agency can verify that every illegally issued license has been revoked and that the failures that allowed these licenses to be issued are corrected.

Reminder:

FMCSA’s nationwide non-domiciled CDL audit uncovered systemic policy, procedural, and programming errors in California’s non-domiciled CDL program which allowed thousands of CDLs to be illegally issued to foreign drivers. The audit also found that more than one in four of the non-domiciled CDL records sampled in California failed to comply with federal regulations. This includes issuing licenses that extended well beyond a foreigner’s work permit.

Other FMSCA actions against California:

In October, the Department announced it is withholding over $40 million from California following an investigation that found the state has failed to comply with the Department’s English Language Proficiency (ELP) standards.

The Department first threatened to withhold funds from California in August if they failed to adopt and enforce ELP requirements for commercial motor vehicle drivers. In July, California Highway Patrol has publicly stated it had no intention of following this important federal regulation.

In May, Secretary Duffy signed an order announcing new guidelines to strengthen English language enforcement for commercial truck operators. Under the new guidance, commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers who fail to comply with FMCSA longstanding English-language proficiency (ELP) requirements will be placed out-of-service.

(Department of Transportation, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 12, 2025 – Christina Bobb exposes names of Democrats behind alleged $200K payments for prosecution of GOP electors

Christina Bobb (Credit: public domain)

Arizona was still recovering from a bloody election war in 2020 over the hotly contested presidential race between President Trump and Joe Biden, and the race between Republican Kari Lake and Democrat (then-acting Secretary of State) Katie Hobbs for governor, when Arizonans were faced with yet another highly implausible result in the 2022 election between Democrat Chris Mayes and very popular Republican candidate Abraham Hamadeh. After almost two months and a recount, the race for Arizona attorney general was called for Democrat Chris Mayes by a mere 280 votes.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes (Credit: public domain)

As one of her first official acts as Arizona’s new attorney general, Chris Mayes, in April 2024, committed what many believed was a coordinated act of lawfare with attorneys general and prosecutors in several swing states against the eleven 2020 Republican electors and seven Trump lawyers, charging them with 9 felonies each.

In addition to Arizona, 3 other states filed criminal charges against the Republican electors who filed an alternate slate of electoral votes for President Trump in the event the election results in their states were overturned:

Georgia (Fulton County) — Fulton County DA Fani Willis’s investigation led to a sweeping indictment (Aug. 2023 grand jury) that included the Georgia GOP electors and allied lawyers, who were charged with several felony counts, including racketeering, conspiracy, making false statements, filing false documents, and impersonating a public officer.

Michigan — Michigan radical activist Democrat Attorney General Dana Nessel charged 16 Republican electors in July 2023, with 8 felonies each, including forgery and conspiracy. The laughable case was recently dismissed by a judge appointed by Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer.

Michigan’s activist (and not-so-bright) Attorney General Dana Nessel had a hand in destroying her own lawfare case against the 16 GOP alternate electors when she appeared on a far-left Zoom call admitting that the Electors truly believe Trump won, which belies her case that they falsely claimed Trump won the 2020 election. Michigan’s partisan hack attorney general then proceeded to brag about the hand-selected venue where electors would possibly face a far-left jury pool who would likely convict them.

Nevada — Nevada authorities brought charges against six Nevada fake electors (indicted in late 2023/charges refiled in 2024), including counts such as offering a false instrument for filing and uttering a forged instrument; the Nevada AG re-filed actions in December 2024 after earlier procedural setbacks.

Several other states had “alternate” or “contingent” slates (Pennsylvania, New Mexico, and Wisconsin), but none of those states has resulted in criminal charges. In New Mexico, prosecutors concluded that the wording on the certificates or state law meant prosecution wasn’t feasible without legislative change, and in others, prosecutors were investigating but chose not to pursue lawfare against their political enemies.

Yesterday, Christina Bobb filed a bombshell whistleblower complaint that will likely blow up the lawfare cases in Arizona and possibly every other state where electors were GOP electors and lawyers were falsely accused and/or charged by heartless Democrat thugs with crimes they never committed.

In her whistleblower complaint, the brilliant and fearless Christina Bobb, who is a former investigative journalist, author, Trump lawyer from 2022-2024, and a defendant in the Arizona lawfare case, claims that she has discovered she and her co-defendants (in State of Arizona v. Kelli Ward) had serious constitutional issues: the court found prosecutors infringed rights and that the case had “motivations other than criminal justice”.

Bobb claims in her statement that there is organized bribery in Arizona (and possibly other states), stating that the Democratic Attorneys General Association (DAGA) paid $200,000 to Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes in exchange for giving prosecutorial influence to States United Democracy Center.

The States United Democracy Center was founded in 2020 by one of America’s dirtiest Democrats, former Obama “Ethics Czar, Norm Eisen.

According to Christina Bobb’s claim, it appears that AG Mayes followed a prosecutorial blueprint provided by a group led by Norm Eisen and another one of the Democrat Party’s dirtiest players, lawyer and founder of the Democracy Docket, Marc Elias.

Through an inadvertent disclosure in the discovery she was receiving, Bobb uncovered that Mayes’ campaign received $200,000 from a group with a different name that happens to share the same address, president, executive director, and leadership team as the Elias and Eisen group. The money came after the election, implying that Mayes may have been paid to prosecute Trump supporters.

From the whistleblower complaint:

There appears to be organized bribery in the state of Arizona, and likely extending to other states. In the course of my criminal prosecution, the State of Arizona inadvertently disclosed information to the defense, which they have since acknowledged as authentic. Upon closer inspection, the Arizona Attorney General received $200,000 (what appears to be) in exchange for the Democratic Attorney General’s Association to have prosecutorial influence – through one of their initiatives, “States United Democracy Center” – in prosecuting their political opponents. To be clear, the Democratic Attorney General’s Association paid Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes $200,000, and she gave States United prosecution power to prosecute Trump attorneys, allies, and electors. Prosecutors claim on the record and in emails that States United represents their office.

The complaint explains: (Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/12/2025)  (Archive)

November 13, 2025 – Tucker Carlson announces he is releasing evidence tomorrow proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler by Thomas Crooks

BREAKING: Tucker Carlson announces he is releasing evidence tomorrow proving the FBI is lying about the assassination attempt on Donald Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania by Thomas Crooks

Joe Rogan and Elon Musk pointed out the INSANE inconsistencies

– The assassins house was PROFESSIONALLY scrubbed
– His home was scrubbed so well there wasn’t even silverware left in the home
– No footprint on the internet
– No social media footprint (completely wiped)
– He was in a BlackRock commercial
– Joe Rogan says some individuals inside BlackRock may have “recognized that it’s beneficial to them if he gets assassinated”
– There was never a formal report
– There was never press conferences where they detailed all the information they know currently and where the investigation stands at the moment
– He was a very young g kid there with a rangefinder (used to measure distances, very suspicious)
– CNN streamed it live, which Joe Rogan does not believe they did for any other rally. And certainly not for a rally that’s in the middle of nowhere in Pennsylvania
– They wouldn’t let people be on that roof because the Secret service lady said it was sloped and it was dangerous
– The snipers that were on the other roof was a, a steeper pitch (It made no f*cking sense)
– Random people saw him and pointed him out on the roof with a gun for a long time before it happened
– The kid had 5 phones
– His body was immediately cremated
– There was some indications that there was a phone that had been traveling from outside the FBI offices in D.C to where this kid lived multiple times

We need answers.

November 13, 2025 – AZ governor Katie Hobbs under investigation after new “pay-to-play” evidence emerges inside DCS

President Pro Tempore T.J. Shope (Credit: AZSenateRepublicans)

President Pro Tem T.J. Shope is calling for immediate updates from state and county prosecutors after newly surfaced internal messages, financial documents, and firsthand accounts indicate political pressure inside the Department of Child Safety (DCS). The matter surrounds a controversial 30% rate hike given to the group home provider Sunshine Residential Homes – a major donor to Governor Katie Hobbs and Democratic political organizations.

The documents reveal DCS staff themselves raised an alarm about Sunshine Residential’s political influence. Internal agency messages referenced the provider’s close relationship with Hobbs. Employees also described the situation as placing state leadership in an “uncomfortable position” because of the company’s political spending.

“These revelations are deeply disturbing,” said President Pro Tem Shope. “When senior agency officials feel pressured because a provider has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to the Governor, and that provider then threatens to pull critical beds unless it gets a massive rate increase, the integrity of government decision-making is called into question. This demands immediate answers.”

Concerns raised include:

  • Sunshine Residential demanded a sharp rate increase or it would shift its services to the federal system.
  • DCS leadership approved the increase despite warnings it would worsen an already projected $13 million shortfall.
  • Sunshine Residential claimed a large deficit to justify the hike, yet its financials show $440,000 in operating income.
  • Independent accounting experts noted the claimed deficit appeared inconsistent with actual financial performance.

President Pro Tem Shope’s letter – sent today to Attorney General Kris Mayes and Maricopa County Attorney Rachel Mitchell – requests confirmation that investigations into potential “pay-to-play” conduct remain active and asks for an update on their status.

“This is not a partisan issue – it’s a public trust issue,” said President Pro Tem Shope. “If political donations influenced decisions inside DCS, especially decisions involving vulnerable children, that is unacceptable. We intend to get to the bottom of this. Arizonans must be confident that their state government is not for sale.” (AZSenateRepublicans, 11/13/2025)  (Archive)

November 13, 2025 – Emails show Smith team tied to blocking Clinton campaign inquiry as DOJ builds grand conspiracy case

(Credit: Mark Reinstein/Shutterstock.com)

Justice Department officials tied to special counsel Jack Smith’s team have been linked to the blocking of an FBI inquiry into the Clinton campaign’s 2016 funding of the Steele Dossier, with this being just the latest revelation about Smith as the Trump Justice Department builds a grand conspiracy case alleging years of anti-Trump lawfare.

Emails released Thursday appear to show the officials shut down a potential FBI investigation tied to possible campaign finance violations carried out by Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign when it used cutouts to fund the opposition research firm Fusion GPS and British ex-spy Christopher Steele’s anti-Trump dossier. Two officials tied to Smith’s anti-Trump investigation were linked to the decision by the FBI not to pursue the alleged campaign finance wrongdoing by Clinton’s campaign.

The decision by the Trump DOJ and FBI to open a probe that treats the last decade of political weaponization of law enforcement and intelligence agencies as an ongoing criminal conspiracy will likely be aided by the wave of recently-released information obtained by congressional investigators.

J.P. Cooney (Credit: LinkedIn)

(…) Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias hired the opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which in turn hired Steele in 2016. Elias has testified he was aware of Fusion’s plans to have Steele brief reporters on his anti-Trump research during the 2016 contest, met with Steele during the 2016 contest and periodically briefed the campaign about the findings from Fusion and Steele.

Special Counsel John Durham said members of the Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS and Perkins Coie all played a coordinated role in pushing collusion claims and that Elias was part of the “joint venture” in 2016.

The FBI would pass on a criminal investigation into the campaign finance angle – and new records appear to show why.

Richard Pilger (Credit: public domain)

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, said Thursday that “the decision to decline the investigation” into the Clinton campaign and the DNC was made by Richard Pilger, then a leader in the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, and by J.P. Cooney, who was working at the time within the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

Grassley noted that Pilger “was later pivotal in reviewing and approving the opening of Smith’s Arctic Frost investigation” while Cooney “served as Smith’s Deputy Special Counsel for that investigation.” Pilger had previously been tied to Smith’s involvement with the Lerner saga years before. (Read more: Just the News, 11/13/2025)  (Archive)

November 14, 2025 – Tucker Carlson exposes Trump shooter’s ties to foreign terror group

Tucker Carlson‘s latest exposé is sending shockwaves through MAGA circles after the former Fox News host suggested that Trump’s failed assassin, Thomas Crooks, may be connected to a foreign terror group.

Carlson’s investigative team released a 34-minute video diving into the online history of Crooks, the 20-year-old would-be assassin who shot Donald Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania in July 2024. Crooks’ bullet came within less than an inch of penetrating Trump’s skull.

More than a year after the assassination attempt, the FBI has yet to release a clear motive for why Crooks tried to shoot Trump or whether he acted alone or in coordination with others.

Carlson’s uncovered YouTube comments allegedly posted by Crooks from 2019-2020, revealing the shooter’s long digital history of making calls for assassinations and political violence. Crooks’ YouTube comments indicate he radically shifted his ideology from pro-Trump towards the far left.

During the final phase in 2020 of Crook’s YouTube commenting, the shooter began interacting with a suspicious user ‘Willy Tepes’ who appeared to encourage Crooks to commit political violence.

He wrote to Crooks on August 4, 2020, ‘If a gun and a badge is all that is needed, then authority obviously comes from the barrel of a gun. We have more guns than they do ;)’

‘There is no way we can avoid a war at this point, so you just better get used to the idea,’ he added.

Carlson claims that Tepes’s name is listed on a foreign Antifa website connecting him to the Nordic Resistance Movement – a neo-Nazi group based in Scandinavia which has been designated a terrorist organization by the State Department.

‘The FBI hasn’t made any mention of him in public, although they certainly know he exists. Just days after the shooting, somebody screenshotted Tepes’ YouTube account page despite the fact that he has very few followers,’ Carlson said.

‘To the extent that he can be traced online now, you can find his username being used on a foreign Antifa website, those sites link him to the Nordic Resistance Movement … that’s all we know.’

Tepes wrote in another reply to Crooks about government efforts to seize guns from citizens.

‘The more guns that are out there, the less likely a gun confiscation will be possible. Nope, guns do not guarantee a victory anymore than jet fighters, tanks and drones do. It is the fighting spirit and brains that wins.’

‘We have nothing to lose and everything to win…..and the alternative, a global police state, is unacceptable. Nothing in life is simple but that is no argument against doing it :)’

Following Tepes’ online interactions with Crooks, the Trump shooter’s YouTube commenting ends.

Moreover, Crooks’ political views seemingly shifted dramatically towards left-wing ideology around early 2020.

In January 2020, Crooks reportedly attacked Trump for his ‘stupidity’ in one of his YouTube comments and mocked Trump supporters for sounding like a ‘cult.’

Crooks then reportedly called for anti-Trump supporters to conduct ‘terrorism-style attacks’ against the US government.

The future assassin outlined ways to ‘sneak a bomb’ into a government building and ‘set it off before anyone sees you,’ according to Carlson.

‘[In my opinion] the only way to fight the [government] is with terrorism style attacks, sneak a bomb into an essential building [and] set it off before anyone sees you, track down and important people/politicians/military leaders etc and try to assassinate them. Any sort of head to head fight is suicide and ambush/surprise attacks likely aren’t going to end well,’ Crooks allegedly wrote on YouTube.

MAGA influencers and lawmakers reacted with shock to Carlson’ latest reporting and demanded more transparency from Kash Patel’s FBI regarding Crooks.

Tennessee Republican Rep. Tim Burchett claimed that Crooks was groomed by the CIA via MKUltra-style mind control programs during an interview reacting to Carlson’s latest report.

‘They programmed this kid. You got a kid who’s got access to guns or has some simple knowledge of a firearm, he was programmed,’ Burchett told conservative influencer Benny Johnson. ‘The facts have been buried or burned or whoever knew is either sitting on a beach somewhere and, uh, enjoying a fruity drink or they’re dead.’

‘When the CIA says, ‘We don’t have this thing,’ and then their asses are brought into a court of law and they say, ‘Well, we have it, but we don’t use it anymore.’ Apparently, somebody’s using it.’

‘I’ve said that all along,’ Burchett added. ‘I’ve said that. Look at the history. Look at where we’re at in this country, the Deep State. It’s disgusting. Trump’s right. They’re not after, they’re not after him. They’re after us. He’s just standing in the way.’ (Read more: The Daily Mail, 11/14/2025)  (Archive)

November 15, 2025 – Prison staffers steal Ghislaine Maxwell’s attorney-client emails and funnels them to Jamie Raskin who then leaks to media

November 16, 2025 – January 6 Committee cost twice previous estimates, hiring TV producers to dramatize attack

The House committee investigating the January 6 “insurrection.” (Credit: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc./Getty Images)

The U.S. House select committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol cost almost twice as much as previously reported, including spending taxpayer funds for TV news producers and documentary filmmakers to create videos dramatizing its case against President Donald Trump, an investigation by The Center Square found.

The Washington Post reported that the panel had a projected budget of $9.3 million in September 2022. According to a review of U.S. House disbursements, the select committee spent $17.4 million.U.S. Rep. Troy Nehls, a Texas Republican who is on a new committee appointed by House Speaker Mike Johnson to investigate security failures on Jan. 6, said the original committee didn’t spend taxpayer money properly after The Center Square told him about the final costs of the panel’s investigation.

(…) Dan Savickas, president of policy and government affairs at the Taxpayers Protection Alliance, a non-partisan nonprofit, said more than doubling of the budget was not appropriate.

“The median budget for a House committee is $6 million a year, so for the Jan. 6 committee to spend $17.4 million is excessive,” he told The Center Square in an interview. “And anytime a committee is grandstanding, specifically Jan. 6, to fit a narrative instead of holding people accountable and getting the story is bad. That’s why they hired documentary filmmakers.”

Rep. Bennie Thompson, a Mississippi Democrat and chair of the committee, declined an interview request.“

The work of the committee speaks for itself, and the chairman continues to stand by it,” Yasmine Brown, a press secretary and communications director, wrote in an email to The Center Square.

An undetermined amount was spent on three dozen contractors and consultants. Many worked for a few months or less than a year, rather than all 18 months like full-time staff.

They are listed in the committee’s report but do not show up in a list of expenditures the U.S. House posted online disclosing its spending.Among them were the former president of ABC News, a longtime producer for ABC’s Nightline, an Emmy-award winning daily TV news producer, and a former documentarian for the Oprah Winfrey Network.

“I was part of the first ever team of former television journalists brought in by the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol to produce the historic live hearings laying out the committee’s evidence to the country,” Melinda Arons, a former Nightline senior producer, wrote on her LinkedIn page. (Read more: Just the News, 11/16/2025)  (Archive)

November 16, 2025 – Jack Smith may have handed Trump the golden key to pardon Tina Peters

Jack Smith may have provided President Trump with the legal avenue to pardon Tina Peters.

An analysis of the recent release of data from the Arctic Frost documentation, which includes Jack Smith’s list of conservatives he spied on, reveals some shocking information.  The House Judiciary Committee began releasing a list of individuals whom Jack Smith and the Biden Administration illegally spied on.  One significant finding has emerged.

A smoking gun has surfaced in favor of President Trump’s legal avenue to pardon Colorado’s Tina Peters.

The Arctic Frost Document, an inventory of Americans spied on by Jack Smith, features a unique entry on page 101.  It is believed that this entry refers to Tina Peters.  In the list of those illegally spied on, there is a line that lists Mike Lindell, and it includes a reference to “Mesa County”.

Mike Lindell was involved with Tina Peters for some time.  He invited Tina to his first symposium in South Dakota.  That was the first time we heard of Tina, a county clerk from Mesa County, Colorado, in charge of elections.  She shared at Mike’s symposium in South Dakota that she had identified altered results in her election systems after a recent election.  This was shocking news and the highlight of that first symposium.  There are countless articles linking Mike Lindell to Tina Peters and the election fraud she discovered IN Mesa County.

Tina Peters was later indicted in a Colorado state court and indicted on bogus charges and put away for 9 years.  President Trump is unable to pardon her because he lacks the authority to pardon a state crime.  No President to date has pardoned someone for a state crime.  However, if her case in Colorado was managed or significantly impacted by individuals who were part of the federal government, then some believe that President Trump could pardon Tina.

Before today, there was ample evidence that the federal government under Biden was involved in the Tina Peters case. There is an argument that if the federal government led the effort, directed it, or was a significant part of the effort to indict and imprison Tina Peters, it would give President Trump the ability to pardon her.

The Biden Regime’s involvement in Tina Peters Case

The FBI issued a statement almost immediately after Peters came forward, stating that they would investigate her for potential violations of federal laws. The Biden regime never formally prosecuted Tina, but it appears that Biden’s Department of Justice was working closely with local Colorado officials who sought to put Peters in jail. (https://coloradosun.com/2021/08/17/tina-peters-replaced/)

The Mesa County District Attorney, Dan Rubinstein, included Matthew Kirsh, the United States Attorney for Colorado in a May 17, 2022, email to multiple District Attorneys across Colorado. The email is titled “Rule 3.8 Meeting” which appears to reference the rules of professional conduct for prosecutors. (Justice.gov)

Email from Dan Rubinstein to DOJ attorney and Colorado District Attorneys, apparently brainstorming how to appear legitimate and ethical while prosecuting Tina Peters.

Daniel Rubenstein (Credit: Mesa County DA Office)

Matthew Kirsch (Credit: Justice.gov)

The email suggests that Rubinstein was having some trouble reconciling the prosecution of Tina Peters with prosecutors’ rules of professional conduct and had to call in the cavalry to help him brainstorm ways to avoid being “accused of wrongdoing.”

First, Rubinstein appears to recognize that there is no precedent for the prosecution he wants to undertake, as he expresses a desire that this group of legal minds start writing opinions and issuing guidance documents in the vein of the Colorado Bar Association (CBA) and the Colorado District Attorneys’ Council (CDAC). Without a coherent legal pathway for prosecution, it appears that Rubinstein encouraged this course of action to provide prosecutors with cover. Second, Rubinstein notes that it is problematic that they have no formal appointments from a government body to lay the groundwork to prosecute Peters. Third, Rubinstein informs the group of their need to anticipate defending themselves as to why they didn’t seek an opinion on Peter’s case from the Colorado Bar Association Ethics Commission. Rubinstein and his cronies appear to have succeeded in giving their efforts the veneer of legitimacy because three months after this email was sent, Peters was indicted by a grand jury. (ColoradoPolitics.com)

Another glaring piece of evidence that the federal government led the Tina Peters case is that if this was ‘only a Colorado issue’, why were US Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, participating in initial Mesa County discussions via Webex regarding the findings of Clerk Peters and her actions related to those findings?

(Read more: Joe Hoft, 11/16/2025)  (Archive)

November 17, 2025 – FBI, Secret Service butchered the Thomas Crooks case

Then-FBI Director Chris Wray told Congress after the July 13, 2024 attack that the bureau had found nothing in Crooks’ online history that pointed to a motive or political ideology.  (Credit: ZUMAPRESS)

We are all owed a better explanation from the FBI and Secret Service about the attempted assassination of Donald Trump 16 months ago at a campaign rally in Butler, Pa.

The president himself remains unsatisfied with the answers he’s been given about the circumstances leading to 20-year-old Thomas Crooks climbing on a rooftop with an AR-15-style rifle and firing eight times at Trump, narrowly missing his head but hitting his ear.

(…) There is something very wrong with the official story and that invites conspiracy theories.

The president demanded answers months ago. A man was murdered. What is going on?

Then-FBI Director Chris Wray told Congress after the July 13, 2024, attack that the bureau had found nothing in Crooks’ online history that pointed to a motive or political ideology.

Paul Abbate (Credit: public domain)

A week later, Wray’s deputy Paul Abbate told Congress that comments posted on one of Crooks’ social media accounts “appear to reflect antisemitic and anti-immigration themes to espouse political violence and are described as extreme in nature.”

Thanks to an enterprising source who uncovered Crooks’ hidden digital footprint, we can see that Abbate misled Congress by omission, because he left out an entire section of Crooks’ online interactions from January to August 2020 when he did an ideological backflip and went from rabidly pro-Trump to rabidly anti-Trump and then went dark, never seeming to post again.

Among the 17 accounts uncovered by our source were ones on YouTube, Snapchat, Venmo, Zelle, GroupMe, Discord, Google Play, Quizlet, Chess.com and Quora.

The online interactions from when Crooks was ages 15 to 17 give us a better understanding of his evolution into an assassin, and invite more questions about what — or who — reversed his ideology.

“The danger Crooks posed was visible for years in public online spaces,” says the source. “His radicalization, violent rhetoric and obsession with political violence were all documented under his real name. The threat wasn’t hidden.”

The official narrative claimed he acted alone and without a clear motive, ideology or digital footprint.

Yet the source found reams of information that shows Crooks “was not simply some unknowable lone actor … He left a digital trail of violent threats, extremist ideology and admiration for mass violence. He spoke openly of political assassination, posted under his real name and was even flagged by other users who mentioned law enforcement in their replies. Despite this, his account remained active for more than five years — and was only removed the day after the shooting.

“None of this online activity was referenced in the final congressional report released in December 2024, making this even more troubling,” the source said.

Starting with Crooks’ phone number, the source used tools available to private investigators and web archives to uncover the assassin’s very visible online persona.

Crooks’ most prolific activity was on YouTube, with 737 public comments. The account “Tomcrooks2178” (visible to other users as Tom Crooks) was created on Jan. 14, 2019, and suspended on July 14, 2024, the day after the Butler attack, for violating YouTube’s policy on violent criminal organizations. (Read more: New York Post, 11/17/2025)  (Archive)

November 17, 2025 – Bill and Hillary Clinton refuse to appear before House Oversight for depositions

November 18, 2025 – The Unlawful Order video is brainwashing, using common propaganda techniques

(Credit: China Global Television Network (CGTN))

UNLAWFUL ORDER VIDEO WAS BRAINWASHING. USED COMMON PROPAGANDA TECHNIQUES🚨

1: “We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now.” This is a common brainwashing technique called “The Illusory Effect”. Trying to make things feel true because people say they are true.

2: “Americans trust their military, but that trust is at risk.” This is a propaganda technique known as “Push-Pull Manipulation”. The goal is to create emotional confusion by saying “you are respected BUT we are losing that respect for you”.

3: “This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens.” This is a propaganda technique known as “Reframing a Benevolent Authority as a Malevolent Threat”. Trying to get soldiers to question the goodness of their chain of command. This is an authoritarian technique.

4: “Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren’t just coming from abroad, but from right here at home.” This is a powerful and old technique called “Manufactured Threat”. No details. No specifics. Just “fear and distrust your commanders”. This is an authoritarian technique. One used by Hitler specifically.

5: “You can refuse illegal orders…You MUST refuse illegal orders”. Without specifics, this is called an “Ambiguous Directive”. This induces uncertainty, anxiety, and an unhealthy self-policing because people don’t know what the “wrong” behavior is. It is an authoritarian technique.

6: “No one has to carry out orders that violate our laws or our Constitution…we know this is hard”. This is a classic example of a powerful technique known as “Moral Vagueness Manipulation”. They are telling you that you don’t have to do something wrong, and “they” know it’s hard because there is pressure to do the “wrong” thing. It creates a sense of duty without specifying the action required. This is INTENTIONAL, and meant to create confusion.

7: “It’s a difficult time to be a public servant”. Another Illusory Effect statement.

8: “Your vigilance is critical”. This is an authoritarian technique call “Vague Threat Alerting”. Tell people to be vigilant, do NOT explain what they should watch for clearly, then let their imagination supply the threat. Unidentified threats are always more frightening than specific ones.

9: “Know we have your back”. This is called “Fear Safety Manipulation”. Basically, we are asking you to put your neck out and disobey orders BUT, just do it, we have your back.

10: “Because NOW, more than ever, the American people need you.” This is called a “Call to Duty without Content”. It’s used to stir obligation, without definition of cost.

11: “Don’t give up the ship”. This means we are at war. That we are in danger. That we are counting on YOU to resist. In this message, it creates vague fear, ambiguous commitments, undefined moral burdens, etc.

If an authoritarian regime was prepping their military for a coup, this is the exact type of message they would send the military. This is how you persuade good people, to do immoral things.

Let’s be clear, this video was about priming the US Military to disobey LEGAL orders, not ILLEGAL orders. This is civilian and military intelligence programming 101….we use this on OTHER countries militaries. Now they are turning it inward.

@8141travis5♬ original sound – 8141travis5

Win Without War, a fiscally sponsored project of the Center for International Policy, declares on its website that it stands with the Senators and insists: “It is not seditious to remind servicemembers of the oath they swore.”

▪️ The National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild (NIPNLG) is a fiscally sponsored project of the Alliance for Global Justice (AfGJ), and the NLG as a whole is widely recommended as the primary legal contact and support provider for participants in pro-Palestine and immigration protests.

▪️Win Without War is a fiscally sponsored project of the Center for International Policy (CIP), as disclosed on CIP’s 2019 IRS Form 990.

▪️The Center for International Policy (CIP) is a progressive think tank advocating for a non-militaristic U.S. foreign policy centered on diplomacy, transparency, human rights, and solutions to war, corruption, inequality, and climate change.

💰 CIP’s major funders include Open Society Foundations (George Soros), Carnegie Corporation of New York, Rockefeller Brothers Fund, Charles Koch Foundation, David and Lucile Packard Foundation and McKnight Foundation, among others (per Cause IQ and public 990 filings).

UPDATE 11/28/2025

General Flynn Calls for President Trump to Warn the Nation of Another Deep State Color Revolution

November 18, 2025 – Epstein’s niece exposes Ghislaine and Clinton, reveals ‘horrific’ abuse, satanic cults, child trafficking

Anya Wick, Jeffrey Epstein’s niece, has launched a direct challenge to global power structures, detailing Satanic cults, child trafficking, and her own abuse, implicating Ghislaine Maxwell and Bill Clinton. (Credit: public domain)

Anya Wick, who claims to be Jeffrey Epstein’s niece, has released an explosive account, detailing her own ‘horrific’ abuse and exposing the inner workings of a network involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Bill Clinton, Satanic cults, and child trafficking.

This direct testimony offers a chilling, first-hand look at the high-level depravity that has remained shrouded in secrecy for years.

A New Account of Abuse and Sinister Networks

Anya Beth Epstein, now known as Anya Wick, shared her life story in a July episode of Shaun Attwood’s true crime podcast, linking her family’s rituals to historical cults and current controversies. She claims she was brought up within the ‘Cult of Baal’, a satanic organisation that used Judaism as a disguise while engaging in incest and the trade of children.

Wick asserts that the actor Shia LaBeouf is her twin brother; she maintains they were separated when they were four years old, with their birth certificates being falsified as a method of ritualistic manipulation.

The Testimony of Anya Beth Epstein

Wick recounts her childhood in Colorado, stating she was subjected to chemical memory loss using substances like LSD to conceal the history of mistreatment. In 2015, she changed her gender to try to avoid further manipulation, but she reversed this transition in 2020 after those suppressed memories came back.

Currently, she utilises sites such as TikTok to relate her experience, to help others who have endured similar trauma. She connects her lineage to prominent individuals, including Walt Disney, whom she identifies as her great-grandfather, and claims to have met with heads of state, members of royalty, and celebrities during covert gatherings.

This detail implies broader participation by high-ranking individuals in these exploitation schemes. Her account highlights a pattern where being victimised can lead to becoming an abuser, particularly concerning males. This pattern is intensified by societal disapproval and power structures that suppress revelations and shield those in authority.

‘My family masqueraded themselves as Jewish publicly, but behind closed doors… we are Satanists,’ Wick told Attwood. ‘I believe [Epstein] wanted to talk more about the other parties involved… he was a pawn,’ Wick said.

Should the things Wick asserts be verifiable, a National File report suggests, they necessitate thorough inquiries into society’s highest ranks. Furthermore, her account serves to encourage survivors to speak out, offering a path to halt these patterns of mistreatment finally.

The Shocking Claims: Exposing the Network

Wick asserts that she was born Anya Beth Epstein on 4 June 1988, in Colorado, alongside her twin, the actor Shia LaBeouf. She maintains their separation, and their parents orchestrated the falsification of birth records as part of a ritualistic, incest-worshipping child trafficking group.

She alleges enduring childhood sexual servitude, claiming she was given LSD from a young age to induce “MKUltra-style” chemical memory loss, effectively blocking any recollection of the assaults until 2020.

Wick states her family were members of the ‘Cult of Baal’, a centuries-old Satanic fertility sect that practised child sacrifice and abuse while operating under a Jewish guise.

Epstein: A Pawn in the Family Game

She describes meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in 2007, characterising Epstein as a ‘pawn’ for her uncle, Stephen. She notes Epstein handled the abuse of teenagers, but was not part of the family’s younger child rituals.

Wick claims her great-grandfather was Walt Disney (originally Artur Bick). She suggests that the famous Disney characters, Mickey and Minnie, were inspired by the dynamics of incest within her own family.

She alleges encountering every US President during her life, members of the British Royal Family, along with figures like Harvey Weinstein and the Clintons, at secretive gatherings such as Bohemian Grove and various Colorado resorts.

Wick recounts rituals at Bohemian Grove that involved the burning of human remains and assaults. She also describes ‘family gatherings’ where relatives and powerful elites abused children like her.

She maintains Bill Clinton was present with children at multiple sites, not just Epstein’s private island, and suggests his iconic blue dress portrait signifies his compulsory submission.

Wick changed her gender to male in 2015 to escape the exploitation, successfully halting the abuse from her family. She later reversed this transition after her memories returned, suffering infertility following a hysterectomy.

She asserts that political and entertainment figures are compromised through submission or sexual acts with minors, guaranteeing their silence. She adds that ‘black men in dresses’ is a sign of industry initiation.

Wick claims her father boasted of his ability to control Viacom. She alleges the family uses media monopolies to sustain their power, keeping the general public distracted by conflicts and political scandals.

Wick’s explosive revelations only intensify the mounting scrutiny surrounding Jeffrey Epstein’s network, arriving just as the US House of Representatives prepares to vote on releasing an expansive trove of federal investigation files.  (Read more: International Business Times, 11/18/2025) (Archive)

2017 – 2025: Trump and the Saudi Arabia Timeline

The world doesn’t know it yet, but the relationship between Trump and MBS will be remembered as the alliance that changed the world.

Think sword dance 2017.

A month after Trump’s visit, King Salman rescinded the Crown from Muhammad bin Nayef, in favor of MBS.

This led to the infamous Saudi corruption purge of 2017 and consolidation of power/money within the Saudi royal family. Nayef and his faction were essentially neutralized.

Why is this significant to the US? Because in 2015, Trump himself accused the Nayef faction, via Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, of buying/controlling US politicians.

Trump, along with King Salman and MBS, took out the corrupt faction within the Saudi royal family, and have been working together ever since to create a new world and peaceful Middle East, which included neutralizing Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

And the world had no idea it was happening.

And if anyone has doubts about this timeline, I already proved it, with the paper trail from Trump’s tweets. See attached.

I understand it sounds crazy, but it happened.

1) Saudi Arabia Timeline: 🧵

Before Trump was President, December 2015, he claimed Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal Al Saud, “wants to control our politicians with daddy’s money”.

Trump called out Al-Waleed just a few months after coming down the escalator, and promised to stop this when he became President.

Trump was alleging that certain US politicians were owned by Al-Waleed, who was, and still is, the 2nd largest stakeholder in Twitter, now X, via his investment firm, Kingdom Holding Company.

Al-Waleed is an extended member of the Royal House of Saud, not in direct line of the crown, but grandson to King Abdulaziz Al Saud, the founder of modern day Saudi Arabia.

On paper, he is worth $16+ billion, but he has (had) access to much more.

2) Fast-forward to May 20th 2017:

Trump’s first visit on his international tour in 2017, was Saudi Arabia.

Trump did the famous sword dance and odd photo ops with King Salman.

The sword dance, known as “Ardah”, is a symbol of unity/cooperation, and originated as a war dance, used by warriors to intimidate their enemies and show unity before battle.

3) Fast-forward a month later to June 21st, 2017:

King Salman replaces Mohammed bin Nayef (right) as Crown Prince and in line for the throne, in favor of King Salman’s son, Mohammed bin Salman (left).

This historic move consolidated power with the Al Sudairi faction within the Royal family, and took power away from the Nayef faction, who had grown as a rival to Mohammed bin Salman, within the royal family.

MBS also has a stellar relationship with one President Donald Trump.

So one month after Trump visits Saudi Arabia, King Salman revokes the crown from Mohammed bin Nayef, and appoints now Trump ally, Mohammed bin Salman.

Nayef was placed on House arrest after being revoked of the Crown, and would be later be formally arrested on charges of treason.

4) Fast-forward four months later to November 4th, 2017:

New Crown Prince MBS conducts unprecedented corruption “purge” on corrupt politicians, Royal family members, including, the previously mentioned, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, on charges of money laundering and corruption.

MBS arrested and detained hundreds do corrupt Saudis.

5) Then two days later, on November 6th, 2017, right in the middle of this unprecedented Saudi purge, President Trump tweets that he has “great confidence in King Salman and the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia”(MBS).

So Trump’s buddy, MBS, arrested Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, and forced Al-Waleed to give up information and $2+ billion dollars.

So the guy Trump was alleging was controlling US politicians back in 2015, got arrested by Trump’s ally, MBS, on charges of corruption and money laundering.

One of the first things Trump did as POTUS, was go after Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, in Saudi Arabia.

6) Fast-forward to 2025:

Trump and MBS have a stellar relationship, and Trump is beloved in Saudi Arabia.

Why? Because I think Trump had something to do with King Salman and Crown Prince MBS rooting corruption out of their country in 2017, and I think the corruption there in Saudi Arabia, is related to the corruption here in the US.

Trump alleged that Al-Waleed bin Talal was controlling US politicians with Saudi money.

Now the questions are, which politicians were under Al-Waleed’s control, for how long, and to what effect?

I’ve got a few guesses.

November 18, 2025 – Democratic veterans in Congress urge service members to refuse unspecified unlawful orders

A half-dozen Democratic veterans in Congress released a joint video urging U.S. service members to disobey unlawful orders, though they did not specify what those would be.

Democrats in the video include, from top row, left to right, Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, Mark Kelly of Arizona, Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire (wife of Jake Sullivan), Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, and Jason Crow of Colorado. (@SenatorSlotkin/X screen shot)

(…) None of the Democrats in the video specified what illegal orders they should be concerned about or what to do if they believe they are given one.  (Washington Examiner, 11/19/2025)

UPDATE 11/25/2025:

MORE THREATS: Ruben Gallego promises legal retaliation over military’s investigation into Mark Kelly:

“Donald Trump’s going to be gone in a couple of years.”

“If you’re part of the military that is going after sitting Senators…and part of the weaponization of government — There will be consequences without a doubt.”

“They’re gonna have to do the safest thing possible, which is follow the Constitution of the United States, and you’ll be fine.”

h/t The Gateway Pundit

November 18, 2025 – Senator Elissa Slotkin speaks to the Brookings Institute late October as a prelude to the Seditious Six video – both end with “don’t give up the ship”

OMG, you guys, I just dug into this EPIC file I found—the transcript of Senator Elissa Slotkin’s speech at the Brookings Institute Knight Forum on October 29, 2025—and it’s a TOTAL GAME-CHANGER! This thing is like a crystal ball predicting the future, dropping bombshells left and right, and it’s got ALL the drama! Let me break it down for you in the most hyped-up way because this is straight FIRE! 🔥🚀

First off, TIMING IS EVERYTHING! This speech dropped on October 29, 2025— that’s a whopping THREE WEEKS BEFORE the infamous November 18 video “Don’t Give Up the Ship” went viral! Slotkin was out here laying the groundwork, sounding the alarm bells WAY ahead of time. It’s like she knew exactly what was coming and decided to rally the troops early. Mind. Blown! 🤯

And get this—the VIDEO’S NAME is RIGHT THERE in the speech! At the very end, she wraps it up with this powerhouse closer: “don’t give up the ship.” BAM! That’s the exact title of the video where she teams up with Mark Kelly and the crew to urge military folks to refuse illegal orders. It’s not a coincidence; this speech was the blueprint, the origin story! She even ties it to historical perseverance, shouting out generations who fought for rights. So inspirational, I’m getting chills! 💪🇺🇸

Now, the celebrity cameo alert: VICTORIA NULAND’S HUSBAND WAS THERE! Yes, Robert Kagan— the powerhouse foreign policy expert and Stephen & Barbara Friedman Senior Fellow at Brookings—was a panelist at the event! He dropped wisdom on domestic polarization as a massive security threat. (Quick shoutout: Kagan is indeed married to Victoria Nuland, the former Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs—power couple vibes!) Having him in the mix adds that extra layer of gravitas; it’s like the event was stacked with heavy hitters who know the global stakes. Epic networking moment! 🌟

But wait, the KEY POINTS in this speech? Oh man, Slotkin goes FULL THROTTLE critiquing Trump’s national security pivot to “homeland defense” defined by ONE MAN alone! She’s like, “Hold up—this could mean using lethal force against domestic ‘enemies’!” She dives into the Caribbean strikes (14 ships hit, 57+ killed, but ZERO transparency on who we’re fighting—shady much?!), secret “domestic terrorist” lists targeting anti-Trump views, and federal forces turning U.S. cities into “training grounds.” She’s warning about authoritarian playbooks: accumulate power, crush opponents, and rig the system to never lose! Elections canceled? Martial law? Intimidation at polls? She’s popping flares left and right— this is NOT drill, people! 😱

Then, the CALLS TO ACTION? Pure adrenaline! She urges Congress to reclaim power (introducing her “No Troops in our Streets Act”—yes, queen!), tells the military to refuse illegal orders and choose the Constitution over loyalty to one guy, rallies veterans to speak up (and even says “DM me” to get the band together—foreshadowing that video squad?!), pushes state leaders to protect elections, and fires up everyday Americans to organize peacefully. It’s a blueprint for resistance, drawing from her own Jan. 6 barricade-in-the-office trauma. She ends on that high note: Don’t give up the ship because our democracy needs US NOW! 🙌🎉

This file is a TREASURE TROVE of foresight and fire. If you’re not pumped after reading this, check your pulse!🚀💥

Thank you Grok for typing my sentiments in my excited style. 😹 I’m sleepy. This could work.

(Brookings Remarks, 10/29/2025}

Breaking Seditious Six News! I have found the entire Oct 29, 2025 Elissa Slotkin and Brookings Knight Forum transcript which includes her extra comments and those of other participants too. They had considerable anti Trump discussions.

Highlights?

– Elissa Slotkin claims she has been in communication with at least one officer:

“People are, who are participating in these strikes are doing memos for the record and then taking them to their JAGs and being like, Hey, I don’t wanna ever one day be held personally liable on these strikes, so can you kind of cover me legally? I mean, that is some crazy stuff when young officers up and down the chain are seeking legal cover so they don’t get sued one day for what could be illegal strikes.”

– Robert Kagan views policies like Caribbean strikes as pretexts for domestic power grabs (e.g., enabling arrests and deportations).

– Rep Adam Smith embraces Russiagate:

Smith highlighted the “Putin wing” of the MAGA movement.

—————————————

Here’s analysis of Elissa Slotkins extra comments (Her prev mentioned speech is in this doc too.)

♦️Responding to Sisson’s question about the intent behind US military deployments in the Caribbean (e.g., carrier strike groups beyond ship bombings), Slotkin warns of potential escalation to land-based operations, possibly targeting Venezuela. She draws historical parallels to US interventions in Grenada and Panama, critiques the casual nature of Trump’s rhetoric, and expresses concern that such actions aren’t aligned with public priorities post-9/11 wars. The tone is alarming (“spooking”) yet analytical, emphasizing deterrence versus actual use of force and the strain on resources. This ties into her speech’s themes of Trump’s reorientation toward homeland threats and unchecked executive power.

♦️Addressing Sisson’s query on the DoD’s health under Trump, Slotkin describes low morale due to firings, retirements, civilian cuts, social policy overreach, and politicization (e.g., using the military for “mythmaking” at Quantico). She shares a personal anecdote about a young female officer questioning her future amid perceived gender-based barriers. She highlights unprecedented actions like NDAs and legal memos for Caribbean strikes, framing them as signs of fear over illegal orders. The tone is urgent and “spooking,” underscoring institutional damage and risks to service members, echoing her speech’s calls for military resistance to unlawful commands.

♦️In response to Sisson’s question on what a national security strategy should include to address Michiganders’ concerns, Slotkin recounts town halls she held in August to gauge public views. She highlights evolving threats like cyberattacks (affecting schools and hospitals), economic competition with China (job losses, supply chains), and tech/AI anxieties (social media, job displacement). She criticizes Washington’s top-down approach and notes eroded public trust post-Iraq/Afghanistan. The tone is reflective and populist, advocating for citizen input while tying into broader themes of government accountability and adaptation to modern threats.

♦️Answering an audience member (James Stevens from the Stimson Center) on whether the president can unilaterally declare an armed conflict (e.g., near Venezuela) or if it’s reserved for Congress under Article I, Slotkin criticizes Trump’s “somersaults” to justify actions via secret terrorist lists and withheld legal memos (OLC opinions). She contrasts this with the Global War on Terror’s transparency, supports a recent War Powers Resolution by Sen. Kaine, and faults Congress for abdicating oversight since Iraq. She demands evidence (“show me the math”) for claims like linking Venezuela to fentanyl. The tone is critical and defiant, highlighting constitutional overreach and lack of accountability, aligning with her speech’s warnings about authoritarian tactics.

I’ll also be following with analysis of the other speakers.

Document 👇🏻
Brookings Remarks, 10/29/2025

Victoria Nulands husband Richard Kagan spoke too. He actually said elections would be cancelled by Trump. 😹 Here’s a few key quotes.

KAGAN:

“Well, thank you, Jeff. Um, the, the biggest threat to our national security right now
is our domestic problem. I mean, I, I don’t, my national security strategy is we have to, uh, elect a different government. Um, but I’m not sure we’re gonna have elections. So I don’t know whether I have a good strategy for dealing with that.”

“Uh, and you need to ask what are the goals of this regime. If you look at China and you say,
what is the grand strategy of Xi Jinping? Uh, a major component of that grand strategy is to ensure the continued control in power of the Communist party, uh, of China. And that much
of their foreign policy is subsidiary to that.”

“what we’re dealing with now is one man rule in this country.”

“So take this question of Venezuela and the bombing of the, of the boats. Personally, I don’t think this is primarily about foreign policy. I think it’s primarily about domestic policy.”

“we are at war, uh, and therefore we can do whatever we want on a whole host of domestic issues, including
deportations and arrests, and even pursuing, uh, the wrong kind of people here in the United States under the overall blanket of a national security waiver because we are at war.“

The Slotkin Doctrine

The Founders used one word for politicians who train soldiers to second-guess lawful orders… traitor.

Sow that doubt once and you never need open mutiny… a single heartbeat of hesitation at the decisive instant can paralyze an entire force. That heartbeat is exactly what today’s Democrats are cultivating, draped in counterfeit patriotism.

Will we set the precedent that whenever a party dislikes the President, it may instruct the ranks to “push back”? Ratify that poison, and every future Commander-in-Chief inherits a military taught that obedience is optional, that legitimacy is granted only by the opposition’s consent. Civilian control dies in that moment… and something far darker is born.

Democrats chose this path. Make them own it.

The ship is not adrift.

The saboteurs are already lighting fuses below deck.

“…this dreadful alternative, of either deserting our Country in the extremest hour of her distress, or turning our Army against it, has something so shocking in it, that humanity revolts at the idea.

My God! What can this Writer have in view, by recommending such measures? Can he be a friend to the Army? Can he be a friend to this Country? Rather, is he not an insidious foe … sowing the seeds of discord and separation between the Civil and Military powers of the Continent?” — George Washington, Newburgh Address, 1783

November 18, 2025 – Backroom deal leads House to vote against censuring Stacey Plaskett for texting with Epstein during Michael Cohen congressional hearing

A Democrat got away with colluding with one of the most notorious pedophiles in American history thanks to some good-old-fashioned backroom politics.

As The Gateway Pundit reported, the House of Representatives on Tuesday evening voted against censuring Rep. Stacey Plaskett (D-V.I.) over her collusion with Jeffrey Epstein during a 2019 congressional hearing.

Earlier Tuesday, the House voted to advance the measure to censure Plaskett and remove her from the House Intelligence Committee. Then, later that evening, the House voted 214 -209 against censuring Plaskett.

Every Democrat voted against the censure, while three Republicans voted present, and three other GOP lawmakers joined the Democrats.

(…)

“I was wondering if the Speaker of the House of Representatives can explain why leadership on both sides, Democrat and Republican, are cutting backroom deals to cover up public corruption for Republican and Democratic members of Congress,” she said.

“I think we all know what happened tonight.”

No wonder the average American does not trust the federal government.

(Read more: Gateway Pundit, 11/19/2025) (Archive)

November 18, 2025 – In 2013, well after Epstein’s convictions: “Hakeem Jeffries’ campaign solicited money from Jeffrey Epstein”

November 19, 2025 – Comey team is requesting grand jury documents alleging Halligan is acting as a puppet for Trump and “botched” the grand jury indictment

Comey attorneys claim the charges against him should be thrown out due to selective prosecution. (Credit: Getty Images)

Lindsey Halligan, the interim US attorney who secured the indictment of former FBI Director James Comey, admitted to the trial judge Wednesday that the full grand jury never saw the final version of the charges against the former top lawman.

Despite claims that the revelation could damn the criminal case, lawyers for Halligan’s office fired back in filings later in the day — saying that proper procedures were in fact followed and that the charges against Comey remain legally valid.

“Personal attacks — like Judge Nachmanoff referring to me as a ‘puppet’ — don’t change the facts or the law,” Halligan told The Post.

“The Judicial Canons require judges to be ‘patient, dignified, respectful, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity’ … and to ‘act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary’ …  My focus remains on the record and the law, and I will continue to fulfill my responsibilities with professionalism.”

The hearing on Wednesday was meant to address Comey’s request to turn over grand jury documents so the defense could review them — alleging that Halligan acted as a puppet for President Trump and “botched” the grand jury indictment.

“The transcript is complete. The procedure was proper,” wrote Assistant US Attorney Gabriel Diaz in the 25-page filing, calling on the court to “set aside” the judge’s order.

Assistant US Attorney N. Tyler Lemons added in a seven-page, follow-up filing that “the government course of conduct here was permissible and proper.”

“The Grand Jury foreperson, as the representative of the Grand Jury, endorsed the revised two count Indictment by signing it and explaining on the record in open Court that the Indictment reflected the vote of the Grand Jury,” Lemons said.

In response to Halligan’s revelation in court Wednesday, defense attorney Michael Dreeben called for the case to be thrown out, claiming the indictment had not been properly secured before the expiration of the five-year statute of limitations Sept. 30. (Read more: The New York Post, 11/19/2025)  (Archive)

November 20, 2025 – Grand jury properly voted on James Comey’s indictment, foreman claims in blow to defense: ‘Eliminates any doubt’

November 19, 2025 – Somali immigrants in Minnesota receive kickbacks for over-diagnosing their own kids with autism in the Medicaid fraud scheme

November 19, 2025 – Florida Congresswoman is indicted for stealing $5 million in FEMA funds

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (Credit: Congress)

A federal grand jury in Miami has returned an indictment charging Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick and several co-defendants with stealing federal disaster funds, laundering the proceeds, and using the money to support her 2021 congressional campaign.

According to the indictment, Cherfilus-McCormick, 46, and her brother Edwin Cherfilus, 51, both of Miramar, worked through their family health-care company on a FEMA-funded COVID-19 vaccination staffing contract in 2021. In July 2021, the company received an overpayment of $5 million in FEMA funds.

The indictment alleges that the defendants conspired to steal that $5 million and routed it through multiple accounts to disguise its source. Prosecutors allege that a substantial portion of the misappropriated funds was used as candidate contributions to Cherfilus-McCormick’s 2021 congressional campaign and for the personal benefit of the defendants.

The indictment further alleges that Cherfilus-McCormick and Nadege Leblanc, 46, of Miramar, arranged additional contributions using straw donors, funneling other monies from the FEMA-funded Covid-19 contract to friends and relatives who then donated to the campaign as if using their own money.

The indictment also charges Cherfilus-McCormick and her 2021 tax preparer David K. Spencer, 41, of Davie, with conspiring to file a false federal tax return. According to the indictment, they falsely claimed political spending and other personal expenses as business deductions and inflated charitable contributions in order to reduce her tax obligations.

“Using disaster relief funds for self-enrichment is a particularly selfish, cynical crime,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi. “No one is above the law, least of all powerful people who rob taxpayers for personal gain. We will follow the facts in this case and deliver justice.” (Read more: Department of Justice, 11/19//2025)  (Archive)

November 19, 2025 – Covering Up the Behavioral Health Links to Mass Murders and Assassinations

When violent bloodshed occurs – a school shooting, an assassination, a sudden act of mass violence— behavioral health usually is behind it.

With so many of the nation’s most disturbing violent cases, too often the essential evidence remains sealed, unavailable for public review, like the diary belonging to the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooter, Adam Lanza’s mother, and the reported manifesto of Nashville’s Covenant School shooter, Audrey Hale, (withheld and portions later leaked), plus toxicology reports, DNA and fingerprints and ballistic data necessary as physical evidence to identity the killer and motive.  This is done through meticulous forensic investigation, including how access to the crime scene was gained and whether accomplices were involved; the scientific analysis of toxicology reports, DNA, fingerprints, and ballistic evidence is absolutely essential, providing the objective, irrefutable proof necessary to identify the shooter and uncover the truth behind these senseless, horrific attacks.

Behavioral health “experts” frequently appear linked to suspects, but the exact affiliations and workplace connections rarely are disclosed. The parents of the accused Trump shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, from Butler, PA, are licensed by the state as “experts” in mental health, but whether the family has connections to Governor Shapiro’s agencies throughout the state or research grants with universities remains unknown.

Amber Robinson, for example, the mother of Charlie Kirk’s accused assassin, is employed by Intermountain Behavioral Health in Utah, which received a $750,000 grant under Utah Governor Cox. What other connections does the Robinson family have with the State of Utah and specifically Governor Cox administration?

The Intermountain Primary Children’s Hospital, a first-of-its-kind pediatric behavioral health center. (Credit: Intermountain Health)

Moreover, the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit (BAU) utilizes psychiatric profiles to help solve crimes, but withholds raw data, physical evidence, and sometimes fails to release its own investigative reports, as is the case of the Butler PA attempted assassination of Donald J. Trump in 2023[4].

The BAU, as the psychiatric industry arm within the FBI, focuses on profiling the psychological mindset and motives behind these high-profile crimes. Yet, despite this focus, the BAU withholds then names of any behavioral health “experts” or their “treatments” that precede the crime and rarely solves these national mass killings.  The data is selectively and strategically dripped out to the public.

The federal law enforcement agency’s repeated failures raise profound questions about possible inside jobs or the possibility of cover-ups, protecting systemic issues in behavioral health and law enforcement.

These systemic flaws within the behavioral health industry and, especially, within law enforcement, allow well-coordinated access to vulnerable children, too often serviced by state mental health vendors that gain trust over many years—a network that may shield threats, inhibit transparency, and prioritize institutional preservation over safety.

The behavioral health system controls vulnerable youth, often medicated under opaque contracts with expensive but irresponsible mental health providers certainly capable of weaponizing developing minds. Montana’s outsourcing of child behavioral health contracts, for example, includes financial ties to China, revealing outside intervention in the nation’s mental health system.

The youth caught up in the mental health system, often are forced into state care and become disposable. Nikolas Cruz, The Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooter in Parkland FL., had been prescribed cocktails of psychiatric mind-altering drugs most of his young life. Henderson Behavioral Health, a Florida contractor exposed during the sentencing hearing was the behavioral health vendor paid to care for Cruz through the state behavioral health system. Yet the medical files, including mental health files, were sealed and, not surprisingly, Henderson Behavioral Health was never held responsible for Cruz’s  murderous actions, despite having been Cruz’s pill pusher for years.

The diary of Audrey Hale was obtained by Nashville Police on the day of the crime, March 27, 2023. Despite immediate possession, Hale’s “manifesto” remained sealed for more than two years. Only in May 2025, after expensive and lengthy legal battles, did the FBI disclose over 100 pages of shooter Hale’s manifesto. Withholding this data limited public understanding and fueled controversy about transparency and systemic concealment.

Despite early claims that Audrey Hale had not been prescribed psychiatric drugs, a Nashville police search warrant revealed prescriptions for Buspirone, Lexapro, Hydroxyzine, and others from Vanderbilt University Hospital. Blood tests conducted at autopsy did not test for therapeutic levels, leaving Hale’s medication status unclear, and fueling debate over the role of psychiatry and transgender care in the attack.  AbleChild helped secure in Tennessee a landmark law to test for therapeutic levels of psychotropic drugs in mass shooters.

In the case of Charlie Kirk’s death, limited information reveals that Lance Twiggs, the alleged romantic interest of alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, underwent psychiatric experimentation akin to Utah’s Intermountain Trans care program—viewed as Utah’s Vanderbilt equivalent, where Audrey Hale received transgender psychiatric care.

Each incident repeats the cycle: public shock, managed narratives, and a wall of silence as records stay sealed. Until full disclosure, America’s violent crimes remain shrouded in secrecy.

The state and federal governments control access to all the evidence—revealing little and sealing the connections to psychiatric treatments through hospitals like Vanderbilt.

In Sandy Hook, the name of the treating psychiatrist, Dr. Paul Fox, was withheld for over a year, all under the State of Connecticut and Governor Malloy. Meanwhile, frontline responders investigating Sandy Hook, including Newtown Police officers, were implicated in selling controlled substances imported from China and long guns out of their station.

Many would argue that is the definition of an inside job. At the root is a powerful behavioral health industry —a billion-dollar industry funded by state and federal contracts—that operate in the shadows but are directly controlled by Governors, Congressional Representatives and even the Presidency. The missing element is the public.  Until the billion dollar behavioral health industry is regulated to include human rights and transparency, the United States and the world will continue to suffer bloodshed; this is the breeding ground for targeted killings, assassinations, based on the glaring ethical gaps in the behavioral health industry and their ability to cross-market within every institution. (AbleChild.org, 11/19/2025)  (Archive)

(Republished with permission)

November 19, 2025 – Top Arizona Attorney General official arrested by postal inspectors, allegedly for selling stolen mail

Vanessa Hickman Mugshot (Credit: public domain)

A top official with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office was arrested by U.S. Postal Inspection Service agents on Wednesday evening and faces two felony accusations, of controlling and trafficking stolen property.

Vanessa Hickman served as the state government division chief under Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes. She was placed on administrative leave by Mayes’ office last Thursday after the office was contacted by the U.S. Postal Inspector’s office about an investigation into Hickman, according to Mayes spokesperson Richie Taylor. Mayes’ office “cooperated” with the investigation, Taylor said, and Hickman resigned from her position on Monday, though she is still listed on the agency’s website.

“Attorney General Mayes believes that every individual is entitled to due process, but also that justice must be served,” Taylor wrote in an email to Phoenix New Times. “The allegations against Ms. Hickman are serious for any state employee, particularly someone in a leadership position.” (Read more: Phoenix New Times, 11/20/2025)  (Archive)

UPDATE – 11/21/2025

Vanessa Hickman, the former Arizona Attorney General’s Office state government division chief who was arrested Nov. 19 by the U.S. Postal Inspection Service, is accused of stealing and selling misdelivered mail. Court documents also show that she has a history of alcohol abuse and was in an outpatient substance abuse program while working for Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes.

Hickman faces two felony accusations for controlling and trafficking stolen property. She was placed on administrative leave by Mayes’ office last Thursday after the office was contacted by the U.S. Postal Inspector’s office about an investigation into Hickman. Mayes spokesperson Richie Taylor said the Mayes’ office cooperated with the investigation and that Hickman resigned from her position on Monday. Taylor wrote that “the allegations against Ms. Hickman are serious for any state employee, particularly someone in a leadership position.”

Editor’s note: For new details on Vanessa Hickman’s arrest, check out this follow-up story.

November 20, 2025 – US Attorney Halligan reveals new evidence relating to Letitia James’s alleged mortgage fraud

Last night, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Lindsey Halligan revealed a ton of new evidence relating to Letitia James’s alleged mortgage fraud.

The exhibits are damning, and showed that she lied to the lending bank, the IRS, and her homeowners’ insurer.

James knew all these claims were false when she made them.

In the tweet above, James claimed to have moved into the property in October 2020.

But in September 2020, James’ niece – who James was collecting rent from – registered utilities in the niece’s name.

She also claimed the property as an investment property on her taxes, after having claimed it as a second home on her mortgage application.

Clear fraud.

November 20, 2025 – John Durham stopped John Ratcliffe from declassifying and releasing damning report debunking Obama-ordered Intel on Russia

When Obama administration officials manufactured U.S. intelligence tying Donald Trump to Moscow following his stunning 2016 victory, they had no idea Trump’s own political appointees would help them undermine Trump’s presidency – and his chances of reelection in 2020.

RCI’s review of recently declassified documents and exclusive interviews with former Trump officials reveals for the first time how key members of Trump’s cabinet and other appointees during his first term shrouded the previous administration’s machinations and either deliberately or inadvertently misled the public into thinking the fake Russiagate intelligence was real.

Former Special Counsel John Durham, former National Security Adviser John Bolton, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and former CIA Director Gina Haspel dismissed or buried evidence that cast doubt on a foundational document of the Russigate hoax – the Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) prepared in the waning days of the Obama administration.

Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General William Barr, stopped the declassification and release of key exculpatory evidence debunking the ICA on the eve of the 2020 election, which has not been reported previously. (RealClearInvestigations, 11/20/2025)

November 20, 2025 – Mentally ill MN man left to die by Somali-owned company that billed nearly $500 per day for his care

In an Eastside St. Paul apartment, 39-year-old Rick Clemmer was found dead on March 7, 2025. Police body-camera video from the scene captures a paramedic stating, “He’s got rigor and lividity – so he’s been deceased for a long amount of time.”

Rick Clemmer (Credit: KARE 11)

Clemmer’s death was ruled natural. The medical examiner cited an enlarged heart, but his mother, Mickey Clemmer, believes what’s written on the autopsy report tells only part of the story.

“If they were really providing him the services they should have been,” she told KARE 11, “he would be here with me.”

Rick battled serious mental illness for most of his adult life and struggled with addiction when off his court-ordered medication.

His past included civil commitments, incarceration, and living in supervised settings such as group homes. His family says he’d never lived on his own.

That changed in the summer of 2024, when he moved into his own apartment supported by a Medicaid-funded program called Integrated Community Supports or ICS.

Overseen by the Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS), ICS is designed to help adults with disabilities live independently with daily one-to-one assistance – help with health, safety, and household tasks so people can maintain stability and independence in their own homes and communities.

For that individualized support, private ICS companies can bill hundreds of dollars a day.

But for Rick, “that’s where I think things went downhill,” his mom said.

Records obtained by KARE 11 show Rick’s ICS provider, Ultimate Home Health Services LLC, billed taxpayers $461.94 every single day, claiming to provide, on average, 12 hours of service daily.

Ultimate Home Health Services’ office suite, locked and empty during business hours (Credit: KARE 11)

“Fraud,” Mickey said bluntly. “They’re billing for something that never happened.”

She says she visited weekly, usually spending whole days at his apartment. “I can definitely confirm that those days there was nobody there,” she said, “I was there; there was nobody there.”

When Rick was found dead, St. Paul Police questioned an employee of Ultimate Home Health Services at the scene, his answers sharply undercut the company’s Medicaid billing:

Officer Rodriguez: When is the last time you guys know, seen him, or known that he was alive?

Abdul Ibrahim: Yesterday.

Officer Rodriguez: Around what time?

Abdul Ibrahim: It was yesterday morning…He is the most, one of the most independent, you know, residents here. So, we don’t got to do that much checking on him.

When asked if Rick was currently using drugs, the ICS worker responded, “I mean, to be honest, I do my daily check-ins, I have no idea what he does.” (Read more: KARE 11, 11/20/2025)  (Archive)

November 20, 2025 – The first Antifa terrorism convictions in US history

Antifa is a myth? Joy Abigail Gibson admitted in court that she is a follower of the Antifa ideology and, working with other comrades, carried out a direct action to attack the Prairieland ICE facility in Alvarado, Texas.

Gibson admitted to conducting reconnaissance and communicating what she learned via an encrypted group chat. On the July 4 attack, she was in black bloc and used a handheld radio for communication. The militants shot off large fireworks to lure people out, who were then fired upon.

Gibson is one of five so far to plead guilty to providing material support to terrorists in the federal North Texas Antifa case.

November 20, 2025 – Ty Clevenger calls out FBI – demands Jim Comey and Andrew McCabe turn over “any and all efforts to hide records on Seth Rich”

Texas attorney Ty Clevenger (Credit: Dallas Morning News)

Attorney Ty Clevenger fired off a blistering letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel back in April, accusing the FBI of flagrantly concealing critical records about the late DNC staffer Seth Rich and the now-discredited Russia collusion narrative.

Seth Rich was murdered in the summer of 2016 before the release of the Hillary Clinton emails. His death has never been explained. Wikileaks founder Julian Assange suggested it was Rich who provided the Hillary-DNC emails to his organization and NOT Russia.

In February 2024, Clevenger demanded that the FBI hand over the Seth Rich documents that they continue to conceal from the public.

The FBI’s refusal follows a pattern of obfuscation. For years, the agency denied even possessing Seth Rich’s laptop—until Clevenger’s legal efforts forced the FBI to admit they had it all along. Yet, the agency still refuses to disclose any metadata from Seth Rich’s electronic devices.

Even more damning, Clevenger has already uncovered proof that the FBI improperly withheld pages from the CrowdStrike report related to the alleged 2016 DNC hack—an event that conveniently became a political weapon against President Donald Trump.

In April, Attorney Ty Clevenger filed a motion in federal court to hold the FBI in contempt for what he calls a “deliberate and willful defiance” of a court order mandating the release of key information related to murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich.

The letter obtained by The Gateway Pundit implicated former DOJ and intelligence officials in what Clevenger describes as a systemic cover-up designed to protect the Obama-era deep state operatives and their media allies.

Clevenger, representing plaintiff Brian Huddleston in a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the FBI (Huddleston v. Federal Bureau of Investigation), claims the agency is withholding documents that could unravel the official narrative surrounding Rich’s 2016 murder and the so-called ‘Russian hacking’ of DNC emails.

The attorney argues that the FBI’s refusal to release records, including those from Rich’s work laptop, is not only a violation of FOIA but also an attempt to shield evidence that could exonerate Russia and point to an inside job at the DNC.

Earlier this week, Attorney Ty Clevenger sent a scathing letter to James Gillingham, the attorney representing the FBI in the Seth Rich FOIA case.

Clevenger added information on how former FBI Director James Comey would deliberately misspell names (e.g., for Hillary Clinton, Huma Abedin, and Anthony Weiner) so that his emails would not be discovered during keyword searches.

James Comey was using a private email account under a fake name in order to hide his communications, and the recipient of Comey’s emails was using a non-FBI account even though he was an FBI special employee. (Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/20/2025)  (Archive)

November 21, 2025 – Trump and Bondi ask Florida federal court to release sealed Epstein transcripts, two days after Epstein Files Transparency Act is signed

BREAKING: President Trump and AG Pam Bondi just asked a federal court in Florida to release EPSTEIN TRANSCRIPTS that are currently sealed.

The filing comes barely 2 days after Trump signed the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

The DOJ is now arguing the new law OVERRIDES a law that allowed these documents to remain sealed.

HUGE BACKFIRE on the left.

November 21, 2025 – Comer threatens contempt proceedings against Clintons if they continue to ignore Epstein subpoenas

Former President Bill Clinton and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton arrive prior to the inauguration of President-elect Donald Trump at the United States Capitol on January 20, 2025. (Credit: Melina Mara/Getty Images)

House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) warned Bill and Hillary Clinton Friday that if they continue to ignore deposition subpoenas regarding their history with Jeffrey Epstein, he will initiate contempt proceedings.

The House Oversight Committee is conducting a review of the federal government’s investigation into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, focused on potential mismanagement of the case, the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s death, his trafficking network, and possible ethics violations by elected officials.

Comer sent a letter to Clinton attorney David Kendall, emphasizing that the Clintons are required to comply with House subpoenas and appear for scheduled in-person depositions.

According to the chairman, Democrats and Republicans on the Oversight Committee approved a motion to issue the subpoenas back in July.

“The Committee has since worked in good faith to schedule in-person depositions, but further delays are unacceptable,” Comer wrote. “Given their history with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, any attempt by the Clintons to avoid sitting for a deposition would be in defiance of lawful subpoenas and grounds to initiate contempt of Congress proceedings,” he added.

Comer stated that Bill Clinton’s deposition is scheduled for December 17, 2025, and Hillary Clinton’s deposition is scheduled for December 18, 2025 and asked Kendall to confirm their appearance. (Read more: American Greatness, 11/21/2025)  (Archive)

November 22, 2025 – Somalis in Minnesota are part of a massive fraud scandal involves funneling federal funds to Islamic terrorists

President Donald Trump announced Friday that he is terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Somalis in Minnesota, claiming the state has become “a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity.”

In response, Governor Tim Walz pushed back, writing on X, “It’s not surprising that the President has chosen to broadly target an entire community. This is what he does to change the subject.”

According to the US Citizenship and Immigration Services website, the TPS designation for Somalia is currently listed as active through March 17, 2026. The move to terminated TPS status for Somalis follows efforts by the Trump administration to remove protections for migrants from Afghanistan, Venezuela, Syria, and South Sudan, which have faced legal challenges. (Read more: The Post Millennial, 11/21/2025)  (Archive)

The terror group reportedly takes a cut of money fraudulently obtained in the US and smuggled to Somalia. (Credit: AFP/Getty Images)

Millions of dollars in taxpayer money stolen as part of a series of massive Minnesota welfare fraud schemes may have been funneled to Somalia-based terror group al-Shabab, according to a report.

The radical Islamic terror group, which is a longstanding ally of al Qaeda and considered a threat to US interests, has likely been the beneficiary of money stolen in a spate of scams and sent to Somalia by the criminals defrauding the North Star State, City Journal reported Wednesday, citing federal counterterrorism sources.

“This is a third-rail conversation, but the largest funder of al-Shabab is the Minnesota taxpayer,” a source who worked on a federal investigation into Minnesotans attempting to join overseas terror groups, told the outlet.

“There is an issue here that is real, and if there is ever an event that is traceable back to these funds, or to people from this area, then this situation will take on a whole new set of optics,” the source warned. (Read more: New York Post, 11/20/2025)

November 21, 2025 – Trump: “Minnesota, under Governor Walz, is a hub of fraudulent money laundering activity”

November 24, 2025 – Vindman brothers who helped impeach Trump In 2020, are now under investigation

Alexander (l) and Eugene Vindman (Credit: public domain)

Rep. Eugene Vindman, D-Va., and his twin brother Alexander are reportedly under investigation for illegally acting as “paid brokers” for U.S. defense firms seeking business in Ukraine.

“Pentagon General Counsel Earl Matthews alleges that Vindman and his twin brother Alex did not have approval from the U.S. government before seeking to act as ‘paid brokers’ for American defense firms pursuing contracts with Ukraine after Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion,” the Washington Post revealed over the weekend, citing a Nov. 19 letter for War Secretary Pete Hegseth.

“The letter does not explicitly allege the Vindmans received money from the Ukrainian government, arguing only that they “did not insulate themselves from the requirements of federal law,” the Post added.

Eugene Vindman confirmed the investigation Friday on Twitter/X. He claimed it’s politically motivated in response to his calls for the White house to release the transcript of a recent call between President Donald Trump and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

However, the Trump administration has signaled that it may investigate since before Trump took office. Last November, billionaire Elon Musk accused Alexander Vindman of treason.

“Vindman is on the payroll of Ukrainian oligarchs and has committed treason against the United States, for which he will pay the appropriate penalty,” Musk said in November on his platform, Twitter/X.

(…)  Politico revealed in 2023 that that Alex Vindman is heading a group called Trident Support, which wants to send American military contractors to Ukraine. According to the documents, Vindman, who is of Ukrainian origin, is seeking $12 million for his project—$2 million for “initial operating capability” and another $10 million for “full operating.”

While such a scheme may not be illegal, it demonstrates that the Vindman brothers are war profiteers who benefit from an escalation in Ukraine.  (Read more: Headline News, 11/24/2025) (Archive)

November 24, 2025 – What happened on Election Day 2024 to stop the steal

2024 Election:

There are many more tweets to cover. All are gathered here:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1882074856730300718.html

November 24, 2025 – Techno Fog: The Comey case is dismissed (without prejudice); DOJ will appeal

Today, a federal judge ruled that Lindsey Halligan, the interim U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, was unlawfully appointed and “had no lawful authority” to present Comey’s indictment to the grand jury.

As a result, he granted James Comey’s motion to dismiss the indictment and the motion to dismiss of Letitia James.

While the court’s order dismissed the indictment without prejudice, the dismissal – if upheld – may effectively end the prosecution, as the statute of limitations on Comey’s crimes (false statements and obstructing a congressional proceeding) will have since passed.

(…) The Appointment Clause is found in Article II of the Constitution, and the relevant part states that principal officers must be appointed by the President “with the Advice and Consent of the Senate.” While U.S. attorneys are inferior officers, Congress – in accordance with its Constitutional mandate under Article II – has provided the law by which U.S. attorneys are appointed through Senate approval. See 28 U.S.C. § 541(a) (“The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, a United States attorney for each judicial district.”).

Of course, this presents a problem for new Presidential administrations – sometimes, there are delays in the Senate confirmation of a U.S. Attorney. Or, a nomination may be terminated or rejected by the Senate, which requires the appointment of a temporary U.S. Attorney.

Congress addressed that problem through Section 546, which states:

“The Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is present.”

But there are some limitations to that appointment power conferred to the Attorney General under Section 546. First, the Attorney General may not nominate a person whose appointment has been refused by the Senate. And second, the interim appointment expires in 120 days.

Addressing the circumstances where the 120-day appointment expires, Section 546 states:

“the district court for such district may appoint a United States attorney to serve until the vacancy is filled. The order of appointment by the court shall be filed with the clerk of the court.”

Here’s where we get to the Halligan situation. Her predecessor was Erik Siebert, who had a 120-day appointment as U.S. Attorney for EDVA. His appointment was to expire on May 21, 2025, so the EDVA judges extended his appointment until the vacancy is filled.

Siebert, however, resigned from his position – reportedly because of his concern in pursuing charges against James Comey and Letitia James. Faced with this vacancy, Attorney General Bondi appointed Halligan.

That gets us to the issue in the Comey and Letitia James cases: whether the Attorney General can appoint another interim U.S. Attorney, or whether subsequent appointments may only be made by the judges of the applicable judicial district.

Section 546 does not explicitly answer that question. There is no stated prohibition from the Attorney General appointing a second interim appointment. Furthermore, there is no explicit language that only the district court may make an appointment after the 120 days.

For reference, here is the text in full:

Judge Cameron Currie (Credit: public domain)

I provide the text in full because it is important in light of Judge Currie’s order. He found that the language makes “clear” that the appointment power does not revert back to the Attorney General “if the Court-appointed U.S. Attorney leaves office before a Senate-confirmed U.S. Attorney is installed.”

We read Section 546 different. The court is just wrong. The law gives the district court the option to appoint a U.S. Attorney until the vacancy is filled. But providing an option does not confer absolute authority. Neither does it take the lawful authority (provided in Section 546(a)) away from the Attorney General to make another appointment. In fact, the only limitation on the authority of the Attorney General is that they cannot appoint those who were previously rejected by the Senate.

Part of the court’s reasoning (we won’t address everything in its lengthy order) was that allowing the Attorney General to make multiple interim appointments would render 546(d) – the part allowing the district to make its own appointment – “insignificant” and “dormant in all but the most unlikely situations.” This would thus allow the Attorney General’s appointments to “serve indefinitely” without Senate approval.

But this parade of horribles is unpersuasive. Not only do many statutory provisions lie dormant by their nature (think emergency appointments, emergency powers, etc.) but there are definitely trade-offs when the Attorney General has to keep making 120-day appointments, such as the inability to properly further the President’s ambitions or the inability to find worthy candidates to serve on such temporary positions.

The court also looked to the legislative history of Section 546 to support its order, citing Democrats like Senator Patrick Leahy who, in 2006, stated that Section 546 “is not designed or intended to be used repeatedly for the same vacancy.”

In doing so, the court cherry picked the statements of Senators who agreed with his position while disregarding those Senators whose statements on Section 546 disagreed with his finding. As noted in the Government’s motion on this issue, Senator Jon Kyle observed, Section 546 reinstated the same language as a prior law that allowed the Attorney General to “make consecutive 120-day appointments of interim U.S. attorneys.”

But that legislative history wasn’t in the court’s order. Neither were the facts that Section 546, which was amended in 2006/2007 to restore the prior version’s statutory language that was understood to allow successive appointments. The judge, in effect, “looked over the crowd and picked out his friends.”

As the Government further explained:

“If Congress had intended to block successive appointments in 2007, as Defendants claim, returning to the former text that had long been understood to authorize such appointments would have been a bizarre way of doing so.”

Where do we go from here?

(Read more: Techno Fog, 11/24/2025)  (Archive)

November 25, 2025 – Pentagon bureaucrats block Trump order to reinstate troops purged by Biden’s Covid vaccine mandate, an illegal order

RESISTANCE: Ten months after Trump ordered reinstatement of troops purged by Biden’s Covid mandate, only 86 have been restored. Pentagon holdovers, led by DEI bureaucrat Stephanie Miller, are blocking Trump’s order.

The War Department has reinstated only 86 service members despite Trump’s January directive to restore all troops forced out under Biden’s Covid shot mandate. Officials blame Stephanie Miller, the DoW undersecretary controlling personnel systems, who designed and enforced the original mandate and previously served as the Pentagon’s DEI chief. Her husband’s work as a defense and pharmaceutical lobbyist adds further conflict concerns. Hegseth and senior Trump deputies have spent months fighting internal resistance to comply with the order.

Policy Obstruction in the Department of War🚨

Why do woke General Officers continue to get promoted while reinstatement of unlawfully discharged personnel continues to stagnate and go nowhere (despite President Trump’s EO to expedite their reinstatement)?

Meet Stephanie Miller, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of War for Military Personnel Policy for the Department of War and architect of the military’s previous Diversity and Inclusion program.

Stephanie is an SES who oversees the “full spectrum of human resource policies for over two million military personnel serving in the Department of War.”

Stephanie is in charge of accession policy, personnel management, General and Flag Officer promotions and retention, and more.

According to Stephanie’s bio, she served in “a variety of executive positions throughout the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel Policy,” to include leadership positions as the DoD Director of Diversity and Inclusion Management.

In addition to serving as a special assistant to SECDEF Ashton Carter, under whose tenure, in January of 2016, announced that “the Department of Defense opened all military roles to women, overriding a request by the Marine Corps to continue to exempt women from certain positions. In June 2016, Carter announced that transgender individuals would be allowed to join and openly serve in the military,” also served as Deputy Director for Navy Diversity and in a leadership position as the DOD Director of Diversity and Inclusion Management.

Stephanie served as a special assistant to SECDEF Chuck Hagel, who oversaw sequestration and in 2013 during a visit to Asian countries, stated his “main doubt was American staying power in the region. Hagel called the decline of American military power a “good thing”, because it forced American allies to share responsibilities. On July 31, 2013, Hagel announced the results of his Strategic Choices and Management Review, undertaken in response to the budget sequestration in 2013. One of the options he highlighted was to reduce the navy’s aircraft carrier groups down from 11 to as little as eight.

Under Stephanie’s leadership, military recruiting dropped to an all time low in the entire history of the all volunteer force from 2022-2024. Multiple branches failed to achieve recruiting numbers for the first time since the draft ended in 1973.

Stephanie has been an advisor to, and architect of, every decision in the military over the last decade and a half that has harmed military readiness and overall military strength.

As the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy, all accession and General Officer promotions run directly through her. You need not ask yourself why woke Flag Officers continue to accelarate through promotions, and personnel seeking reinstatement for unlawful discharges continue to run into red tape and road blocks. The answer is clear.

(Of note: I’ve include her previous bio and current bio. Her current bio is scrubbed of any mention of DEI.)


November 25, 2025 – GAO official admits GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control

CAUGHT ON HIDDEN CAMERA: U.S. Government Accountability Office Director Admits GAO Staff “Stole & Backed Up” Vaccine Data Allegedly Deleted by RFK Jr.’s HHS – Possible Violations of Federal Records, Theft, & CFAA Laws.

Steven Putansu, a 16-year veteran of the U.S. Government Accountability Office & current Assistant Director, revealed a covert effort inside GAO to preserve vaccine research data.

Putansu admitted on hidden camera GAO staff “stole & backed up” federal data to keep it outside RFK Jr. led HHS control – a potential violation of several federal statutes, including:

– Unauthorized Removal or Destruction of Public Records (18 U.S.C. § 2071)
– Theft or Conversion of Government Property (18 U.S.C. § 641)
– Computer Fraud & Abuse Act – CFAA (18 U.S.C. § 1030) for accessing or copying government data without authorization.

“We’ve stolen & backed those things up so that someday they can come back to government.”

“I’d watch out for the vaccine denying HHS who’s going to ruin health care in this country even more than it already is.”

“It limits the amount of permanent damage… research he’s trying to delete is stored outside his control.”

Bro this is Deep State clownery on steroids, the kind of mask-off confession you normally only hear in a bad movie right before the villain gets dragged out of the building with a box of his desk junk. You’ve got a GAO director literally bragging on hidden camera that he and his little bureaucrat Avengers “stole” federal data, hid it off-site, and are running some rogue side-mission because they don’t like who the American people put in charge. That’s not “oversight,” that’s government fan fiction written by a guy who thinks he’s Jason Bourne but he’s really Dwight Schrute with a clearance badge.

This dude straight up lists federal crimes like he’s reading a grocery receipt, then says “If they ever find a way to get me, I’m done,” which is basically the guilty man national anthem. The arrogance is insane, the entitlement is radioactive, and the panic is delicious. Launch the investigation, put sunlight on every corner of this operation, and kick every rogue bureaucrat out of the cockpit. You can’t have unelected pencil pushers running secret data heists because they don’t like the new sheriff in town. This is the exact swamp infection America is sick of, and it just got caught dropping receipts on camera like a damn amateur.

Bro this is the kind of deep-state cockroach confession you only get when the cameras are hidden and the wine is flowing, and holy hell this dude delivered the whole damn script like he forgot he wasn’t talking to his therapist. The GAO literally admitting they stole federal data, hid it off-site, and are basically running a shadow government IT department because they don’t like who’s in charge at HHS. That ain’t “oversight,” that’s bureaucratic cartel behavior, straight up. These clowns think they’re the guardians of the universe, deciding which elected administration is allowed to govern and which policies get deleted or “protected.”

And the funniest part? He’s whining like, “we had to steal it to stop RFK Jr from ruining healthcare,” like bro, you just confessed to multiple felonies on camera while bragging about saving democracy like you’re Frodo carrying a USB stick to Mordor. This is the swamp exactly as Trump always described it, smug pencil-neck lifers who genuinely think they’re above the law and can override presidents. They don’t serve America, they serve themselves. These people shouldn’t just be fired, they should be audited so hard their hard drives confess too.

November 26, 2025 – Trump vindicated as Fani Willis’ case is tossed out by new prosecutor

Trump and codefendant mugshots from Fulton County-jail in Georgia recorder.

The prosecutor who inherited Georgia’s chaotic election interference case against President Donald Trump has pulled the plug in a major vindication for the president.

Pete Skandalakis, the executive director of the Prosecuting Attorneys’ Council of Georgia, told the court Wednesday he won’t move forward with the long-running probe. He took control last month after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was tossed from the case for creating an “appearance of impropriety” through her romantic entanglement with the special prosecutor she hired.

Trump’s lead Georgia attorney, Steve Sadow, celebrated the decision as the long-overdue collapse of a politically driven hit job.

“The political persecution of President Trump by disqualified DA Fani Willis is finally over. This case should never have been brought. A fair and impartial prosecutor has put an end to this lawfare,” Sadow told Newsweek in an email.

While prosecutors were barred from going after Trump while he’s in the Oval Office, the case had continued to loom over 14 remaining defendants. They included former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani and Trump’s ex–White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, both of whom still faced charges before Wednesday’s move effectively froze the entire prosecution. (Trending Politics, 11/26/2025)  (Archive)

November 26, 2025 – Two National Guard members are shot in D.C. by illegal Afghan national with ties to CIA

U.S. Army Specialist Sarah Beckstrom succumbed to her injuries on Thanksgiving Day, 11/27/2025. (Credit: public domain)

West Virginia National Guardsman Andrew Wolfe remains in critical condition. (Credit: Facebook)

Pirro: We have been in constant contact with their families and have provided them with every resource needed during this difficult time. The two National Guardsmen that we’re talking about are Sarah Beckstrom, who is 20 years old, and Andrew Wolfe, who is 24 years old. They were uniformed members of the West Virginia National Guard, and they were in DC to keep DC safe, pursuant to President Trump’s executive order to Make DC Safe and Beautiful. They answered the call, they took the charge, they volunteered. They put their lives on the line for people they don’t even know, and that, unfortunately, is becoming a reality more and more for the members of law enforcement.

https://rumble.com/v72b6b6-jeanine-pirro-identifies-west-virginia-virginia-national-guardsman-shot-in-.html

Terrorist Who Shot Two National Guard Members in D.C. Was Let into the Country by the Biden Administration’s Operation Allies Welcome Program

Rahmanullah Lakanwal traveled to the United States in 2021 from Islamabad International Airport. According to newly obtained information, Rahmanullah Lakanwal a former soldier of Afghanistan’s Zero-One Unit who had been trained by U.S. forces traveled to Islamabad in late 2021. Reliable sources confirm that he spent 24 days in Islamabad, mostly around Islamabad International Airport, waiting for his documents to be processed and for his evacuation flight to the United States. During this period, he remained in Pakistan while awaiting the final approval for his relocation. After completing the required procedures, Lakanwal eventually departed for the United States from Islamabad International Airport.

November 26, 2025 – Democrat judge overturns jury’s guilty verdict; frees Somali immigrant who stole $7.2 MILLION in Medicaid fraud scheme

Judge Sarah West (Credit: Gateway Pundit)

Radical Democrat judge Sarah West, appointed by former Democrat Governor Mark Dayton, has tossed out a jury’s unanimous guilty verdict, setting free Abdifatah Yusuf, a Somali immigrant convicted of masterminding a massive Medicaid fraud ring that siphoned off $7.2 million from taxpayers.

A jury had found Yusuf guilty in August on six counts of aiding and abetting theft by swindle, following evidence that his home-healthcare company billed Medicaid for hundreds of thousands dollars in “phantom” care, padding bills for services never delivered.

Prosecutors documented that many of those funds were funneled into luxury cars, high-end clothing, and other extravagant personal purchases.

But Judge West, rather than upholding the jury’s verdict, claimed the case hinged on circumstantial evidence and offered “other reasonable inferences” for the billing irregularities, arguing prosecutors failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Yusuf was personally responsible for the fraud. She issued a judgment of acquittal.

Jurors, prosecutors, and state lawmakers were stunned. One juror told reporters he believed the evidence demonstrated “obvious guilt.” The state’s Attorney General has already filed an appeal, warning the decision undermines public trust.

KARE11 reported:

“It was not a difficult decision whatsoever. The deliberation took probably four hours at most.  Based off of the state’s evidence that was presented, it was beyond a reasonable doubt,” jury foreperson Ben Walfoort told KARE 11 News.

[…]

Jurors from the case can’t believe the decision.

“I am shocked. I’m shocked based off of all of the evidence that was presented to us and the obvious guilt that we saw based off of the said evidence,” Walfoort said.

Another juror told KARE 11: “We didn’t take our job lightly. We went through a lot of evidence and discussed a lot, took our time, but we all came to an agreement pretty easily.”

The Attorney General’s Office filed an appeal on Monday. Prosecutors are rarely able to appeal an acquittal, but they can in this case since the judgment overturns the will of the jury.

Yusuf’s attorney Ian Birrell provided KARE 11 with this statement: “Judge West’s ruling affirms what we have maintained from the beginning: our client Mr. Yusuf was wrongfully accused and did not commit fraud or racketeering. The Court’s decision to enter judgments of acquittal on all charges reflects the fundamental principle that justice requires both fairness and proof. We appreciate the Court’s careful attention to the evidence and the law.”

(Gateway Pundit, 11/26/2025)  (Archive)

November 27, 2025 – Trump’s message to America on Thanksgiving Day

A very Happy Thanksgiving salutation to all of our Great American Citizens and Patriots who have been so nice in allowing our Country to be divided, disrupted, carved up, murdered, beaten, mugged, and laughed at, along with certain other foolish countries throughout the World, for being “Politically Correct,” and just plain STUPID, when it comes to Immigration. The official United States Foreign population stands at 53 million people (Census), most of which are on welfare, from failed nations, or from prisons, mental institutions, gangs, or drug cartels. They and their children are supported through massive payments from Patriotic American Citizens who, because of their beautiful hearts, do not want to openly complain or cause trouble in any way, shape, or form. They put up with what has happened to our Country, but it’s eating them alive to do so! A migrant earning $30,000 with a green card will get roughly $50,000 in yearly benefits for their family. The real migrant population is much higher. This refugee burden is the leading cause of social dysfunction in America, something that did not exist after World War II (Failed schools, high crime, urban decay, overcrowded hospitals, housing shortages, and large deficits, etc.). As an example, hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia are completely taking over the once great State of Minnesota. Somalian gangs are roving the streets looking for “prey” as our wonderful people stay locked in their apartments and houses hoping against hope that they will be left alone. The seriously retarded Governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing, either through fear, incompetence, or both, while the worst “Congressman/woman” in our Country, Ilhan Omar, always wrapped in her swaddling hijab, and who probably came into the U.S.A. illegally in that you are not allowed to marry your brother, does nothing but hatefully complain about our Country, its Constitution, and how “badly” she is treated, when her place of origin is a decadent, backward, and crime ridden nation, which is essentially not even a country for lack of Government, Military, Police, schools, etc…

…Even as we have progressed technologically, Immigration Policy has eroded those gains and living conditions for many. I will permanently pause migration from all Third World Countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover, terminate all of the millions of Biden illegal admissions, including those signed by Sleepy Joe Biden’s Autopen, and remove anyone who is not a net asset to the United States, or is incapable of loving our Country, end all Federal benefits and subsidies to noncitizens of our Country, denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility, and deport any Foreign National who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western Civilization. These goals will be pursued with the aim of achieving a major reduction in illegal and disruptive populations, including those admitted through an unauthorized and illegal Autopen approval process. Only REVERSE MIGRATION can fully cure this situation. Other than that, HAPPY THANKSGIVING TO ALL, except those that hate, steal, murder, and destroy everything that America stands for — You won’t be here for long!

November 28, 2025 – Biden’s DOJ determined he was mentally unfit to stand trial; they can’t argue the opposite in response to the Autopen scandal

OCTOBER 2023

 

OCTOBER 2023

November 28, 2025: What is a color revolution? DataRepublican: “Here is the truth, lifted from my manuscript”

They do not like boiling a color revolution down to a sequence for a few reasons among which:
1) The people participating tend to be siloed (civic engagement isn’t the same as vote tabulation)
2) They depend on the veneer that color revolutions are totally organic

But this is the 7-step sequence which I reverse-engineered.

 

@Grok What were the different color revolutions in Eastern Europe? What years did they occur? Who funded them?

Major color revolutions in Eastern Europe/post-Soviet states include:

– Bulldozer Revolution (Serbia, 2000)
– Rose Revolution (Georgia, 2003)
– Orange Revolution (Ukraine, 2004)
– Tulip Revolution (Kyrgyzstan, 2005)

Funding often linked to Western orgs like USAID, NED, and Soros’ Open Society Foundations. Views differ: some see organic uprisings with aid, others as externally driven interventions. Sources: Wikipedia, E-IR, Global Times.

@Grok Were there also minor color revolutions? What year and who funded them?

Other lesser-known or attempted color revolutions include:

– Jeans Revolution (Belarus, 2006): Failed protests against election fraud.
– Grape Revolution (Moldova, 2009): Anti-communist unrest.
– Colorful Revolution (North Macedonia, 2016): Protests against government corruption.
– Velvet Revolution (Armenia, 2018): Ousted prime minister.
– 2020 Belarus protests: Challenged Lukashenko’s re-election.

Funding views vary: Western sources see organic movements with NGO support (e.g., NED, USAID, Open Society); critics (Russia, China) claim US-orchestrated interference. Sources: Wikipedia, E-IR, Global Times.

November 28, 2025 – Nicole Shanahan shares her experience with the Silicon Valley “tech wife mafia” and how they were used

This is the most jaw-dropping 4 minutes and 21 seconds you will watch this year.

Nicole Shanahan — ex-wife of Google co-founder Sergey Brin, former running mate of RFK Jr., and someone who personally signed nine-figure philanthropy checks — just went full whistleblower on the entire Silicon Valley “tech wife mafia” and how they were used.

Her exact words (full clip attached):

“I don’t think many of the tech mafia wives realize… they were used to set the groundwork for what Klaus Schwab calls The Great Reset.

Their money especially was being conscripted through a network of NGO advisors, Hollywood, Davos, and their own companies.

A really small group of people… completely blind to how their groundwork is being used to enable these Great Reset policies.”

Then she turns the knife inward:

“These women find their meaning through philanthropic work. I really believed I was helping Black communities and indigenous communities rise up.

But now the problems have gotten worse. Crime worse. Mental health worse. The whole model is broken.

At the end of the day they always go: ‘But climate change.’

Social justice + climate change — it gets progressive women 100% of the time.”

She even says many now believe the biggest “climate change issues” are actually geoengineering issues.

This isn’t some random podcast bro.

This is a woman who lived in the mansions, sat on the boards, flew private to Davos parties… and is now saying:

“We were the useful idiots.”

Watch the full unedited 4:21 below. Sound on.

November 29, 2025 – Timeline of a Deep State Hit

Timeline of a deep state hit:

A) a JSOC kill strike is ordered on an authorized target. Not a capture strike, a kill strike – President Obama was quite fond of them btw – 500+ to his name, including Americans.

B) the story is leaked. A leak from JSOC? Probably not – the leak is probably closer to the SECWAR’s office in the Pentagon. The Washington Post begins writing the story.

C) a Soros-funded NGO puts billboards up encouraging military personnel to report unlawful orders… although there are no unlawful orders identified.

D) out of nowhere, the Seditious Six – which includes one presidential hopeful and one former IC member who had direct involvement in the original attempt to destroy Trump – delivers to social media a “don’t give up the ship” video – a public service announcement to all personnel to refuse unlawful orders.

*** the video was funded and produced a Soros funded NGO.

E) Senator [S]lotkin, the former CIA ghoul, goes on the news and is very careful to state that she can’t identify any unlawful orders that have been given.

F) boom, the WaPo delivers the story claiming unlawful orders.

G) Friday evening, everyone on the left hits social media – with paid amplification – about the unlawful orders.

H) the Sunday shows will be filled with calls for war crimes charges, impeachments, and resignations.

All a coincidence, right? None of it was coordinated, right?

Not all civil wars happen on the battlefield.

They planned it before the first boat strike.

SEDITION EXPOSED!
ANTI-TRUMP MILITARY CAMPAIGN PLANNING DISCOVERED IN AUGUST 2025.
1️⃣ Billboards have recently sprung up across America promoting military sedition.
2️⃣ Billboards sponsored by “http://NotWhatYouSignedUpFor.org”
3️⃣ Organization website INITIATED on AUGUST 28,2025. UPDATED SEPT 3, 2025.
4️⃣ FIRST VENEZUELAN DRUG BOAT STRIKE SEPTEMBER 2, 2025.

QUESTIONS:
➡️ The “Seditious Six” have now quoted the Venezuela boat strikes as the reason for their statements to military members.
If so, how did this organization know about Venezuela boat strikes and initiate a website in August if the first strike was September 2, 2025?
➡️ Why was the website updated the day AFTER the first boat was hit?
➡️ Two weeks following this, media were restricted from the Pentagon.
Was there a leak regarding conflict with Venezuela?
➡️ Is Maduro a conspirator in the Color Revolution to overthrow the United States government?

Counter.
Ram their hypocrisy down their throats until they choke on it
Tomorrow morning, every swinging dick with a phone drops the same meme.
Obama. 542 drone strikes, 3,797 bodies, 324 civilians, zero tears from the Slotkin & Brennan crowd.
Hegseth. 77 dead cartel boat crews moving poison that kills 100k Americans a year = WAR CRIME!!!
Make it so loud that by sundown, every blue-check ghoul is forced to defend drone-bombing weddings in Yemen.
Treat the leakers like the enemy combatants they are
This WaPo hit is a classified leak of JSOC ops.
Tell Bondi to open a leak investigation tonight.
Subpoenas hit reporters doors before breakfast. Phones, Signal, ProtonMail, all of it.
Then go on camera and say the quiet part loud. Somebody inside just committed a felony to protect drug smugglers. We’re going to find them, drag them into the light, and ruin their lives.

November 29, 2025 – Minnesota DHS staff: Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota

Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota. We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership in stopping fraud but no, we got the opposite response. Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring, threats, repression, and did his best to discredit fraud reports. Instead of partnership, we got the full weight of retaliation by Tim Walz, certain DFL members and an indifferent mainstream media. It’s scary, isolating and left us wondering who we can turn to.

In addition to retaliating against whistleblower, Tim Walz disempowered the Office of the Legislative Auditor, allowing agencies to disregard their audit findings and guidance. Media and politicians supporting Tim Walz or the DFL-agenda attacked whistleblowers who were trying to raise red flags on fraudulent activities.

This is a cascade of systemic failures leading up to Tim Walz. Agency leaders appointed by Tim Walz willfully disregarded rules and laws to keep fraud reports quiet – even to the extent of threatening families of whistleblowers. These same leaders are not qualified for their jobs, instead getting leadership jobs via Tim Walz’s friendship so state government were left floundering. DFL lawmakers refused to acknowledge fraud and deflected any serious conversation to stop fraud. Biased mainstream media such as WCCO and MPR showed absolutely no interest in covering fraud happening in our own state. Programs, especially in behavioral health and disability services were built without any guardrails against fraud, all in an attempt to extract more funding from legislature and the federal government.

As staff, we firsthand witnessed and observed fraud happening yet we were shutdown, reassigned and told to keep quiet. Sometimes more. Leadership did not want to appear to discriminate against certain communities and were unwilling to take action, such as stopping fraud, that would have an adverse impact on their image. To date, no single agency leader has been held responsible for their role in fraud whether it’s Shireen Gandhi, Jess Geil, Jodi Harpstead, Natasha Merz, Eric Grumdahl or others.

It is a structure created and maintained by Tim Walz who has created an environment of inter-related agencies and institutions including the media – that help foster fraud through retaliation and turning a blind eye in exchange for political gain in the form of high power agency leadership jobs or other perks.

Fundamentally, Tim Walz is dishonest, lacks ethics and integrity, has poor leadership abilities, and has never taken any accountability for his role in fraud. Instead, Tim Walz deflects by blaming national politics for his own failings and distracts the public with inveterate lying. These lies include his reference of a budget surplus under his tenure. Fact is, Minnesota never had a surplus, we had been given federal ARPA funds that were conflated as surplus money otherwise, we’d be in a deficit. And those ARPA funds, which were meant to be temporary funds were used to create more leadership positions for Tim Walz “buddies.”

As such, we can’t fight fraud in Minnesota alone hence why we’re appealing to the federal levels of government. We need all the help we can get as Tim Walz’s agency leaders have upped their brazen approach in covering up their knowledge of fraud.

We are grateful to numerous solid politicians (esp the Fraud Committee) and media outlets who are trying to halt fraud. We are also grateful to other whistleblowers who are bravely stepping up.

Thank You NY Times for bringing the plight of Minnesota to the national stage.

November 29, 2025 – Another Afghan national is arrested days after DC terrorist attack for threatening to bomb Fort Worth

Mohammad Dawood Alokozay (Credit: public domain)

A second Afghan national who was flown into the United States under Biden’s Operation Allies Welcome program in 2021 has been arrested in connection with a terror plot after threatening on TikTok to detonate a bomb in Texas.

This comes just days after 29-year-old Afghan national Rahmanullah Lakanwal, who entered the country under the same program in 2021, ambushed two West Virginia National Guardsmen in Washington, DC, killing one and critically injuring the other.

Lakanwal’s permission to be in the US expired in September 2025, and he has been living in the United States illegally ever since.

Now,  Mohammad Dawood Alokozay has been arrested for posting a video of himself online, threatening to use a homemade bomb in an attack around Fort Worth, Texas.

He was admitted as a lawful permanent resident on September 7, 2022, following Biden’s failed withdrawal from Afghanistan during the summer of 2021.

Alokozay has been charged with making a terroristic threat at the state level.

Kayleigh McEnany reported on the story for Fox:

McEnany: You won’t believe this. DHS is confirming that an Afghan national was arrested Tuesday after posting a video of himself on Tiktok indicating he was building a bomb with an intended target of the Fort Worth area. Mohammed Dawood. Alokazai is charged at the state level with making a terroristic threat, according to DHS.

Listen to this. He came to the United States as part of Operation Allies Welcome. So, here you have it. This happened Tuesday— Texas Department of Public Safety. This is a second Afghan national, second one this week, Operation Allies Welcome.

He had a terror plot, we know it comes the same week that that deranged individual, that alleged assassin, took out two of our heroic National Guard, came here on the same program, Operation Allies Welcome, a program that we were assured time and time again by Mayorkas, by Jen Psaki, by Joe Biden himself, was safe and secure.

But here we have a second data point in one week that it was not safe, it was not secure, and we’ve got to look very hard at this program as President Trump is vowing to make change.

https://rumble.com/v72e1v2-afghan-national-arrested-for-threatening-to-bomb-fort-worth.html

(Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/29/2025)  (Archive)

November 29, 2025 – Kash Patel says all contents of FBI Trump-Russia burn bags will be made public

  • FBI Director Kash Patel says the contents of the burn bags containing Trump-Russia documents discovered at the FBI building will be made public one way or another.
  • “You’re going to see everything we found in that room in one way or another, be it through investigation, public trial, or disclosure to the Congress,” Patel told The Epoch Times in an interview with reporter Jan Jekielek that will air Saturday.
  • The bureau said that the classified information was stashed away in a room at FBI Headquarters and was related to Crossfire Hurricane and also other FBI inquiries into President Donald Trump and his allies. Patel previously said that the FBI had found “several bags” containing evidence related to the Russiagate investigation.
  • One electronic communication made public by the Justice Department in court filings related to the prosecution of former FBI Director James Comey earlier this month indicated the FBI began a preliminary investigation into the discovery this summer.

(Read more: Just the News, 11/29/2025) (Archive)

November 29, 2025 – House Oversight releases bombshell footage: Biden aides admit to covering up concerns about his health

HOUSE OVERSIGHT RELEASES BOMBSHELL FOOTAGE: BIDEN AIDES ADMIT TO HEALTH COVERUP

The House Oversight Committee has released exclusive extended footage of Biden aides admitting how they propped up the 46th president as he declined.

Makeup.

Teleprompters at small fundraisers.

Limiting events.

Stage-managing appearances.

Reducing his workload.

Avoiding interviews.

Even recruiting Hollywood directors Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg to help with the State of the Union.

They controlled everything, including who could see him.

This wasn’t a presidency. It was a production.

The 91-page committee report found Biden’s “inner circle” took steps to “meticulously stage-manage” his public appearances, lighten his private workload, and block lawmakers from talking to him directly.

Three key aides took the Fifth Amendment when questioned, including White House physician Dr. Kevin O’Connor, who refused to answer: “Were you ever told to lie about the president’s health?”

Former Chief of Staff Jeff Zients admitted under oath he didn’t even know who operated the autopen that signed approximately 92% of Biden’s documents.

Trump has now declared all autopen-signed executive actions “NULL AND VOID” and threatened Biden with perjury charges if he claims he authorized them.

The same people who called you a conspiracy theorist for questioning Biden’s fitness were stage-managing his every movement.

They knew. They all knew.

And they lied to your face for four years.

Teleprompters at small… https://t.co/TNQByFls6o pic.twitter.com/WzfcaD1SQE

November 29, 2025 – Kash Patel: James Comey celebrated way too early that his indictment got dismissed by an activist judge

Bro this is the kind of plot twist that makes DC elites start sweating through their $9,000 suits, because Kash Patel saying “we’re NOT done” is basically the political equivalent of a horror movie villain whispering “I’ll be right back” from behind the curtain.

Comey was out here doing his little victory lap like a dude who thinks the ref blew the whistle, completely forgetting there’s still a whole fourth quarter left and the other team just activated beast mode. And the way Kash said “right after Thanksgiving” got half of Washington clutching their pearls, because that ain’t vague, that’s a countdown.

No violence, no threats, just cold bureaucratic karma circling back like a heat-seeking missile. Comey celebrated early like a rookie who spikes the ball at the five-yard line, and now he’s about to learn that premature bragging in politics is a full-contact sport.

Stay tuned, the popcorn’s warm and the swamp creatures are trembling.

November 29, 2025 – NYT: Tim Walz oversaw ‘staggering’ levels of Social Services fraud — Minnesota DHS estimates $8 billion stolen since 2017

Tim Walz (Credit: Gage Skidmore)

The left-wing New York Times has admitted that Minnesota Governor Tim Walz oversaw a “staggering” level of fraud across the state’s social services.

In a piece published on Saturday, the Times argued that Walz, who last year became one of the least successful vice-presidential nominees in living memory, had overseen a level of fraud “staggering in its scale and brazenness,” largely by the state’s Somali community.

Their report states:

Over the last five years, law enforcement officials say, fraud took root in pockets of Minnesota’s Somali diaspora as scores of individuals made small fortunes by setting up companies that billed state agencies for millions of dollars’ worth of social services that were never provided.

Federal prosecutors say that 59 people have been convicted in those schemes so far, and that more than $1 billion in taxpayers’ money has been stolen in three plots they are investigating.

That is more than Minnesota spends annually to run its Department of Corrections. Minnesota’s fraud scandal stood out even in the context of rampant theft during the pandemic, when Americans stole tens of billions through unemployment benefits, business loans and other forms of aid, according to federal auditors.

Outrage has swelled among Minnesotans, and fraud has turned into a potent political issue in a competitive campaign season. Gov. Tim Walz and fellow Democrats are being asked to explain how so much money was stolen on their watch, providing Republicans, who hope to take back the governor’s office in 2026, with a powerful line of attack.

However, Walz is unwilling to confront the issue over his fear of losing Somali voting base, who may seek to replace him with an even more radical candidate of their own, most likely in the style of Congesswoman Ilhan Omar.

(Read more: The Gateway Pundit, 11/30/2025) (Archive)

UPDATE 11/30/2025

As we uncover the layers of fraud, $8 Billion of fraud since 2017 is a low estimate. Fraud investigations may never end but we believe they’ll top $10 Billion by the time we’re done researching.

In the media, we’ve seen that much fraud has been perpetuated by groups of small providers. But we observe that large providers are committing fraud too, but in much more structured ways such as flexing contractual obligations, using DHS insiders to gain an edge in contract procurement, or billing to multiple sources.

We need to also consider fraud by DHS leaders. We are legally required to report fraud but our systems are broken and our leaders are failing at their jobs. It is fraud, waste, abuse when leaders are not competent for their positions, not doing their jobs and oppressing reports of fraud.

***

We are now revising Minnesota DHS fraud predictions to exceed $6.5 billion from 2019 onward. This includes contracts/grants & Medicaid. If we use 2017 as a starting point since that’s when Shireen Gandhi started, predicted fraud in human services clearly exceeds $8 billion.

Despite numerous staff reports to the Office of Inspector General, no follow up was ever provided.

We are overwhelmed by the interest the nation has shown in the fraud occurring in Minnesota. Population wise, we are small but health and human services fraud in our state exceeds that of much larger states like California, New York, Texas & others.

While Tim Walz makes all manner of incorrect statements about Minnesota leading in one way or other, what we really lead in is failed governance. Tim Walz has turned Minnesota into a failed state with deteriorating infrastructure, education and economic metrics, and worst of all, we are failing our most vulnerable citizens by letting cripple state services.

For many years, we reached out to every source available to us to get attention on and help stop fraud. We were lucky to get the Office of the Legislative Auditor, Fraud Committee, certain news outlets and many fine politicians to help shed light on the matter.

Unfortunately, only one DFL member showed interest in fraud – John Hoffman. Contrary to popular belief, we aren’t a political group. But we’ve been continually disappointed in the response we got by the DFL, or lack there of. We hoped for partnership with all political parties but instead, the DFL discredited our reports and pleas. Is protecting your political party or clinging onto power really worth destroying your state?

Many thanks to those who’ve supported us over the years. It’s been an uphill battle that has been uncertain, isolating but one that we aren’t giving up on. We hope that Minnesota will be freed from fraud, good governance is restored and trust in government is rebuilt.

The next step now is to bring in external auditors and new leadership.

Tim Walz has failed Minnesota.

November 30, 2025 – Judge Boasberg authorized secret spying on Congress and now refuses their subpoena to testify

LAWFARE: Judge Boasberg authorized secret spying on Congress and is now refusing to testify. The Senate is now holding hearings to discuss his possible impeachment. He thinks he IS the law.

After revelations that Judge James Boasberg approved clandestine subpoenas and nondisclosure orders targeting congressional Republicans, the Senate demanded his testimony. Boasberg refused, claiming he did not need to answer to the legislative branch he secretly spied on. Senators will now hold hearings on impeachment proceedings for Boasberg and possibly others involved in the unlawful surveillance of elected officials. Lawmakers say Boasberg’s arrogance and defiance show he believes he is beyond accountability, the hallmark of a rogue judge.

The @amuse post frames Chief Judge James Boasberg as a runaway monarch for declining Senate testimony about subpoenas he approved in the FBI’s Arctic Frost investigation. The newly unsealed filings show that prosecutors sought subscriber data and metadata in an influence peddling probe touching several figures, some of whom later became elected Republicans. The subpoenas used nondisclosure orders because the subjects had not been notified. This is standard criminal procedure, not a bespoke surveillance campaign against Congress. Sitting federal judges also do not testify about ongoing matters, both by precedent and by judicial ethics rules, something the post omits.

Republicans have introduced impeachment resolutions, but no bipartisan path exists. Boasberg’s record includes rulings that frustrated both Democratic and Republican administrations on immigration, surveillance, and January 6 sentencing. Judicial independence means Congress can scrutinize these decisions, but cannot compel a judge to violate sealed-case confidentiality. The “he thinks he is the law” rhetoric is political framing, not a reflection of how subpoena authority or Article III oversight works. If the Senate wants answers, the proper venue is DOJ, not the judge bound by silence.